So if i create test.txt in stuff it will be created on the otherhdd/data?

But still be visible to both?

/dev/sda1 /media/user/DATOS ext4 defaults 0 0 /media/user/DATOS/image /home/user/image none bind 0 0

But still be visible to both?

correct

correct

Then fstab is the completely wrong point to do so.

linux use for many years In Debian I have no problems with fstab

linux use for many years In Debian I have no problems with fstab

This is not how to use fstab.

to do this kind of pointing one should use symlinks.

ln -s /path/to/new/created/folder /path/to/folder/it/points/to

the created/folder must not exists, created must.

This will create created/folder and it will get its contents from points/to

If points/to is a file it will only point to a file, if its a directory you will link the whole directory.

I know that solution but it is not what I need. That way when restarting the link remains on the hard disk

I know that solution but it is not what I need. That way when restarting the link remains on the hard disk

So?

If its in fstab the link will remain until reboot too and be reinit-ed the second the kernel comes up enough to go trough fstab.

It generates problems using "ln -s" that I have difficulty translating into your language. I need fstab. In all distributions it works well as well. I understand that I may be doing something wrong

This sounds wrong on several levels. And seeing the disks get mounted mandatorily anyway you can just use symlinks.

It generates problems using "ln -s" that I have difficulty translating into your language. I need fstab. In all distributions it works well as well. I understand that I may be doing something wrong

Try google translate to describe the problem to me then.

restarting "ln -s" maintains the link. That does not suit me

Why?

You mount your drives forcefully on reboot anyway the way your fstab is made.

So symlinks should go into action later than bind actually.

from Spanish to English do not translate well google translate Creates confusion

is it done to one script after the boot and another in the shutdown?

I have a infinite loop on a bind mount

I don't think this cause for a infinite loop

On a other distributions this problem doesn't already exist

I search on a handbooks

But i don't found a solution

is it done to one script after the boot and another in the shutdown?

No, bind will stay mounted until systemd unmounts. Which is true for symlinks as well because both die with your pc powering off.

On a other distributions this problem doesn't already exist

I just found a thread on ubuntu detailing similar behaviour.

I don't think this cause for a infinite loop

It is. Because you dont use nofail as parameter, causing the boot to stop if anything fails to mount.

It is. Because you dont use nofail as parameter, causing the boot to stop if anything fails to mount.

Can you pass me the link to observe the thread?

Can you pass me the link to observe the thread?

For an old version.

in german nonetheless. XD

Can you pass me the link to observe the thread?

try /home/ubuntu/stuff /home/bob/things auto defaults,nofail,nobootwait,bind 0 0 (space replaced with enter for clarity)

And again, i will recommend you again to use symlinks instead.

xdd already cost me with English. German would not know

Im try some tests

Thanks for your time I'll try some more things

I really like this distribution I would like to stay here to work with her.

It has the bad logo ?

If you have the source for that, I think the right SVG is on the Wikipedia page

If you have the source for that, I think the right SVG is on the Wikipedia page

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines

The logo is used right, but this uses the wrong colors and the white lines run too long. Compare the logo in the wallpaper to the one for this group

We've been trying to find wherever this logo came from and try to remove it from existance, slowly :P

The logo is used right, but this uses the wrong colors and the white lines run too long. Compare the logo in the wallpaper to the one for this group

The baby blue inside the Infinity element.

We've been trying to find wherever this logo came from and try to remove it from existance, slowly :P

LOL

The baby blue inside the Infinity element.

I also think the corner is cut too sharply but I'm not sure on that one

But I know the baby blue and the white line length for the 'f' are wrong

But I know the baby blue and the white line length for the 'f' are wrong

True this ^

We do not support dangerous games and piracy here, so no

Message will be deleted

We do not support dangerous games and piracy here, so no

Banhammer.... pretty please...

The logo is used right, but this uses the wrong colors and the white lines run too long. Compare the logo in the wallpaper to the one for this group

I just found that pic on google. It looks ages old anyway.

Why do people insist lol

Banned

Banned

Yay!

I'm actually surprised noone has drawn a more recent fedora-tan. Tough imho i take it as a sign the distro is more focused and focuses on stability. XD

I'm actually surprised noone has drawn a more recent fedora-tan. Tough imho i take it as a sign the distro is more focused and focuses on stability. XD

The beautiful thing is that it does the bleeding edge stuff so well too...

I'm actually surprised noone has drawn a more recent fedora-tan. Tough imho i take it as a sign the distro is more focused and focuses on stability. XD

I guess the userbase is not focused on that ;)

Speaking of which, have you guys seen the new Ubuntu paint job?

ERROR: S client not available

Speaking of which, have you guys seen the new Ubuntu paint job?

nope, got screens?

nope, got screens?

Not ATM, I got links though..

Meet the Ubuntu 17.10 GNOME Shell Theme http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/ubuntu-17-10-gnome-shell-ambiance

Meet the Improved Ubuntu 17.10 Login Screen http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/09/ubuntu-17-10-login-screen-preview

looks like they did a really decent job at preserving the current Ubuntu's atmosphere

All this makes me a 1000℅ more thankful for Fedora providing unadulterated upstream GNOME...

looks like they did a really decent job at preserving the current Ubuntu's atmosphere

But they don't work with upstream. Yet again. They've forked even gnome extensions.

But they don't work with upstream. Yet again. They've forked even gnome extensions.

That's bad from the community point of view, and I don't approve of it, but I understand how this makes development faster and how having an unique look and feel can help in having a loyal user base (android phone manufacturers provide their modifications into Android for the same reason, I hate it too most of the time but I understand the reasons)

That's bad from the community point of view, and I don't approve of it, but I understand how this makes development faster and how having an unique look and feel can help in having a loyal user base (android phone manufacturers provide their modifications into Android for the same reason, I hate it too most of the time but I understand the reasons)

Yeah, I kinda get it too, but it undermines a lot of good work that has gone into Foss development in general...

Yeah, I kinda get it too, but it undermines a lot of good work that has gone into Foss development in general...

true that. I think the perfect middle ground would be if they would do what they can with merging upstream once they release given version and stabilize their modifications

true that. I think the perfect middle ground would be if they would do what they can with merging upstream once they release given version and stabilize their modifications

This makes me thankful for the awesome work the Fedora, and mageia, and openmandriva devs have done and are doing and have done... Special callout to the distros I prefer; there are plenty of others too....

/me wants to see Fedora on

=)

doesn't look bad

=)

in Spanish there's no "it", only " him" and "her", and it's " la distribución", so he translated it as "work with her"

For all that OS-tans can be a bit weird and creepy, not to mention reinforcing gender stereotypes and so on -- how about this Fedora-tan? :"> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_UqUwVPikChs/SWihsVpAzdI/AAAAAAAAIBo/R-OM4MLVvTM/s1600-h/Linux_tan_fanart__Fedora_by_juzo_kun.jpg

Yes, that's cute, but the "yum" bit doesn't work any more, does it?

luckily I broke it in rawhide ;)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489315

luckily I broke it in rawhide ;)

you broke nothing. you used the wrong tool.

And what the heck, "historical" reasons?

"i want to break my system in the worst possible way" reasons at most.

and why would you want an older dnf?

you broke nothing. you used the wrong tool.

tip: see who reported the bug, and who commented that yum is not the correct tool ;)

The questions apply to the askee of that question then XD