probably just Windows XP Embedded

windows, it said at line 1

Could be ReactOS

https://t.me/reactos/62237 this is

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1723285207850066182?s=20

the comment section makes me to commit warcrimes against those sub room temperature iq idiots meanwhile

yes

"reeeee it's useless"

why even waste your time commenting

attention seeking cucks

https://t.me/reactos/62237 this is

Ah, it's so old photo... There were some guessings it might be just "Frankenstein" from ROS and XP...

https://t.me/reactos/62237 this is

It was mentioned already 6 or more years ago.

https://t.me/reactos/62237 this is

But the fact itself of using it is indeed amazing!

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1723654440693985634?s=20

that really looks way better

even if it's just a simple change

he tried and wine refused to merge(?

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1723702187350749227?t=5ymDfG1Q-QgMJ1hjDCvNXQ&s=19

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1724064582740676902?t=2m7ln5UObc6RUBSLFmEVgg&s=19

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/open-source-windows-project-working-to-integrate-directx-support

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/open-source-windows-project-working-to-integrate-directx-support

On VM?

Why it's not working on my machine in uefi ?

It boots when I try with bios,but there's some problem with my keyboard and mouse input,so not yet usable for me

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/open-source-windows-project-working-to-integrate-directx-support

Wait is this a new release?

Why it's not working on my machine in uefi ?

UEFI support is not completed yet! ⚠️ Only fundamental support is added, but there is no UEFI video driver(s) yet, so it still can't boot correctly.

Wait is this a new release?

No, it's just a Newsletter article, there is no any new release yet.

UEFI support is not completed yet! ⚠️ Only fundamental support is added, but there is no UEFI video driver(s) yet, so it still can't boot correctly.

Oh, I see

No, it's just a Newsletter article, there is no any new release yet.

Okay

UEFI support is not completed yet! ⚠️ Only fundamental support is added, but there is no UEFI video driver(s) yet, so it still can't boot correctly.

It was described more detailed in our VK group. ^^)

It was described more detailed in our VK group. ^^)

Vk?

I'm not on vk though

just read the latest newsletter on the official website

just read the latest newsletter on the official website

Ok

Tech media always essagerates

They need clicks

LMFAO

That's offtopic

Sorry

amateur

:v

Tech media always essagerates

well

you do have uefi boot support, just on specific devices

for now

as it's wip

https://www.heise.de/news/Windows-Alternative-ReactOS-Entwicklung-geht-in-Trippelschritten-weiter-9427480.html

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726243901584126378?t=n8V4tO3uUrKVKFz29SsIBQ&s=19

BREAKING NEWS!!!

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726337727774196073?s=20

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726337727774196073?s=20

OMG!!!! LMFAO

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726337727774196073?s=20

Now reenable fs fat fixing

chkdsk is known to corrupt FAT

Now reenable fs fat fixing

you mean breaking in the current state of chkdisk

chkdsk is known to corrupt FAT

Dat is baaad

But if we make somebody to fix the FS fixing we get Damn Stable ReactOS which boots no matter what!!!

😁😁😁 I am drunk

But if we make somebody to fix the FS fixing we get Damn Stable ReactOS which boots no matter what!!!

You need a journaling-enabled FS for that - the answer is NTFS.

Or BTRS

Current state of Btrfs is regressed and author of the driver refuses to fix 8.3 bug

Yes we could fix chkdsk and reenable it, but that would be a stopgap.

At least we conquered the most critical part!!

😁😁😁 I am drunk

No problem, me not drunk but so happy to see this PR merged finally

No problem, me not drunk but so happy to see this PR merged finally

Me too

Take care of yourself and spread the news wherever you can!

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726361997317480725?s=20

https://vxtwitter.com/reactos/status/1726337727774196073?s=20

oh, super great! Congratulation 🎉

in fact, how does this influence the timeline for 0.4.15?

in fact, how does this influence the timeline for 0.4.15?

This was one of the blockers for branching 0.4.15

We still have a number of regressions

at first i thought it was due to the "server" choice at the setup page

finally get rid of it

Why?

This was one of the blockers for branching 0.4.15

I believe it should be renamed/retageed as 0.5.0

Because it has many more improvements than it was planned for minor realease. And time gap was much longer than 3 months. This should be explained with version number.

I believe it should be renamed/retageed as 0.5.0

that would make sense, and I am interested about opinion of the core team but in the same time, maybe it would make more sense to release a minor release in order to help catch basic bugs, that would annoy in beta

Why?

windows servers login as such

for security issues(?

Uuuh... What?!

i mean the ctrl alt del page

now i know the reason(

Ah I see. Now I get what you mean