look man, i have no problem with you or anything else, what sucks for my usecase sucks, i followed the handbook and the vm-bhyve and freebsd wiki properly, and the issues were despite that, that is why i called them unexpected, and time efficiency is a thing, needing to debug unexpected issues when someone wants an vm up and running instantly isn't very time efficient, now this doesn't speak about industrial or other usecases, i won't be surprised if bhyve works almost the same as proxmox, xen or just plain kvm and some other userspace program for those and your usecases , it's just is always funny to see people say bhyve is better without mentioning how
Wikipedia has an answer for you: "bhyve performs about the same as its competitors with lack of memory ballooning and accelerated graphics interface, but bhyve has a more modern codebase and uses fewer resources. In the case of FreeBSD the resource management is more efficient. FreeBSD is also known for its exemplary I/O speeds; running bhyve from FreeBSD has a lot of advantages for time-critical virtual appliances by reducing I/O time, especially on disk and network related loads. "
Jay
polyduekes
Neville
Sadra
Mahdi
Mike
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Abhi
Juraj