Trojan???

AutoCorrect ?

I'm in doubt now

Has Fedora SystemD trojan?

Not sure what you mean

Is "SystemD" present in Fedora?

Sure

Is "SystemD" present in Fedora?

Fedora was one of the first major distributions to include it

Systemd it's the future of Linux management

Is Fedora so stable with SystemD?

I loved it

Is Fedora so stable with SystemD?

I think the point where it was considered unstable or too new has long passed. I've had issues before but none of them have ever been with systemd

Always with Nvidia, rather… ?

SystemD isn't the best thing in the world, but it works good enough for smart people, who rule distributive development, considering it be good enough to take it's place.

This meme it's already old

SystemD isn't the best thing in the world, but it works good enough for smart people, who rule distributive development, considering it be good enough to take it's place.

?

Don't see it as an evil solution

It's not evil. Maybe not so handy, but not evil.

I loved it

What do you think about SystemD haters?

Mostly times it's very simple and clean

What do you think about SystemD haters?

Man, I think them as retro users

Closed for the new era of Linux

And SystemD "problems"?

Example one

At my job, 60% of the servers are using Linux with systemd

No problems at all

How much software has Fedora? Is true that Fedora has less software than Debian and Arch?

Normally when you looking for program, there is for "Debian, Fedora,openSuse,Arch"

For the most of solutions, we use centos 7

Normally when you looking for program, there is for "Debian, Fedora,openSuse,Arch"

Fact

Sorry, I'll charge my phone

xd

Is Red Hat related to NSA, and does Fedora have backdoors?

?

normally the thing with systemd is philosophy so

nothing important

I just ask. Concerning some sources claim that Red Hat was involved in the NSA spying scandal.

>tfw the only people who know me better than me are the nsa

;__;

Is Red Hat and Fedora community planning to develop a mobile Fedora? (Fedora on smartphones and tablets). There is Ubuntu Phone. And Fedora Phone?

Is Red Hat and Fedora community planning to develop a mobile Fedora? (Fedora on smartphones and tablets). There is Ubuntu Phone. And Fedora Phone?

As far as I know, there are no plans of Fedora Mobile

Guys, if anybody uses PyQt4, and might have answer to my question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42869528/sliding-puzzle-in-pyqt4 I will be really grateful. thanks in advance.

Man, Android it's so far an ultimate solution for mobile

I don't like Linux mobile versions

systemd is something than just work

systemd haters have more to write post about systemd issues but are not able to provide a better solution

Man, Android it's so far an ultimate solution for mobile

Bring me back my Symbian. x3

Is Red Hat and Fedora community planning to develop a mobile Fedora? (Fedora on smartphones and tablets). There is Ubuntu Phone. And Fedora Phone?

Adam Williamson have made son advance in run fedora in intel powered tablets

systemd haters have more to write post about systemd issues but are not able to provide a better solution

True

Bring me back my Symbian. x3

Hahahahahaha, symbian it's good

systemd haters have more to write post about systemd issues but are not able to provide a better solution

What about OpenRC and runit?

What about OpenRC and runit?

I don't know it

Tell me more

http://hotlogo.net/p106167/

It only affected Windows users from the non business Lenovo line. If you use ThinkPad with Linux you are safe.

Exactly

Windows users on the consumer line of lenovos

So not thinkpads

I use ThinkPad t460p, does it have hardware backdoor?

pionen: @chinesejar, no, It doesn't.

I use ThinkPad t460p, does it have hardware backdoor?

No

Wait, I misread the question.

Software Backdoor is one thing, Hardware Backdoor is another.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2886278/how-to-remove-the-dangerous-superfish-adware-presintalled-on-lenovo-pcs.html

http://www.pcworld.com/article/2886278/how-to-remove-the-dangerous-superfish-adware-presintalled-on-lenovo-pcs.html

Don't use preinstalled Windows. An ultimate solution.

I use Fedora

never use Windows

ERROR: S client not available

So I think I don't need to care software backdoor any more

Nice

But... then you have to deal with backdoors on BIOS/UEFI level, and for this matter is why projects like Coreboot and Libreboot does exist: https://www.coreboot.org/ https://libreboot.org/

Someone might claim his laptop is free of preinstalled malware/trojans, but who audits its BIOS/UEFI?

Then, claiming you are free of this because the OEM of your laptop has not been put under the spotlight of the mainstream medias as happened with Lenovo, is BS.

And also FUD.

And also FUD.

Good point

I use Windows because of one software piece.

1C:Enterprise Educational Edition.

Wow

Whats that

Complex System of Enterpeise Activity Automatisation.

Oh

Accounting, banks operations, employment, etc.

Someone might claim his laptop is free of preinstalled malware/trojans, but who audits its BIOS/UEFI?

People do audit that and vulns have been found

Sometimes they can't be fixed; the hardware just has to be replaced

True

People do audit that and vulns have been found

"Talk is cheap, show me the code" BIOS/UEFI are programs, binaries. How do you audit compiled software without its source code?

Sometimes they can't be fixed; the hardware just has to be replaced

AFAIK, installing Coreboot or Libreboot does not require replacing hardware.

AFAIK, installing Coreboot or Libreboot does not require replacing hardware.

And it doesn't fix hardware vulns.

And it doesn't fix hardware vulns.

Wait... like keyloggers on the keyboard firmware itself?

Wait... like keyloggers on the keyboard firmware itself?

No, either CPU or mobo

But usually backdoors, not keyloggers

Often to circumvent security features and such

No, either CPU or mobo

Damn, this is deep s#$%.

It's been a while since I've researched that stuff, but there's one guy who exposed a ton of serious hardware and firmware vulns--many of which were probably accidents, but some of which were definitely deliberate

And then there was the issue where Microsoft screwed up and shipped some devices with signed debug boot rules or whatever they're called that would boot anything

And most firmware will always trust stuff signed by Microsoft

So that killed Secure Boot

Really, you should just assume your hardware is compromised unless it's specifically designed for security, like a YubiKey. And even then, if you use NIST curves, you might be effectively handing keys to the NSA.

So you're still stuck with RSA unless your hardware happens to support something like Curve25519, which is rare. Anything based on P-256 should be considered compromised by the NSA