I found SE Troubleshoot very useful. It shows you any action that SE took in place and provide you an instructions with associated command line to solve the any false alarm

its a power management standard fyi

its not a windows thing, although they were the ones to first implement it

its not a windows thing, although they were the ones to first implement it

Thanks for clarifying

I couldn’t. There’s no i386 version. I can’t install it on my Debian.

rpmfusion and negativo17 have rpms for spotify i guess

by the way, is your hardware old enough to not run x86_64?

Yes, but Debian is DEB package

My netbook yes

there are repos for that

https://www.spotify.com/us/download/linux/

Oh, thanks

?

Someone here uses librecad?

there are repos for that

I can’t install. Spotify client depends on a package that isn’t available in Debian Testing. ?

and it ends up in the fedora chat ? flatpak would work for you? i install via flatpak on fedora works awesome . check the page for installing flatpacks under debin

debian

the flathub one works great for me https://flathub.org/apps.html

Yes, worked fine for me.

rip 32 bit only ubuntu

and it ends up in the fedora chat ? flatpak would work for you? i install via flatpak on fedora works awesome . check the page for installing flatpacks under debin

No, because I’m trying to install it on my old netbook that is i386 Architektur.

Your best bet might be using gnome web in app mode

even old crappy netbooks had x86_64

No, because I’m trying to install it on my old netbook that is i386 Architektur.

pretty curious, what is the system spec ?

pretty curious, what is the system spec ?

1GB RAM, Atom Prozessor N450 1,66GHz storage 250GB HDD

Jesus

hoowee that's gonna be slow

1G RAM is not enough for my phone?‍♂

1G RAM is not enough for my phone?‍♂

Well, Debian works nicely there.

https://www.spotify.com/us/download/linux/

Or just use web Spotify

I couldn’t. There’s no i386 version. I can’t install it on my Debian.

Fedora 27 will drop i686 support completely.

Or just use web Spotify

doesn't it require flash? It did some time ago

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels

The i686 kernel is of limited use as most x86 hardware supports 64bit these days. It has been in a status of "community supported" for several Fedora releases now. As such, it gets very little testing, and issues frequently appear upstream. These tend to go unnoticed for long periods of time. When issues are found, it is often a long time before they are fixed because they are considered low priority by most developers upstream. This can leave other architectures waiting for important updates, and provides a less than desirable experience for people choosing to run a 32bit kernel. With this proposal, the i686 kernel will no longer be built. A kernel headers package will still exist, and all 32bit packages should continue to build as normal. The main difference is there would no longer be bootable 32bit images.

Fedora 27 will drop i686 support completely.

And? I’m using Debian there.

doesn't it require flash? It did some time ago

It doesn’t as far as I can tell.

Or just use web Spotify

I don’t like it much but well.

How to save config file?

in vim: <ESC> :wq <ENTER> to save and quit; use nano if you want a more approachable editor

http://howdoiquitvim.com/

in vim: <ESC> :wq <ENTER> to save and quit; use nano if you want a more approachable editor

nano--

Vim++

nano--

I use vim instead of nano all the time, yet for the beginners - let's be honest :P

it's because root owns this file

I think this is pretty self explanatory - you can't write to this file ;) I would guess you tried to edit it as a regular user

use sudo to get root priviledges

Okay I got it

Thanks

or try this: :w !sudo tee %

try sudoedit

if you modified a lot, you can save in other directory and cat the file over the original with the rigth pirvilegies

like: :w /tmp/filename.conf

then: sudo cat /tmp/filename.conf /etc/bla/bla.conf

then: sudo cat /tmp/filename.conf /etc/bla/bla.conf

you mean sudo cat a.conf > b.conf ?

try sudoedit

Visudo

yep sorry

missed the >

anyways, seriously, I recommend learning vim, but if you don't want to do this right now, use nano instead

or even mcedit

let the guy use what she/she wants!

i recommend to use ed...

the standard editor

ERROR: S client not available

Or emacs

real power users use hex editors to directly modify a filesystem on the disk

Or gedit

real power users use hex editors to directly modify a filesystem on the disk

?

...yeah the text editor jokes are beaten to death ;)

real power users use hex editors to directly modify a filesystem on the disk

real power users flip bit on the cable while travel to get written in the disk

who do not have a cosmic ray at hand XD

like: :w /tmp/filename.conf

This worked

real power users use hex editors to directly modify a filesystem on the disk

Real power user write their own hex editor

btw, if you're even in need of a good hex editor I can't recommend okteta enough

Thanks a lot

okteta's great for file analysis, the only open source editor I've found which lets me define structures and analyse them in binary files easily

:w !sudo dd of=% > /dev/null

a little bit hardcore, but works too

tee works, too :D

:w !sudo dd of=% > /dev/null

lol)

Yes, worked fine for me.

Thanks everyone.

1GB RAM, Atom Prozessor N450 1,66GHz storage 250GB HDD

You might be better off with DSL or Android . Most applications are written for a better off system.

You might be better off with DSL or Android . Most applications are written for a better off system.

Why would I want that when Debian Testing works perfectly fine?

Why would I want that when Debian Testing works perfectly fine?

Whatever works best for you.

Whatever works best for you.

What is DSL by the way? I know Android and I don’t like it, but the other one...

It is all about the Desktop Environment. I have Fedora 26 with OpenBox running in an old X40.

good evening, guys! My i386 laptop runs Fedora26XFCE u.u

What is DSL by the way? I know Android and I don’t like it, but the other one...

Damn Small Linux - http://tinycorelinux.net/

What is DSL by the way? I know Android and I don’t like it, but the other one...

Android comes with application such as Spotify, terminal, cppdroid,... And designed for systems with limited resources.

And if you are using your laptop for consumption, android works better.

Android comes with application such as Spotify, terminal, cppdroid,... And designed for systems with limited resources.

Android is a lot of things, but it definitely is not lightweight. 1GB RAM would make it difficult to run more than one application at once, so for example listening to Spotify while browsing the internet would be the best you can do, unless you'd go to a resource-intensive website. And my Moto G had a pretty vanilla Android, so it wasn't any vendor specific overlay being resource hungry ;)

Android is a lot of things, but it definitely is not lightweight. 1GB RAM would make it difficult to run more than one application at once, so for example listening to Spotify while browsing the internet would be the best you can do, unless you'd go to a resource-intensive website. And my Moto G had a pretty vanilla Android, so it wasn't any vendor specific overlay being resource hungry ;)

Android x86 is pretty vanilla.

I miss Maemo on N900 .

my Moto G5S Plus usually uses 1.7GB of RAM on 3GB