You'd be excellent at this, as someone who currently doesn't have much time for community this channel and your magazine posts really help stay in the loop

Glad to help in any way I can. :)

for a very long time, Red Hat hated CentOS

The sales team still would

The sales team still would

haha.. u r probably right.

Hello all people and bots! What are repositories recommend for "Fedora 24"? --- I don't speak much English. Sorry if my expressions aren't so correct.

Other than defaults rpmfusion is only one for media..are you looking for any other packages?

For chrome browser th there is one..

I wonder especially since I see that some packages like "Blender" not their latest versions are updated.

These repositories "rpm fusion" are reliable?

Yes. They are using same build server. I use it only for media packages..for blender can you try search in gnome-software?

I check later, thanks! :)

there are the Russian Fedora repos as well, useful if you want Opera, the PPAPI flash (and freshplayerplugin), Oracle Java and other things that RPMFusion will never package

Sure.. All the best ?

$ sudo dnf copr enable ignatenkobrain/cutegram $ sudo dnf install cutegram

We finally packaged it!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401

We finally packaged it!

beautiful!

http://goo.gl/WC2NRu

Yes, they seem to have never heardc of forward and backward compatibiliity

Is there a fix for the font rendering ?

Is there a fix for the font rendering ?

what do you mean?

what do you mean?

The fonts look a bit odd, not sure if telegrams is compressing your screenshot.

yes, it's really strange

./awesome/fontawesome-webfont.ttf

oh, I guess that's why

why they can't just take system fonts....

ahh

fine here

fine here

I've seen these problems only in Flatpak apps, f24 has much better fonts now

Try Fedy. It provides a better font rendering tool.

Yep I thik it uses freetype-freeworld which I installed from rpmfusion

This is proprietary official Telegram client, not Cutegram.

It's not proprietary, though

It's not proprietary, though

Yep, but it cannot be built from sources because of patched versions of WebKit and Qt.

Yep I thik it uses freetype-freeworld which I installed from rpmfusion

freetype-freeworld makes me cry

It's not proprietary, though

it smells proprietary

You mean it's structured with a proprietary software mentality, but this still doesn't make it proprietary

You mean it's structured with a proprietary software mentality, but this still doesn't make it proprietary

it's almost same as Ubuntu's CLA

it's also kind of proprietary

it's almost same as Ubuntu's CLA

GPLv3? https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop/blob/master/LICENSE

GPLv3? https://github.com/telegramdesktop/tdesktop/blob/master/LICENSE

Try to build it without Qt and WebKit patches.

it doesn't mean anything. Read more about Canonical CLA: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25376.html I'm not telling that official tg-desktop is under some CLA, but you can not just take it and build, because it simply will not work

/me --> sleep

Try to build it without Qt and WebKit patches.

What you're saying is that being open-source itself and needing a patched open-source library makes it proprietary

it doesn't mean anything. Read more about Canonical CLA: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25376.html I'm not telling that official tg-desktop is under some CLA, but you can not just take it and build, because it simply will not work

I don't think they're doing the same thing as Canonical

What you're saying is that being open-source itself and needing a patched open-source library makes it proprietary

No, but open source version can be built only with patched versions of Qt and WebKit, so it will be never available from main Fedora's repository.

I see, but that's a completely different matter

Can't they get the upstream projects to merge their patches?

Can't they get the upstream projects to merge their patches?

No. Their patches are dirty hacks.

Only Qt needs a patch on Linux, as per build instructions

I can't assess if they're dirty hacks or not, I'm curious as to why you deem them as such

hi

Good evening!

I want to install Gnome. Do I need install dnf -y group install "Fedora Workstation" or is it wrong?

Yes, you need

Only is it?

Yes, that's all you need

I want to install Gnome. Do I need install dnf -y group install "Fedora Workstation" or is it wrong?

Or you could just use @gnome-desktop instead

Hummm

Ok, I going to try.

I installed, and my shell buged. :)

Update your GTK+ theme

hum...

ERROR: S client not available

ok

Update your GTK+ theme

Thnaks, resolved.

Hello all!, I have a bug in nautilus

every time I press " other locations " that happens

all folders are a large blank up

Hello all!, I have a bug in nautilus

Same here.

Create a new user, log in as that user and report back

Create a new user, log in as that user and report back

Thank but I have already done, and I have also removed and reinstalled nautilus and the problem persists.

Hello all!, I have a bug in nautilus

> not using thunar

To be fair, the default Fedora install does come with Nautilus and you can't expect everybody to know how to install a different file manager.

Though I agree that Nautilus is (currently) a piece of crap, I'd rather concentrate on improving it than blaming the user for using something that comes with Fedora by default.

Thank but I have already done, and I have also removed and reinstalled nautilus and the problem persists.

Google for "Nautilus 3.20 findrpm f24" and try reinstalling the older version of nautilus or you can recompile it using nautilus source code

Google for "Nautilus 3.20 findrpm f24" and try reinstalling the older version of nautilus or you can recompile it using nautilus source code

Thanks again, just I am trying to do this now...

> not using thunar

is that I like nautilus integrations :) but thanks anyway!

To be fair, the default Fedora install does come with Nautilus and you can't expect everybody to know how to install a different file manager.

but Nautilus is perfectly fine?

but Nautilus is perfectly fine?

1. Open Nautilus 2. Use ←↑↓→ to select a folder 3. Press Enter 4. Press Backspace to go one up 5. Nothing happens

but Nautilus is perfectly fine?

1. Open Nautilus 2. Start typing "Ima" expecting the folder "Images" to be selected (as with every other file manager) 3. Nautilus initiates a recursive search!

1. Open Nautilus 2. Use ←↑↓→ to select a folder 3. Press Enter 4. Press Backspace to go one up 5. Nothing happens

Why would i backspace to folder up

1. Open Nautilus 2. Start typing "Ima" expecting the folder "Images" to be selected (as with every other file manager) 3. Nautilus initiates a recursive search!

yes?

but Nautilus is perfectly fine?

Also, the bug reported by @Gsheep which started this whole conversation.

Why would i backspace to folder up

Because you'd like to keep your hands on the keyboard instead of having to use the mouse to go one up. Thunar, Konqueror, Caja and others are able to do this, why not Nautilus?

Because you'd like to keep your hands on the keyboard instead of having to use the mouse to go one up. Thunar, Konqueror, Caja and others are able to do this, why not Nautilus?

You can very likely set the key combination yourself- and user that dont know what that is very likely have no idea that you can even use your keyboard to navigate

well, Alt+Narrow Up

Alt+Narrow Left

You can very likely set the key combination yourself- and user that dont know what that is very likely have no idea that you can even use your keyboard to navigate

Even Windows' Explorer can do this.

well, Alt+Narrow Up

Why change the default that everybody was used to for so long? The default that is used in Windows, Xfce, Unity, MATE, Cinnamon and KDE?

yes?

It is very annoying. Everybody is used to that a folder should be highlighted, not a search started. If I wanted to search I'd do Ctrl+F. Windows', Xfce's, Unity's, MATE's, Cinnamon's and KDE's file managers are highlighting the folder. Only Nautilus is breaking the workflow everybody is used to.