Yeah

It's a long way I think

Probably

to write good codes to be better programer

You want to be a Clean Coder :D

You want to be a Clean Coder :D

really really

but many times I can't

you're writing qt programs and im self employed...ironic

Ask in

#ot

/warn ot

you're writing qt programs and im self employed...ironic

you are also qt programer？

you are also qt programer？

no

but definite qt users

justkdethings

What the fuck did I do? Huh

qt is popular these ...days

you techincally can't

What the fuck did I do? Huh

Is written there

but you can try and dump its embedded NVMe chip

but many times I can't

What?

You can't write good code?

You can't write good code?

Many times I don't know what is good code even to write it

Many times I don't know what is good code even to write it

actually no such thing

Many times I don't know what is good code even to write it

I'm reading a nice book, Clean Code. You can give it a try

purely subjective, no objective metric

old people like global state because they're, well, adapted to it, or they make great money with global state despite not knowing how harmful it is

"Old people" lel

purely subjective, no objective metric

There is good code and bad code

I'm reading a nice book, Clean Code. You can give it a try

It was recommended in my office but I have not read it yet

"Old people" lel

ask the people who've written bison/yacc

and see how shitty is tcc's internal code

ask the people who've written bison/yacc

There are also "old people" who write good and modern code.

There is good code and bad code

i refute to give responses

There are also "old people" who write good and modern code.

Nice old people

There are also "old people" who write good and modern code.

tell me, why are compilers non-reentrant at the beginning

tell me, why are compilers non-reentrant at the beginning

Ask the author not me. But this has nothing to do with the fact that there are "old people" who can write good code.

I read many books about effective and clean and standard code ,but they are useful when write a free function but when do project may oop is useful

Ask the author not me. But this has nothing to do with the fact that there are "old people" who can write good code.

again, there's no definite conception of "good code"

just purely speculative and personal stuff

again, there's no definite conception of "good code"

There is

There is

i can argue recursive code is beautiful

int a,b,c,d; Will never be good code

some people find dynamic programming good i dont

int a,b,c,d; Will never be good code

i always do

under urgency

int a,b,c,d; Will never be good code

Yep

under urgency

So you write bad code under urgency

No problem, but it is bad code anyway

So you write bad code under urgency

then all competitive programmers are writing bad code yeah, i agree, literally not sarcastic

then all competitive programmers are writing bad code yeah, i agree, literally not sarcastic

Yes. Usually you (not you) think bad code will help you go faster

int a,b,c,d; Will never be good code

unless you are following a math paper (source included) which specifically uses those variables

then you *might* get away with it

then all competitive programmers are writing bad code yeah, i agree, literally not sarcastic

they are

competitive programming is 1) a joke 2) not about writing good code

they are

yeah, i usually dont know what the top 10's are writing in their solution

yeah, i usually dont know what the top 10's are writing in their solution

i don't care about competitive programming

competitive programmers are not good programmers

they are techies or mathematicians at best

competitive programmers are not good programmers

yooooo that's too hasty

yooooo that's too hasty

those who only do competitive, atleast

they are techies or mathematicians at best

but it is necessary to use them as a way to get interview chances

competitive programmers are not good programmers

You can do competitive and be a good coder. But it's really hard and you need to be very good and exercised

Why competitive programer write bad code , good code need more time ？

You can do competitive and be a good coder. But it's really hard and you need to be very good and exercised

sadly, the people who can have both side balanced is very rare, under my observation

Why competitive programer write bad code , good code need more time ？

its very fucking pressured

you had 3 hours to finish 5 questions that are very fucking challenging

Why competitive programer write bad code , good code need more time ？

Nope. Good code needs exercise, hard training and good problem solving

Nope. Good code needs exercise, hard training and good problem solving

This

Nope. Good code needs exercise, hard training and good problem solving

Plus a good organized way to write the code you want to write

😜ོ

I never did something like competetive. Is this such a big thing in USA etc?

the reason is that comp programming requires you tentative algorithm knowledges and people who likes algorithms doesnt care about code style because they only seek them as tools to achieve a mathematical goal

I never did something like competetive. Is this such a big thing in USA etc?

pretty big in china here

Hmm I see

you know, the always-second-place -after-russia

Here in India too..

well China has many programers write good codes

😕

both china and india have some awful programmers