Download and cd to file, then pkg install (first letters+tab) seems better to me. While using wget, forget the cd command.

But grub will be more convenient

So what... I have poor Internet connection and fail to download the package quite often. wget && pkg is simple oneliner that will do its work.

Hello

Good evening

I want to know. How named in freebsd to force resolve ipv4 instead ipv6

?

Does it possible ?

Would you like to give me some links to read ?

Thank you. Going to check it out

I live in a rental house. I cannot mount own/ISP's antenna, it is not allowed here. And mobile broadband is limited with low FUP and high price. wget -c -t0 works fine overnight 😁

Was there a problem with fragmented UDP Packages recently in FreeBSD that I should be aware of?

"UDP packages"...

Read: "datagrams" :-)

If you are not talking about IPv6 that happened long ago.

Thx!!!

hi friends

i need some help with Munin + Nginx + FreeBSD 12

i always get a forbidden error on web browser

no error on nginx error.log

no error on nginx error.log

I'd start with nginx configuration. Then, permissions of the web root directory.

I'd start with nginx configuration. Then, permissions of the web root directory.

thanks the problem was with incorrect fastcgi wrapper, everything it’s ok now

many beasty avatar are beauty friend, anyway i will save this!

i was thinking on Beasty fucking Tux avatars, i saw the img on www ...

hahahahha

@Corben999 we love FreeBSD that’s why we are here hehehehe, nice tu meet you bro …

hello good morning, i have installed freebsd 8.2-STABLE with openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8n 24 Mar 2010. now i need to upgrade to openssl version 1.0.x, because i need openssl to support TLS support 1.2, i read that not save to upgrade openssl version to 1.0.x on freebsd 8.2 because so many package depending to it version. could you guys give me sugestion or link to upgrade openssl version without update operating system ?

First of all it's easier to update the system. And you don't lose much due to nice kernel compatibility.

If you can't afford that - you can install openssl from ports and build everything with it locally.

First of all it's easier to update the system. And you don't lose much due to nice kernel compatibility.

This is live server. I can't do this. It may causing losing data. And I don't want it

If you can't afford that - you can install openssl from ports and build everything with it locally.

Is is oke. If I replace the old one with the newer or latest one?

I'm updating live servers. The process is fairly straightforward, yet for the first time it's better to experiment on VM somewhere, there are some shallow rocks like init scripts moving and configuration changes that can make OS fail to boot. Otherwise you can build next version from source and update kernel, reboot, then on the new kernel install new world and go update packages. Remember to reboot one more time after the process.

You can't replace old openssl from the world with the one in ports.

You can't take out openssl from the world, lots of stuff in world depend on it (crypto/hashsums). By removing old openssl you will break a lot.

Openssl from ports installs under /usr/local and you can build ports with it. Both openssl versions will continue to function.

Oke thanks buddy

👍👍👍👍

This is live server. I can't do this. It may causing losing data. And I don't want it

Live server on bare metal? These days? Make a virtual machine out of this one, bring it to life on another server and turn off the real one. Then, you can make sysupgrade/config/testing. Or, you may want to create virtual machine, upgrade/configure/test, and then deploy on the bare metal you run. One reboot=2 minutes outage. Or, you can create a nice 'out of service' page and present using another server this one instead of original for some hours until you get things done. These are ways to do it. No matter the aging hardware.

Hi I would like to know is anything on bsd related to abcs or like selinux which could be used ?

SELinux? You're in hell, there is nothing like that. Just daemons all around. What do you need, in fact?

13.9. Access Control Lists https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/fs-acl.html

Hi I would like to know is anything on bsd related to abcs or like selinux which could be used ?

Is it what you came for?

I think there are a lot different policies and modules that do different things. I'm personally a fan of mac_portacl.

SELinux? You're in hell, there is nothing like that. Just daemons all around. What do you need, in fact?

Yes i see but is there anything like on BSD which is Attribute-based access control model ?

13.9. Access Control Lists https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/fs-acl.html

I think there are a lot different policies and modules that do different things. I'm personally a fan of mac_portacl.

Good but this is for ports as I read

I think there are a lot different policies and modules that do different things. I'm personally a fan of mac_portacl.

i m unable to find it....mac_portacl...which port is it...

i m unable to find it....mac_portacl...which port is it...

https://docs.freebsd.org/doc/7.3-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/handbook/mac-portacl.html

https://docs.freebsd.org/doc/7.3-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/handbook/mac-portacl.html

thanks.....

thanks.....

Hi

Is there a way to only have 1 vlan network device up? My problem is, i am connected to a trunk, have created a vlan, and manually confugured my vlan device to inet ip adress, but the physical interface is up and gets a dhcp from native vlan, i dont know how to disable it.

The point is, as a workaround i changed the physical device em0 from DHCP to 10.x.x.x address, and my default route to 172.18.x.x so thy system takes my vlan device as primary. But virtualbox takes the wrong device for natting

maybe you have ifconfig_<interface>="DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf?

Is there a way to disable em0 without disabling em0_50

Or is everything ok and i need to change something in virtualbox to choose the right network interface?

Hi guys, anyone here got flash player working?

ifconfig_em0="up" should be ok

Thank you i will try it

Hi guys, anyone here got flash player working?

It works on Linux

thanks, but i'm asking about freebsd

thanks, but i'm asking about freebsd

Did you install it manually?

thanks, but i'm asking about freebsd

all works install from ports

thanks, but i'm asking about freebsd

Under BSD, it works on Linux. You must install Linux ABI support from ports as well and enable it. Open the handbook. It is all described there.

Thanks, will check

Is flash still a thing? I was thinking its dead

Thanks, will check

I have checked as well. Because Mozilla dropped NPAPI support, it is no longer possible to use linux-flashplugin port with Firefox. One choice is Opera, the other Chromium with (not sure of support and proper name) pepperflash plugin.

Is flash still a thing? I was thinking its dead

Yes, neither I see the point why to install it..😉

Yes, neither I see the point why to install it..😉

Many sites still work with it, it's helpful playing atari arcade videogames online, 😂😂😂😂

Many sites still work with it, it's helpful playing atari arcade videogames online, 😂😂😂😂

Even last year, many sites worked with http and only support for ipv4, upgrading some times is a big mess.

I have checked as well. Because Mozilla dropped NPAPI support, it is no longer possible to use linux-flashplugin port with Firefox. One choice is Opera, the other Chromium with (not sure of support and proper name) pepperflash plugin.

yes, I've tried it with Firefox and Chromium and neither worked

but chromium was installed through pkg, not ports

Chromium uses PPAPI which is quite difference. There is no way to use linux-flashplugin with FF and Chrome/Chromium, you would need some kind of wrapper like the nspluginwrapper was. But it hasn't been written yet, AFAIK. Use pepperflash instead, recently, it might work with Firefox though it was written for Chrome.

but chromium was installed through pkg, not ports

Try to install it manually, download it, untar it, there's a read text file, do it that way, but firstable uninstall it, then open Firefox and plugins, it must be there.

yes, I've tried it with Firefox and Chromium and neither worked

Which one? Pepperflash or linux-flashplugin?

but chromium was installed through pkg, not ports

As far as I remember, there was no difference, pkg or ports. At least for browsers. Yes, they have their compiled time options, but they are not related to plug-ins. .. I may be wrong, anyway.

You might as well install Linux ABI layer and run linux version of Chrome..