Wow! That's extreme!

That is the basic thing we can do

Very basic

Yes, I understand your point.

The ultimatum is, the administrator access in windows . . no password at all . .plus all these new ransomwares . . they encrypt the files . . imagine your boot encrypted with windows administrator access and you don't know the decryption key

How beautiful would it be

Just imagine what would happen if windows can have access to my directory in which have a viruses collection.

Just imagine what would happen if windows can have access to my directory in which have a viruses collection.

It would be beautiful . . we will all start using testdisk ??

Done with installing and setting up moms new PC :)

No, I'm talking about when you are running windows and the partition in which linux is installed can be accesed directly from a windows sesion.

You can already. There are already open source and proprietary ext4 drivers existing for Windows.

Ext2Fsd

Also Paragon

Ext2IFS (IIRC)

The day this happens, I will completely wipe put my HDD , just to make sure no windows stay , completely encrypt and never say Microsoft again.

I wish I could have a notebook with eSATA port. This will mean, I can install "Шindows (pronounced Shindows) for Games" without touching my main HDD. And main HDD can be dm-crypted...

The ultimatum is, the administrator access in windows . . no password at all . .plus all these new ransomwares . . they encrypt the files . . imagine your boot encrypted with windows administrator access and you don't know the decryption key

/boot is not a problem. Because it can be easily restored using LiveCD. This is just kernels and boot information.

The real shit can happen, if such ransomware can have a write access to /home, or on /.

Yep. I did it. I just don't like the fact, what such awesome thing like flatpak, can't into plugins... https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/90

You really love that sticker, don't you? :)

wrong chat sorry

wrong chat sorry

Just delete it.

Just imagine what would happen if windows can have access to my directory in which have a viruses collection.

Why should anyone have that?

You can already. There are already open source and proprietary ext4 drivers existing for Windows.

Where do I find them?

Where do I find them?

Google? Seriously, you have the names.

Yes, you're right. I'm sorry, I'm sleepy. Pretend I said nothing

I am trying to host file using appache my files are place in /var/www/html i am able to access on my machine but not from any other machine connected to my router

I have *:80 in my conf file

And firewall is adjusted to listen and allow request

#helpneeded

@voidspacexyz

@jflory

interesting

can you share the conf file ?

Conf/http.conf?

yes

Also the output of sudo netstat -tulnp | grep apache

Cool

Let the conf file hold

what is output of that command

http://paste.fedoraproject.org/374454/14650632

conf file

conf looks good

I need the output of netstat

http://paste.fedoraproject.org/374456/63335146

netstat

Also the output of sudo netstat -tulnp | grep apache

This one . . Just paste the output here

it doest give me anything

Okie

so I think I got the problem

your httpd is not running

start your httpd and it should be good

its running :P

http://paste.fedoraproject.org/374456/63335146

Also not sure, if you look at line 11, httpd is running in ipV6 . .

tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 31387/httpd

not sure why that is happening

tcp6 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN 31387/httpd

ipv6 . . not ipv4 . . it is saying tcp6

not tcp

ohhh !

Just change the listen directive to 0.0.0.0:80

that might work

and restart ofcourse

http://www.orangepi.org/

Oops sorry . .

wrong link

ERROR: S client not available

now its running on tcp

but stll the same

now lets come to the firewall

just to make sure that is the issue, can you stop firewall and see if that works

Did that work ?

yes

firewall it is my friend

:P

so fix your firewall now ?

ha ha ?

hahahh

i am okay with off and on

also, just to make sure the apache fix was right, can you now revert back the listen directive just to *:80 and have the firewall stopped, restart apache

and see if that works

i am okay with off and on

I am not okie with it off . . . I usually run it clean . . and make the required permissions

Its never good to run without firewalld according to me

explain me why it didnt work with tcp6?

and how did it fix it ?

explain me why it didnt work with tcp6?

You were trying to access apache over tcp when it was running in tcp6 . . different ip ranges

so if you had to access it over ipv6, you cant use 192.168 . . :80 . ?? that aint work,

but instead you should find your ipv6 address and access it with that

like 2001:0db8:0000:0042:0000:8a2e:0370:80

also, just to make sure the apache fix was right, can you now revert back the listen directive just to *:80 and have the firewall stopped, restart apache

did you try this ?

i am on it

@voidspacexyz fixed

added rules to my zone

/

Sorry

added port and ip range

cool

also, just to make sure the apache fix was right, can you now revert back the listen directive just to *:80 and have the firewall stopped, restart apache

This one right ?