No problem. Best of luck with the drivers.

Guys I don't know why but fedora connects my 5 GHz WiFi but it doesn't actually work

All of a sudden

If I connect to 2,4 GHz everything works as expected

Guys I don't know why but fedora connects my 5 GHz WiFi but it doesn't actually work

I'm 99% sure this is not Fedora's issue.

Maybe a driver problem >.>

Try booting arch or tails and connecting to such network.

Maybe a driver problem >.>

Possible!

It's so weird

It's an Intel chip anyway

Shouldn't have any problem

A few hours ago I updated it's driver

That could be the reason

I've just deleted the connection and recreated it and it's working again...!?!?

I've just deleted the connection and recreated it and it's working again...!?!?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

At least your problem is back.

so far so good

there is one upside to yum over dnf - yum's name is way cuter, dnf I can only associate with Duke Nukem Forever ?

Yum was cuter, better and pronounceable name ?

Dnf is perfectly pronounceable

Dnf is perfectly pronounceable

Audio of that

Yum was cuter, better and pronounceable name ?

You could type it with the same finger and hand ?

You could type it with the same finger and hand ?

Also true ?

??? But you are only spelling the letters, not pronouncing the word as a syllable

Hahahaha

On that note, i quite like pronouncing dnf - saying yum can easily be mistaken as reaction to something especially of you're talking to firsttimers - d n f is recognizeable and you can just put it into the terminal. :P

Duke Nukem Forever you can't go wrong with it ;)

Dnf is pronounced dandified yum

?

Duke Nukem Forever you can't go wrong with it ;)

Never thought that lol

If it is going nice remove virtualbox and all modules as soon as you can as they may introduce bugs and problems in your kernel.

@Wolfshappen Thanks buddy, virt- manager works way better ?

Make sure to set the hdd in virt manager to virtio and writeback always, the same for network interfaces - to install windows on that you need the spice guest tools on cd (for the driver) and for some distros that dont come with it the qxl driver and so on.

@Wolfshappen Thanks buddy, virt- manager works way better ?

Same here, I ditched virtualbox and use virt-manager, libvirtd, and qemu-kvm stacks instead. Works better, enjoy it.

Anyone using rhel7 pls reply

Same here, I ditched virtualbox and use virt-manager, libvirtd, and qemu-kvm stacks instead. Works better, enjoy it.

I'm curious. In what way do you feel that it works better? I use VB partly because it works identically across Mac, Windows and Linux, but I have no problems with it as a hypervisor. I've also recently been trying VMware Workstation and Fusion and don't find them to beat Vbox in any way that matters to me.

I'm curious. In what way do you feel that it works better? I use VB partly because it works identically across Mac, Windows and Linux, but I have no problems with it as a hypervisor. I've also recently been trying VMware Workstation and Fusion and don't find them to beat Vbox in any way that matters to me.

Because VB requires out-of-tree drivers to work properly and thus may break and often indeed breaks with kernel upgrades. I've never had a such a problem with KVM-based virt tools.

And I think KVM is doing better even performance-wise.

can kvm work with vdmk

can kvm work with vdmk

QEMU which runs on the top of KVM does AFAIK. (most tools don't use KVM directly, but rather through QEMU)

ok

ill try it out then

thanks

lets see if my vbox vms will migrate

how to properly remove old kernels?

hwy

So what? ?

So what? ?

Don't be rude.

Where rude? I need help)

Ok)

So what? ?

So what is not a reply to hey

So what is not a reply to hey

I have a feeling it's a translation issue, not actually trying to be rude.

Where rude? I need help)

What do you need help with? Go ahead and ask. :) You don't need permission to ask.

Oh wait, you did

I have a feeling it's a translation issue, not actually trying to be rude.

K then

lost in translation :P

ERROR: S client not available

how to properly remove old kernels?

Do you mean to keep less of them in history? Or to erase a specific one?

how to properly remove old kernels?

It would help to know why you want to do this so we can give better advice for your situation.

how to properly remove old kernels?

You don't need to. The system does it automatically with every kernel update.

Actually I would always keep the three latest kernels, which is the default, in case something breaks.

+1 (default setting)

can kvm work with vdmk

It can (experimentally) but for best results use qemu-img to convert vmdk to .qcow2

how to properly remove old kernels?

"Dont do that all"

Else you can set an installonly limit but even that, keep it at minimum 2 because a new kernel might not behave as expected and keeping old kernels gives you the safety to go back.

Does anyone run LUKS with TPM?

just wondering

Does anyone run LUKS with TPM?

not, but what for? double security?

In general I like my encryption to be bound on the device >.>

In general I like my encryption to be bound on the device >.>

are you gonna try it? ?

Does anyone run LUKS with TPM?

No, because i dont trust it.

In general I like my encryption to be bound on the device >.>

Yubikey.

Or the OpenGPG card.

In general I like my encryption to be bound on the device >.>

That is bound, hog-tied and gagged.

Yubikey.

Isn't Yubikey closed source? Or just their Yubikey 4 version?

Isn't Yubikey closed source? Or just their Yubikey 4 version?

They are pretty open and you can read their applet code afaik - of course the chip is sealed in. XD But thats why i also mentioned the openpgp card

Well, I wasn't about to use TPM on its own, but TPM + Passphrase :D

Well, I wasn't about to use TPM on its own, but TPM + Passphrase :D

ahhh...

Well, I wasn't about to use TPM on its own, but TPM + Passphrase :D

Eh, i'd still bind LUKS to a more trusted source - one that i can duplicate if one breaks and of course can take somewhere else if i upgrade my pc but keep the ssd.

Since the SSD is build into the device it's not about to go anywhere :D

And I already carry so much things with me including Yubikeys I'm not about to add an additional step >.>

And I already carry so much things with me including Yubikeys I'm not about to add an additional step >.>

i've told you the opensource smartphone, if the smartphone storage is big enough, we do not have to carry too much things

i've told you the opensource smartphone, if the smartphone storage is big enough, we do not have to carry too much things

Yep, I checked it out, it's pretty interesting, but right now, it's not there so I have to work with what I have right now :D Which is a device that can use TPM. So the question is: Is there an easy way to use it with LUKS or not? And by easy way, I refer to something that I can setup in less than 5 minutes without compiling stuff myself or need ressources from an untrusted source (like downloading random scripts from GitHub)

My research says no, but who knows, maybe I missed something

Yep, I checked it out, it's pretty interesting, but right now, it's not there so I have to work with what I have right now :D Which is a device that can use TPM. So the question is: Is there an easy way to use it with LUKS or not? And by easy way, I refer to something that I can setup in less than 5 minutes without compiling stuff myself or need ressources from an untrusted source (like downloading random scripts from GitHub)

hmmm...sounds complicated enough. then you should looking more info from web. i would also be interested if you find something

Yep, I checked it out, it's pretty interesting, but right now, it's not there so I have to work with what I have right now :D Which is a device that can use TPM. So the question is: Is there an easy way to use it with LUKS or not? And by easy way, I refer to something that I can setup in less than 5 minutes without compiling stuff myself or need ressources from an untrusted source (like downloading random scripts from GitHub)

No with the "not compile yourself" option as of now