Anonymous
Just dont send me a random aes.cpp
can i send you random code
Anonymous
some other stuff
Now that's bad
Ariana
can i send you random code
I’m going to assume you want it pwned or something then and spend like 5 years trying
Anonymous
how?
C++ is my favorite language.. don't say it bad
Ariana
Any input?
Ariana
Ariana
c++ isn’t bad
Ariana
Its !bad
Anonymous
Any input?
when i finish it i will let you know
Anonymous
I’m going to assume you want it pwned or something then and spend like 5 years trying
Please send me msg in dm . I'm unable to send u bcoz I'm reported..😔😔😔
Anonymous
c++ isn’t bad
it is poor for designing algorithms
Anonymous
it is poor for prototyping
Ariana
Dima
Go for c#
Dima
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
use lisp
Dima
Oh yeah sure nice choice
Dima
Anonymous
i do on paper :>
paper is expensive
Ariana
I literally design my code in C how much more crippled can it get XD
BinaryByter
One is endian aware, the other not? The first is not valid in c++
>he first is not valid in c++ hah! toldya, @GeneralSoros
Anonymous
it is C
Anonymous
not C++
BinaryByter
who said that?
Anonymous
Anonymous
who said that?
he said it is for embedded
Anonymous
secondly
Dima
neckbeard lol gg
BinaryByter
BinaryByter
because thats what you imply when assuming that embedded is C
BinaryByter
Anonymous
Anonymous
it is valid in C++
olli
he said it is for embedded
There is embedded c++ as well?!
Anonymous
just added (uint8_t*) into it
BinaryByter
it is valid in C++
compiling != valid without UB
Anonymous
There is embedded c++ as well?!
yes but it is still rarely used for a GOOD REASON
Anonymous
it is valid
BinaryByter
stil doesnt make it not be UB
Anonymous
there is nothing invalid about it
Anonymous
ok which particular compiler has this as UB
Anonymous
please show me
BinaryByter
i showed you the cppreference page
Anonymous
Anonymous
here
olli
It is valid c, yes, because c allows type pruning
Anonymous
i showed you the cppreference page
and it was fine with what was said there
Anonymous
was not
yes it was because the union was still inside the liftime of the union
Anonymous
he is not redefining structs or unions they are all being definend in the local scope
Anonymous
and uses all in the local scope
Anonymous
this is a scoping issue and is completely allowed
Anonymous
endianness, yes)
also just so you know you can change the endianness on the xtensa inside the ESP?
BinaryByter
absolutely subjective
notice the "sometimes"
olli
This is ub
Anonymous
in asm/C
Anonymous
This is ub
show me which compiler
Anonymous
show me 1 compiler this does not work on
Avamander
notice the "sometimes"
That sometimes is subjective.
Anonymous
because this is all inside a local scope
olli
show me which compiler
That always the excuse, "but all my compilers do what I expect"...
olli
The language defines it as malformed
Anonymous
no it does not
Anonymous
it is within the local scope
olli
it is within the local scope
It violates strict aliasing rules?
Anonymous
if it is within the local scope it is fine