ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Carry data.
FAT32 or ExFAT for larger ones. That allows the disk to work in all OS
Krond
NTFS also might work, drivers with write support is pretty stable.
Krond
But with current spread of wireless and cellular I see no reason to sync via USB.
Anonymous
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Hey
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
What happened?
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Hello everyone. You know that in this group we joke a lot about stuff like systemd free and open is better than closed source blah blah blah and such. Rant about what you like or not in this group is something that happens and its allowed while stays on topic. However, I've been recently notified that there is some kind of aggressive behaviour in external groups from users present in this group/community. The FreeBSD community doesn't support any of those behaviors. What other people in other groups talk about or care about is their business. There is no need to spam them with messages, memes and/or stickers about "use open and free stuff, your things are bad/wrong". And there's even less reason or need to threat on keep doing it once they ask them to stop. First, is not correct as a personal behaviour, that's up to each one but you are acting as a messenger of our community, with the wrong message. Second, it makes our community look bad, disrespectful and immature. And we don't want that in here. So I'm asking this once. To the user(s) that know they have done it, please, stop doing it. Respect the rest of communities, they aren't selling their ideas inside here, neither telling us to use their stuff. Don't be a jerk. If for some reason (I hope not) I'm informed again of this behavior, the user(s) are going to be banned from here. If someone wants to contact me via pm and explain me what has this happened, I'm all ears.
Anonymous
Hey guys is it normal that freecolor utility shows that freebsd uses almost 350 MB ? (With dwm and no program is open except xterm) top utility : 67M active 266M wired
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Hey guys is it normal that freecolor utility shows that freebsd uses almost 350 MB ? (With dwm and no program is open except xterm) top utility : 67M active 266M wired
Unused memory is useless memory. On a used system almost all memory will be constantly in use. Most of this however is taken up by various caches (process, file, etc). These caches will automatically get removed if there's an application with more pressing memory requirements. Wired memory however is locked and cannot be swapped out. This wired memory is used by the kernel, kernel modules and the kernel heap.
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Anonymous
You mean why it's not allocated under "free" label automatically?
Arch Linux Mem : 50 (Used) 1850 (Free) FreeBSD : Mem : 350 (Used) 1550 (Free) So the free memory in Arch Linux is not a real amount ??
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Arch Linux Mem : 50 (Used) 1850 (Free) FreeBSD : Mem : 350 (Used) 1550 (Free) So the free memory in Arch Linux is not a real amount ??
I have no clue on how Arch or Linux manages memory. But from the 350 used memory you said that: 67m active 266m wired. I guess Arch adds the wired memory as non used? Or maybe not. I don't know at all, but active memory seems about the same
Phil
Arch Linux Mem : 50 (Used) 1850 (Free) FreeBSD : Mem : 350 (Used) 1550 (Free) So the free memory in Arch Linux is not a real amount ??
I'm just surprised could you publish the benchmark for OpenBSD if you have it, it's interested
Phil
Maybe it's due to shmget() where you allocate a full page so 4kB (depends on the size of page) and maybe it's the recommended type of communication for ipc ?
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Hello and welcome nya~
Kaan deyil🤨🤨🤨
Hi
Anonymous
@n0madcoder does freebsd have anything to unlock LUKS formatted drives? ( like cryptsetup )
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
@n0madcoder does freebsd have anything to unlock LUKS formatted drives? ( like cryptsetup )
You can try with libluksde, but I've never worked with LUKS drives $ doas pkg install libluksde
Anonymous
I'm just surprised could you publish the benchmark for OpenBSD if you have it, it's interested
I have never tested OpenBSD on my hardware. I only installed OpenBSD , 2 times on Qemu/KVM
Phil
WTF is this ????? $ sed 's/^\d\.\ /## /g' /tmp/ufs sed: 1: "s/^\d\.\ /## /g": RE error: trailing backslash (\) the new regex ?! in the man 1 sed they are talking about the new regex ... What the hell is that ??
Phil
DESCRIPTION Regular expressions ("REs"), as defined in IEEE Std 1003.2 ("POSIX.2"), come in two forms: modern REs (roughly those of egrep(1); 1003.2 calls these "extended" REs) and obsolete REs (roughly those of ed(1); 1003.2 "basic" REs). Obsolete REs mostly exist for backward compatibility in some old prog man re_format
Phil
I even don't know what I am supposed to do ? cause this is working (directly from the man sed) : echo "/home/example" | sed 's/\/home\/example/\/usr\/local\/example/'
Phil
but what is even the point to have the new regex (I'm sure the reason is for a small useless features)
Phil
under the 12.1 I havent any issue with sed and plus I have oksh which doesn't have lacks of formating if you compare it to tcsh
Phil
thanks to relax me with this pic
Phil
I can't even read freely the standart IEEE 1003.2 you must buy it to read it ???
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
I can't even read freely the standart IEEE 1003.2 you must buy it to read it ???
oof. All can I access are draft versions of the document ):
Phil
I'm sorry but I think that is the stupidest decision that BSD take, this is not compatible to the ancient version that everyone knows and that many scripts use.
Anonymous
oof. All can I access are draft versions of the document ):
Which pdf viewer do you use ? I have to download 200 M packages for okular 😳
Phil
the fuck this is working : sed s/^[[:digit:]]\./##\ /g /tmp/ufs
Phil
but this is not : sed s/^[[:digit:]]\./##\ /g /tmp/ufs | sed s/^\#\#[:blank:][:digit]\./###/g
Phil
Finally get it : sed s/^[[:digit:]]\./##/g /tmp/ufs | sed s/^\#\#[[:digit:]]./###/g So the ERE is maybe more human readable but it completly breaks with the BRE and I think it's really sad, it reminds me linux where finally you must compile it with gcc due to extends macros
Phil
No I checked on the man https://man.openbsd.org/sed#SED_REGULAR_EXPRESSIONS by default BRE
Phil
(no default BRE)
Phil
but it support ERE
Anonymous
Bug ??
Anonymous
So what is the problem ? 😢
Anonymous
I had mounted ext2 before
Anonymous
Bug ??
try fuse or msdos ??
Anonymous
try fuse or msdos ??
msdos --> invalid argument fuse --> not supported by device I have mounted this usb a few hours ago , but now i can't mount it
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
I had mounted ext2 before
You need fusefs and e2fsprogs packages
Anonymous
is it still mounted ? .... remove it , the plug back
Anonymous
n
Anonymous
Anonymous
exfat ?
Алик Сережевич
Anonymous
camcontrol eject /dev/ada1
dude I'm now having the same problem ... WTF ?? in debian its all OK
Pouria
msdosfs is true.
Pouria
camcontrol eject /dev/ada1
If you want to eject an USB device, run: $ doas usbconfig and find the unit and addr of the USB device. and run: $ doas usbconfig -d 4.3 power_off For example, 4 is unit; And 3 is addr. You can read the usbconfig(8) manual page for more information.
Pouria
When you use camcontrol the USB device does not eject. IDK why, Anyone know? @n0madcoder @solaris557 Andrey
Anonymous
Bug ??
What is your usbs filesystem?
Anonymous
@n0madcoder does sendmail have to be running all the time or can I turn it off? I don't send or receive any electronic mail
Hardcode
turn it off then.
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Should i roll back to quarterly ?? I already use latest