You lack experience

Not an excuse

No,for real. Comments lie

How

int pointx; //y-coordinate

The variables were swapped

Comment that

Someone didn't update the comments

Well That is Mr. Someone's mistake Not the comments

Comments are made to help you

Yeah And since you are refactoring someone's code You have the responsibility of considering to change the comments

So you have to do double the work

Yup Maybe your refactoring process is very bad

How about i just let you get experience before we continue talking?

commented out code is a good code ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

I don't comprehend arr+2🤔

I don't comprehend arr+2🤔

commented out code is a good code ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Can we do this *(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)

Can we do this *(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)

Lol

/warn shady exe i'm a bad admin, i'm so sorryyy

default desktop

noticed in windows server 2012 (lol don’t ask me why and how) and in macos

Yo Archi

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

You're not

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

An old covenant among humans state that one cannot code in C++, make music and use Lenny face. One has to choose 2

An old covenant among humans state that one cannot code in C++, make music and use Lenny face. One has to choose 2

Yea

psst I have a large collection of lenny ascii faces

what is that :(){... you have in ur username?

oh i thought that it was a command for speed up my pc

int main() { int x,y=2,z,a; if ( x = y%2) z =2; a=2; printf("%d %d ",z,x); return 0; }

Position of arr plus 2. Should be out of bounds

I am from india. Which laptop is best for programming

Exactly. That thing is strange

Ist iteration *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+cpl)+row)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 11, 11, 11, 11 Col increments to 1, *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 22, 22, 22, 22 Col increments Now col is not less than 2, It will increment row to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 Col increments to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 33,33,33,33 Therefore, 11,11,11,11 22,22,22,22 22,22,22,22 33,33,33,33 Is it the correct logic?

Out of bounds pointers are only a problem whet they are accessed