Ludovic 'Archivist'
they take the volume of their information
Ariana
huh
Ariana
That is GR alr
Ariana
its kinda like
Ariana
Opposite of QM and really hates it
Ariana
ok should go ot
Ariana
#ot
Stefan
since classical computers are based on electrons, and that intel are fucked by physics, its valid
Ludovic 'Archivist'
since classical computers are based on electrons, and that intel are fucked by physics, its valid
Meanwhile ARM CPUs reach very comparable performance with 4 times the engraving size
Stefan
Meanwhile ARM CPUs reach very comparable performance with 4 times the engraving size
arm vs x86 are you joking
Stefan
Stefan
again, risc = "relegate interesting stuff to compilers"
Stefan
therefore those so called "benchmarks" are completely bulls because their instruction set/pipeline is designed differently
Dima
lol
Stefan
the optimization is done differently already, e.g. prebranching in arm
Stefan
so it can already favor some cpus
Stefan
well, kinda off
Ludovic 'Archivist'
therefore those so called "benchmarks" are completely bulls because their instruction set/pipeline is designed differently
I don't look at benchmarks, I look at real applications
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Of course benchmarks are shit
Stefan
its better to go battle royale mode😂
Stefan
#off
Anonymous
Can anyone explain me typedef?
Stefan
alias a type with a name
Stefan
typedef <type> <name>
Stefan
but the rule is different for arrays and (function) pointers
Stefan
and some atrocities like typedef void (*myfunc)(int a, int b) do exist
Stefan
therefore, if you can use at least c++11
Stefan
learn using instead
Dima
I am moving my code from typedefs to usings lol
Dima
looks a lot more sexier
Stefan
template <class T>
using UnaryPredicate = bool (*)(const T &x);
Anonymous
Isnt c with classes just C++? I read somewhere that it used to be called C with classes but bjarne changed the bame
Nameful
Isnt c with classes just C++? I read somewhere that it used to be called C with classes but bjarne changed the bame
It's not quite that simple
Anonymous
Why newbyte?
Nameful
I'm not the best person to answer this, but C++ has other differences from C than the classes
Mat
Anonymous
But is it true that C++ used to be called C with classes?
Nameful
I've heard "C with classes" before, that's for sure
Francisco
Well, C++ also has templates, which are quite important
Nameful
And namespaces
Francisco
And lambdas (why not?)
Nameful
Oh yeah, that too
Francisco
And almost arbitrary compile-time execution
Francisco
You can execute a lot of stuff at compile time
Francisco
At the beginning, constexpr functions could only be recursive. Now you can define functions as constexpr with any code inside
Francisco
In the future we may have allocations at compile time
Dima
LEC
TERRY
Can someone start with me
Am new in de group
TERRY
C++
Pavel
C++
Ask your questions and someone probably will answer (not guaranteed, but you can try anyway)
klimi
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Dima
np Kurimi
klimi
Welcome
Anonymous
What is so dangerous about C functions such as fgets or fflush?
klimi
What is so dangerous about C functions such as fgets or fflush?
What have you gathered so far?
Anonymous
What I have gathered is a bit vague. That it can cause stack overflows I believe, and that fflush acts unexpectedly
Anonymous
Be my question is why?
Anonymous
But what does it mean exactly to not have protection?
BinaryByter
In the future we may have allocations at compile time
Just alloc a lot of memory at startup
Francisco
Just alloc a lot of memory at startup
The idea is when you need that memory only at compile time