64gb is overkill

Make boot 1GB at least.

Fedora tends to keep 3 last kernels there.

if you have let's say a file like /var/log/apache2/access.log that gets heavy you can just move it to home and make a symlink

32gb will do

hmm , Ok

thx for the advises

[user@telegram ~]$ sudo du -sk /boot 12852 /boot

kernels don't reside at boot

they're on /usr/lib/modules

/boot doesn't need even 300mb

[user@telegram /]$ sudo du -sk /usr/lib/modules 148506 /usr/lib/modules

My /boot has 181MB taken.

kernels have 148mb and my boot has 12mb

My /boot has 181MB taken.

how did you do that? =P

I didn't. All Fedora.

I didn't touch my /boot partition a single time.

i'm on qubes, let me check the hypervisor

yep, i have 200mb

for ~22mb each initramfs, i'd say 1gb is still too much

I'd say that better have 1GB there than not.

Unless every MB counts.

on a 200gb drive, you could set /home reserved quota to 1% and "get back" much more than 1gb, so that's fair.

but i wouldn't make boot larger than 300mb anyway

I ran into many situations when even 512MB for /boot wasn't enough. Especially when you are experimenting with kernels.

seems very specific

but i wouldn't make boot larger than 300mb anyway

If you plan to upgrade without fresh installing, then 1GB is mandatory for /boot

If you plan to upgrade without fresh installing, then 1GB is mandatory for /boot

Nah It works just fine for me at 500mb

Nah It works just fine for me at 500mb

If you make a research you will find plenty of Fedora won't upgrade, Anaconda claim there is not enough space, 1GB is required , 1GB for /boot doesn't hurt, sure later there will be some BS at /home using those other 512MB or even more as free space.

I dont need to research. It works for me. Im sure others have ran into issues Im simply saying its case by case.

I dont fall udner that catagory anaconda warns me of nothing.

I dont fall udner that catagory anaconda warns me of nothing.

It is not about you.

Never said it was, but a 1gb /boot is not nessisary clearly.

Never said it was, but a 1gb /boot is not nessisary clearly.

Tell that to Anaconda... or you happen to be an Anaconda dev, in that case I will trust you.

If ive done it on 4+ machines so far with only a 512mb boo partition. It clearly isnt mandatory, is what I am saying.

Especially if you actually clean our your kernels every once and a while.

If ive done it on 4+ machines so far with only a 512mb boo partition. It clearly isnt mandatory, is what I am saying.

Again, your user case or experience is not the rule.

Especially if you actually clean our your kernels every once and a while.

Bad advice.

If there is a rule then anacoda doesnt adhear to it for everyone.

anaconda*

And doesnt follow their own "rule"

If there is a rule then anacoda doesnt adhear to it for everyone.

Happy to see you agreed you are not everyone.

Never claimed that only you have.

I'd anyway recommend 1GB. Because that would make you lot less like to encount any problems with it's size. :)

I'd anyway recommend 1GB. Because that would make you lot less like to encount any problems with it's size. :)

Sweet

:)

I'd anyway recommend 1GB. Because that would make you lot less like to encount any problems with it's size. :)

This ^

Clementine is simply perfect IMHO.

Clementine sounds like a music player more than video player, I installed it once, it couldn't run any format of videos

How is everything here???

Fine, thanks, polishing my photos. And you?

Clementine sounds like a music player more than video player, I installed it once, it couldn't run any format of videos

Yes, you're right, sorry, I got confused. For videos I use Gnome Videos (Totem). Or whatever comes by default.

Yes, you're right, sorry, I got confused. For videos I use Gnome Videos (Totem). Or whatever comes by default.

VLC++

Sorry for the confusion @GhAliesh Someone said VLC, and this program plays both, music and video, and as I rarely watch videos my mind jumped immediately to audio files. Hence the confusion and wrong advise.

Yo, @Kohane, what do you use for RAW files from camera processing?

Darktable or Gimp. Gimp has a module to handle RAW files.

I'm assuming you're asking about Linux. In Windows or Mac should be Lightroom.

Yup, Linux.

Shotwell doesn't work with Fujifilm RAW any good.

Sorry for the confusion @GhAliesh Someone said VLC, and this program plays both, music and video, and as I rarely watch videos my mind jumped immediately to audio files. Hence the confusion and wrong advise.

No worries ms, I use xine and vlc, they work fine except vlc crashes sometimes

Gonna look at Darktable.

Yup, Linux.

Run adobe lightroom on wine, u won't regret it

Shotwell doesn't work with Fujifilm RAW any good.

No, of course not. Shotwell is not meant to be a complex tool. Rather small, simple fixes.

Run adobe lightroom on wine, u won't regret it

What is the top working version?

Run adobe lightroom on wine, u won't regret it

I've been told is very good. But I'm still at a loss to why would I want RAW files at all.

I run RAW+JPEG usually. Gets me a JPEG for quick stuff and RAW to tinker with.

What is the top working version?

My housemate has CC 2015 and according to him is very good.

I run RAW+JPEG usually. Gets me a JPEG for quick stuff and RAW to tinker with.

Oh, I'll look into this. The cameras I use aren't mine but of a friend that is a professional. Both are Nikkon, so I guess they should have this feature too.

ERROR: S client not available

What is the top working version?

CS 6 or CC 2016

Coming back from the market, so tired and bored

You're bored? Imagine how I am with *two* days of doing nothing and everything is closed and no transport except my feet.

I've been told is very good. But I'm still at a loss to why would I want RAW files at all.

Well, it's good just in case u need it

You're bored? Imagine how I am with *two* days of doing nothing and everything is closed and no transport except my feet.

Read a book. :)

I am rarely bored.

Read a book. :)

That's a good advice. Thanks.

Well, it's good just in case u need it

It doesn't work 100% tho, you know wine was meant to run games rather than complex apps like adobe suite

I'm trying to fix some of my photos. Sadly, my hands were trembling too much last time I used a camera. @gwindor

It doesn't work 100% tho, you know wine was meant to run games rather than complex apps like adobe suite

Yeah, I don't have this issue just because my housemate has a nice machine running photographers stuff. So when I need the Adobe Suite I ask him permission and use his PC. The rest of time I'm comfortably sitting on my laptop.

Yeah, I don't have this issue just because my housemate has a nice machine running photographers stuff. So when I need the Adobe Suite I ask him permission and use his PC. The rest of time I'm comfortably sitting on my laptop.

Yes lucky you fedora isn't impressing for him, otherwise u'll have so much pain using adobe with wine :c

Darktable looks like something I need! Thanks, @Kohane.

Darktable looks like something I need! Thanks, @Kohane.

Welcome. Glad to help!

Yes lucky you fedora isn't impressing for him, otherwise u'll have so much pain using adobe with wine :c

He barely uses his computer, so it's pointless to talk to him about Linux or Open Source. Luckily, he does listen to my security advises.

Looks like Lightroom, isn't it?

Looks like Lightroom, isn't it?

It's Darktable. :)

I know it's Darktable

I meant that the interface is pretty similar.

Oh. Idk what Lightroom looks like. :)

Oh. Idk what Lightroom looks like. :)

Something like that, if I correctly recall. I don't use it myself, my housemate, Henry, uses it. But he also uses like 5 or 6 programs more so maybe I'm mistaken.

He barely uses his computer, so it's pointless to talk to him about Linux or Open Source. Luckily, he does listen to my security advises.

I need 5 minutes to convince my class mates to use fedora, we are studying IT engineering so using the terminal isn't so bad, but when it comes to persuad normal user to give up on all those games, applications etc in.windows, it's impossible IMHO

No, he doesn't play games. I use his computer a lot more than himself.

But Adobe is Adobe. And that's all about.

So, back to VMWare problem. Now it all of the sudden loads all cores of my CPU at 100% (even though VM running should only use one) and VM crashes. :/

Wait, wtf.

Why does VMWare Workstation's RAM is in buff/cache zone and is increasing so fast?..

Ah... dunno. I never use VM. sorry. I can't help you this time, @gwindor

htop says that 4.3GB ram reserved by Workstation, but total used is 1.53GB.

So, back to VMWare problem. Now it all of the sudden loads all cores of my CPU at 100% (even though VM running should only use one) and VM crashes. :/

eheh, it's normal in my rig

can you send the setting of your guest?