just every time I like it less and less. I'm not saying that she's bad. It does its job. The first time after specifying and partitioning the partitions, I pressed the Done button, and went back, instead of logically going forward, and I did not understand what happened to my partitions. Only when I hoped for the best to click "Start installation" and saw that the sections are being formatted, I was released by a terrible feeling of unknown garbage. For all this time I have got used to this installer, however it is absolutely not informative during each of steps. such a scarcity of the description of processes discourages beginners, it seems to me.

Здравствуйте, извините за беспокойство, мы команда разработчиков (30 человек) с Южной Кореи, учимся в г. Владивостоке, имеем колоссальный опыт в программировании, готовы сотрудничать.

I think this is the sort of spambot

Welcome!

No. I just checked the official Fedora chromium src rpm and it has it's own sets of custom patches which are incompatible with the *freeworld* versions. The freeworld version is upstreamed which is disabled by default and it has been strictly indicated in the spec file to not to enable this on official Fedora builds.

Again, the freeworld patches have to be compiled against every chromium version, however its accomplished. Thus the codecs will kill chromium to start after an update-but-not-codec-update.

Why not bundle codecs with the package? Let chromium use bundled codecs instead of the system codecs and I'm saying this because, once libva is enabled chromium can directly use va capabilities of gpu driver without need to access system codecs. Or this have to do with proprietary codecs rule that US based open source companies are following?

This is a large part of the reason rpmfusion exists - it has ffmpeg (need to pay for every user), telegram (using ffmpeg), mpv (uses ffmpeg), vlc (uses ffmpeg)....

curl wttr.in

This is a large part of the reason rpmfusion exists - it has ffmpeg (need to pay for every user), telegram (using ffmpeg), mpv (uses ffmpeg), vlc (uses ffmpeg)....

Need to pay? Sorry?

I need a "insist on open formats" sticker with the logos of opus, webm, webp, vp9 and ogg theora XD

I need a "insist on open formats" sticker with the logos of opus, webm, webp, vp9 and ogg theora XD

VP8/9 is nice to have when H264/5 aren't available, though I thankfully am not in that predicament often.

For me their performance is subpar (in terms of encoding/transcoding times to file size and quality) to H264/5, but they're useful to have regardless.

Then you've set wrong params on vp9 - it can be as efficient and at the same visual quality as h265.

Not at all. I've done plenty of tests and read the documentation on it. In theory this should be the case, but in practice it is not. Not for me anyway, efficiency-wise.

We encode videos for websites and vp9 usually gets preference for us as it comes out smaller.

I encode videos for YouTube and I typically see longer encoding times with no gain for VP9 than I do with H265. It's not a large margin, but enough for me to just use H265.

Aw, else youtube can serve videos to everyone instantly. This way you force youtube to convert to vp9 itself, which it only does after a certain interest from users.

Is there any website which uses vp9 apart from YouTube?

@buredoRUNofthecyborg :3

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheHackersNews/~3/QKcLYjgD6Tw/intel-meltdown-spectre-patch.html

Also, please post the source? No need to give google tracking data.

Thats... several days old now. XD

What's Fedora gonna do, btw?

What's Fedora gonna do, btw?

They reverted the patches

Keep calm, retpoline on and reject intel being intel.

They reverted the patches

No. RHEL reverted, not Fedora.

Fedora haven't yet?

Fedora has both patched kernel and microcode. It won't be reverted.

Oh. :(

Everything works fine on Fedora. Don't worry.

No. RHEL reverted, not Fedora.

They wont patch processors of more than 5 years right

What's Fedora gonna do, btw?

As far as I can tell, they're still testing so we're safe. They didn't release the patch straight away.

Fedora is not directly related to RHEL

Hello

where is official recommendation, how to trim SSD? By fstrim / or by discard option in fstab? I saw also fstrim.timer, but can't understand, is it sufficient to run fstrim weekly?