It had a Problem with it at the beginning

You're right, but AFAIK after that they changed their mind and now they even provide an easy way to change trademarks in rebuilt packages

So, if I write: sudo systemctl start do<tab><tab> bash returns this: sudo systemctl start doUnit boot.mount could not be found. cker.service Unit boot.mount could not be found. Unit boot.mount could not be found. Display all 230 possibilities? (y or n) ~ ] sudo systemctl start docker.service [sudo] password for pionen: This is a bug righ?

Depends on your shell and your autocompletion

Michał @Wolfshappen Thank you very much. Now I understand better.

@alexove you can find my progress on github, https://github.com/michalrud/renjin/tree/fedora-patches , even though still I have at least one compilation error to fix; unfortunately I had no time to look at this today nor yesterday

I will check it later, thanks Michal :-)

Welcome aboard @NAuliajati, @umriye and @dmike16 :)

Hi @rootalcatraz welcome!

HI thanks!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C31OPYMm88w

jeje

Depends on your shell and your autocompletion

I'm using bash.

I'm using bash.

Well, I try with bash and the services are not autocompleted. With zsh the completion is ok

>> zsh ❤❤❤

Hi all; been away for weeks, geeks, 32 bit hear and very neat!

COPR

Hello all, anyone knows about a framework or platform for SaaS software?

SaaS is a mode for delivery some cloud 'cloud' service

OpenShif origin?

An example of SaaS can be the Google Apps, Gmail, etc

OpenShift is PaaS

Hello all, anyone knows about a framework or platform for SaaS software?

? U have to write ur own. For that u can use web frameworks like rails or Django

It provides to the user a complete development/deployment evironment including some programming languages

Also you can use node.js, etc etc,

IaaS, SaaS, PaaS are modes of delivery of the cloud services

Well, I try with bash and the services are not autocompleted. With zsh the completion is ok

I get services completion using bash

You got installed bash-completion?

OpenShift is PaaS

Yes, you asked for a platform

What do you want exactly

?

Really 'Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis' is asking for a framework to build a SaaS Software...

I don't need build the web application :) In anyway Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis, first you need to choose a language, if you have skills in pyrhon maybe you can choose Django or Flask. if you use JavaScript you can use angular.js, etc.

Later, if you need a platform to build your web applications to deliver them as SaaS you can use OpenShift (a very cool platform). But isn't easy to adopt

Really 'Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis' is asking for a framework to build a SaaS Software...

But that's a bad question

I mean, what kind of SaaS? The first thing is what problem do I want to solve. But not SaaS because that means nothing

Sure, I agree with you

That's just how you bill your app but that's the smallest problem

Cloud, IaaS, SaaS, PaaS... Maybe these buzzwords are confusing for the most people ?

Cloud, IaaS, SaaS, PaaS... Maybe these buzzwords are confusing for the most people ?

Actually those aren't buzzwords

They're well defined concepts

I know, but are used as buzzwords

As John Rhoton says on one of their books, the 'Cloud' word, on the IT field, may have many meaning... ? Alex Irmel Oviedo Solis, don't worry with Fedora you can do it ?

There is no cloud , only another person's computer , the cloud is a lie

There is no cloud , only another person's computer , the cloud is a lie

Yeah, this is the real definition ?

Maybe 'cloud' is the computer of someone else, but with this paradigm you can abstract from the underlying hardware

If you have a bunch of servers you can build your private cloud, and isn't more the someone else computer. (Specially on Universities, Research Centres, etc, etc.)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenStack ;)

For me „cloud” was always this thingy in visio diagrams that represented „the stuff we don’t need to worry about right now”

/names@TeledoraBot

/names@TeledoraBot

/names@TeledoraBot

Hallo @Aubyoub welcome here

okay guys and girls I have a question from the "which distro to use" genre, but this time is't a bit more complicated as I have: - 32-bit ~500MHz processor - 256MB RAM - 256MB hdd with no real way to change it (other than using an USB flash drive maybe) No need for graphical interface. I am at the point of thinking about rolling something myself with yocto :D

AntiX

Maybe Puppy

Or Debian Stable with something like i3 as WM

AnitX looks promising

I got an old HP t5000 on a charity auction and now I see how hard it is to find anything that would fit on a 256MB drive

here the "core" install is 190MB

Hi

Hi

hi

Hallo @Aubyoub welcome here

Thnx ?

Does someone knows about a opensuse group?

okay guys and girls I have a question from the "which distro to use" genre, but this time is't a bit more complicated as I have: - 32-bit ~500MHz processor - 256MB RAM - 256MB hdd with no real way to change it (other than using an USB flash drive maybe) No need for graphical interface. I am at the point of thinking about rolling something myself with yocto :D

ERROR: S client not available

okay guys and girls I have a question from the "which distro to use" genre, but this time is't a bit more complicated as I have: - 32-bit ~500MHz processor - 256MB RAM - 256MB hdd with no real way to change it (other than using an USB flash drive maybe) No need for graphical interface. I am at the point of thinking about rolling something myself with yocto :D

Arch linux or slackware

Arch linux or slackware

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Why not ?

Arch Linux is dropping 32 bit.

Arch linux or slackware

Does slackware have a real package manager nowadays?

Arch Linux is dropping 32 bit.

multilib for what ?

multilib for what ?

No.

No.

what no ?

multilib for what ?

I need to run it on 32bit processor, multilib won't cut it

I need to run it on 32bit processor, multilib won't cut it

This.

I need to run it on 32bit processor, multilib won't cut it

u need install and run OS on 32bit processor ?

Arch Linux won't support 32 bit architectures any more. Which means it will be impossible to install it on 32 bit processors, to begin with.

okay guys and girls I have a question from the "which distro to use" genre, but this time is't a bit more complicated as I have: - 32-bit ~500MHz processor - 256MB RAM - 256MB hdd with no real way to change it (other than using an USB flash drive maybe) No need for graphical interface. I am at the point of thinking about rolling something myself with yocto :D

It's been stated here...

oh, to old laptop ?

oh, to old laptop ?

hp t5000 ;)

oh, how i can donate u ? XD

*joke*

Arch Linux won't support 32 bit architectures any more. Which means it will be impossible to install it on 32 bit processors, to begin with.

Which is sad as hell

so why i wont try gentoo ?

Which is sad as hell

Shrug. Nobody should be using 32 bit anymore, anyway.

Shrug. Nobody should be using 32 bit anymore, anyway.

Like I have a choice.

UMPC is 32bit, terminal is 32bit.

u will win about 2% of perfomance

I got this thin client on an charity auction, and I find it fun to play with it :P

Like I have a choice.

You represent less than 0.1% of the IT consuming population. It's time to move on.

You represent less than 0.1% of the IT consuming population. It's time to move on.

You'd be surprised. Not everyone is living in USA, EU and other rich countries yet still they are IT consuming people.

You represent less than 0.1% of the IT consuming population. It's time to move on.

There are many users in less developed countries, and some schools which have old computers.

You'd be surprised. Not everyone is living in USA, EU and other rich countries yet still they are IT consuming people.

I'm aware. And no. My statement remains. The percentage of people still on 32 bit processors is REALLY small.

I'm aware. And no. My statement remains. The percentage of people still on 32 bit processors is REALLY small.

Nobody calculated. As for me, it's very large.

I see much more 32bit only hardware being used than 32-64