Ludovic 'Archivist'
as the yellow zone may only irradiate you as much as working in a plane
Ludovic 'Archivist'
This is why, please, when you make a diagram or a chart or anything visual, have a bit of deontology and try to no make it output inaccurate information
Ludovic 'Archivist'
As for me that kind of bullshitery is enough for me to fire someone
Kirub
Pease try to do my assignment in c++ Do simple project using if else switch case for loop and while loop
Stefan
i mean, with for loop/while loop and an if function
Stefan
you are controlling a turing machine man
منال
Hi
Ludovic 'Archivist'
badly is understatement
It is not SO dramatic since it was aimed at proffessionals, but whenever a mundane human comes accross it they start getting shaky and try to sue you for $40M
Kirub
Is not class assignment
Ludovic 'Archivist'
you are controlling a turing machine man
so can you with pattern matching and functions too
Stefan
so can you with pattern matching and functions too
you already have the foundation to create lambda
Stefan
why not
Ludovic 'Archivist'
you already have the foundation to create lambda
It is harder not to achieve turing completeness than to
Anonymous
Why competitive programer write bad code , good code need more time ?
Its not the fault of the competitive programmers that they end up writing bad code. Its the demand of this sport and they are forced to do so. For example, its a good practise to divide the code into various functions/methods for clarity but if you try to do that in competitive programming, due to higher number of function calls, time limt will exceed and your code won't be accepted. Though its my opinion, but at the same time I don't seem to like competitive programming myself.
Ludovic 'Archivist'
unless you are in real life
منال
I want the c++ app
Stefan
you just need a movable tape and a way to determine the truthy of such things
Ludovic 'Archivist'
you just need a movable tape and a way to determine the truthy of such things
Yeah, the issue is just that life ain't ever give you an actual infinite one xD
Ariana
Why competitive programer write bad code , good code need more time ?
Have you seen how bad my code can get when im under serious time pressure
Ludovic 'Archivist'
enter random access machine
Enter the reality of physics xD
Ariana
Like you dont want to see code that is written with 5 mins left
Kirub
You can not do this simple problem Please change this group image
Stefan
Enter the reality of physics xD
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random-access_machine The RAM's equivalent of the universal Turing machine – with its program in the registers as well as its data – is called the random-access stored-program machine or RASP. It is an example of the so-called von Neumann architecture and is closest to the common notion of computer.
Stefan
speaking of reality of physics you are probably saying QTEs in CPU design
Ariana
can we already use analog 😛
Stefan
that's why intel couldn't get 10nm
Ludovic 'Archivist'
speaking of reality of physics you are probably saying QTEs in CPU design
Well, in general physics don't quite like infinity
Ariana
i disagree
Ludovic 'Archivist'
you can't even be infinitely small
Stefan
you can't even be infinitely small
flavors of elementary particles?
Stefan
well im no physics people
Ludovic 'Archivist'
flavors of elementary particles?
no, quantum relativity limitations, things cannot be smaller than plank length and you cannot measure a time smaller than plank time
Stefan
yes
Stefan
physics is actually flawed
Stefan
scientifism is based on correlation
Ariana
Ariana
jk
Ludovic 'Archivist'
likewise, an item of mass n can only process as much information as contained on the surface of the black hole of same mass
Stefan
and physics use it hugely
Stefan
one of the biggest problem is uncertainty principle
Stefan
that actually implies nondeterminism in core
Ludovic 'Archivist'
one of the biggest problem is uncertainty principle
uncertainty priciple have nothing uncertain tho
Ariana
It is not a problem
Ariana
It is an extremely basic mathematical result
Ludovic 'Archivist'
that actually implies nondeterminism in core
No, it implies thing is hard to measure
Ariana
It states that the time an event occured and frequency of the event cant both be measured precisely
Ariana
It is not hard
Ariana
It is mathematically unsound and impossible
Ludovic 'Archivist'
No
i was doing a simplification of the main idea
Ludovic 'Archivist'
It is mathematically unsound and impossible
It is possible but destroys the information
Ariana
I find the word ‘hard’ a bit of understatement cuz it suggests its possible tbh
Ariana
Like lets say i ask you what time an event occured
Stefan
if you need to record the dynamical state of something, you need to touch it or it is never to be seen and a little touch would certainly change the state entirely
Ariana
Then i ask whats the frequency of the event
Ariana
What the uncertainty principle really is is that you cannot know the frequency and time of an event simultaneously
Ariana
Just that its in phase space and stuff
Ariana
So the argument is flawed
Stefan
Ludovic 'Archivist'
The smaller you get, the more enormous the energy required to measure too
Ariana
Idts
Ariana
electrons, in qm, are infinitely small
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Ariana
Dirac equation assumes so