Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

Very nice HAHAH

Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

Why do you need an app for something that a quick google search provides?

Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

#Winning ?

Why do you need an app for something that a quick google search provides?

And something which can be so easily scripted

Sadly only few websites make that easy and offer native apis

Letting Fedora handle it. Some ssds do not allow for use of the fast and cheap fstrim commands without loosing data so fedora will auto-choose the right fstrim setting for you.

In my installation fstrim disabled and no discard options by default :(

In my installation fstrim disabled and no discard options by default :(

That strongly sounds like you have an ssd that might loose data when that is enabled then. Do you have a Samsung 750/850 series?

In my installation fstrim disabled and no discard options by default :(

Oh and discard won't be in the fstab by default, fstrim.timer is responsible for continouus improvement and should run automatically. If your ssd is one of those that would die when fstrim is used in the cheap async variant it will choose the synchronous one when your pc is in low load so you dont get hit with a 10 second i/o halt.

That strongly sounds like you have an ssd that might loose data when that is enabled then. Do you have a Samsung 750/850 series?

No, it's Intel 520 Series SSD

No, it's Intel 520 Series SSD

If fstrim.timer isnt already enabled you can manually do so then

But i'd advise to stay off the discard option, for performance and data safety.

I add discard option in fstab, because SSD without TRIM will be slow... I don't like sudden run fstrim and some unexpected load :(

But i'd advise to stay off the discard option, for performance and data safety.

Thank you, I'll remove option... When I run at Gentoo, fstrim was unofficial and not recommended way, instead of discard

Why do you need an app for something that a quick google search provides?

I don't like wasting time on selecting wallpapers that's why I use wallpaper of the day from bing(old Lumia habit)

I don't like wasting time on selecting wallpapers that's why I use wallpaper of the day from bing(old Lumia habit)

Aw, I liked those.

I miss seeing them :3

Are there any surprises when converting root from ext4 to xfs? I think there were some problems when I just copied, changed the file system and returned files back, the grub did not see the xfs module ...

Are there any surprises when converting root from ext4 to xfs? I think there were some problems when I just copied, changed the file system and returned files back, the grub did not see the xfs module ...

Grub has likely seen it but the identification for the drive likely failed because its uuid changed or lvm didnt know that that was root anymore.

The only thing you should leave as-is is /boot tough.

Grub has likely seen it but the identification for the drive likely failed because its uuid changed or lvm didnt know that that was root anymore.

No, I'm sure, that is module problem... I'm migrating from btrfs to xfs, but grub can't load xfs module and I did it on ext4... But I don't remember, may be this is Gentoo problem (my handmade kernel)...

I don't like wasting time on selecting wallpapers that's why I use wallpaper of the day from bing(old Lumia habit)

So I read in Fedora Magazine today tht tgere are app for it on Fedora

And it's on Qt, I suppose

And I don't have qt

Welcome!

Welcome²!

Paul Frields of the Fedora magazine?

Oh, he left :(

Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

?

??

Paul Frields of the Fedora magazine?

@stickster... Too bad he left. We didn't even have a chance to annoy him ?

O/

Wallpaper downloading app is 100kb but it has 260mb of deps. ?

Electron?

Electron?

Qt...There was no Qt on my computer because I have Fedora Xfce

Hey there, welcome! ?

Hi!

Kde plasma 5.8 is latest for fedora 27 now???

Kde plasma 5.8 is latest for fedora 27 now???

what?

what?

Kde plasma version

I mean, what's the question?

Sorry, where is LXQT spin i686?

F27?

Sorry, where is LXQT spin i686?

There isn't one

For i686 you need to go from alternative downloads and go to Everything image

or netinst

https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ws-download-splash?file=https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/27/Workstation/i386/iso/Fedora-Workstation-netinst-i386-27-1.6.iso

But is there lxqt netinst?

There isn't one

Thank you... Sadly... LXQT is the best distro for old PC

Yes, it is

I use everything iso to install LXQT in my old laptop

I can't find netinst too

https://alt.fedoraproject.org/

Thank you, I'll try Everything later

Thank you, I'll try Everything later

You should try it now. It provides a broad set of options to install any Fedora Flavor.

Thank you :) I don't know, why I pass it before...

Thank you... Sadly... LXQT is the best distro for old PC

I use Mate and XFCE in two low resources netbooks. Working good.

When I tried XFCE, it not was lighter than Gnome... LXDE or LXQT is much lighter...

But is there lxqt netinst?

Yes and no. With a net install you can choose any desktop you like. Only the very basic system is in the image, everything else is pulled from internet.

Yes and no. With a net install you can choose any desktop you like. Only the very basic system is in the image, everything else is pulled from internet.

Well, that's what I do with the Everything image

When I tried XFCE, it not was lighter than Gnome... LXDE or LXQT is much lighter...

Weird. I do find it very light.

Well, that's what I do with the Everything image

Yeah, but you also have options for different architectures.

For i686 you need to go from alternative downloads and go to Everything image

The i686 fedora everything have been deprecated, the kernel and tools won't get much more fixes

Unless a x86 legacy SIG can form the chances of even getting further package updates at all are slim.

The i686 fedora everything have been deprecated, the kernel and tools won't get much more fixes

Oops... Is any official note about this?

ERROR: S client not available

Oops... Is any official note about this?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels

Thank you :) I don't know, why I pass it before...

A lot of people, it’s not in a very obvious place. I should write an article about it.

https://fossbytes.com/fedora-27-linux-drop-32-bit-support/

I installed many LXDE on old PCs... Some users need it only for web-surf

Thank you. :(

The might has turned into "definitely" and you can only upgrade from 26 or use community made spins now - 686 will soon die entirely as i dont see the SIG growing afaik

I installed many LXDE on old PCs... Some users need it only for web-surf

I agree, they shouldn’t drop it. But you can use Debian Testing or Linux Lite. They support 32-bit.

But then again, 32bit is a minority to the point that supporting it is likely more work than dropping it and dealing with the loud but small minority.

But then again, 32bit is a minority to the point that supporting it is likely more work than dropping it and dealing with the loud but small minority.

They can do whatever they want. I’m using Debian Testing on two netbooks. Fedora didn’t work.

I installed many LXDE on old PCs... Some users need it only for web-surf

Take a look at chromium os then or cub linux.

But then again, 32bit is a minority to the point that supporting it is likely more work than dropping it and dealing with the loud but small minority.

I agree. I think that old computers can run under the old Fedora.

Note that even chromium and firefox are supporting i686 less and less and with chromium first they might stop supporting 32 bit too.

I'd rather not update anything there at all :)

If you have the ability to, replace 32 bit machines as soon as you can or stay stuck on debian until you can

I'd rather not update anything there at all :)

You always want your browser to be on latest.

Not doing it is a massive security risk.

No, I planned to use there F26, until hardware become die

No, I planned to use there F26, until hardware become die

That is not a good idea either

It will stop receiving updates when 28 comes out

Including browser updates.

Leaving you vulnerable forever.

This is surf-only PC, no serious...

No porno, no viruses :)

This is surf-only PC, no serious...

Escpecially a pc intended to be used for surfing the web.

Even with ublock origin

But without browser support... I can't support it and provide security patches...

BTW, where is dwb in Fedora now?

I lost it some in F26-F27 upgrade

https://fossbytes.com/fedora-27-linux-drop-32-bit-support/

This is not true. Also FESCo give the chance to the x86 SIG to work

We need more testing, hopefully we will have at least 1 more release of Fedora with 32-bits support

It's so sad to see how people just want to dismiss an architecture "because it's old"