@programminginc - страница 654

Mat

Just tell us your logic

Anonymous

Just tell us your logic

Ist iteration *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+cpl)+row)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 11, 11, 11, 11 Col increments to 1, *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 22, 22, 22, 22 Col increments Now col is not less than 2, It will increment row to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 Col increments to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 33,33,33,33 Therefore, 11,11,11,11 22,22,22,22 22,22,22,22 33,33,33,33 Is it the correct logic?

Anonymous

@Occupato

Anonymous

??

BinaryByter

Ist iteration *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+cpl)+row)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 11, 11, 11, 11 Col increments to 1, *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 22, 22, 22, 22 Col increments Now col is not less than 2, It will increment row to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 Col increments to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 33,33,33,33 Therefore, 11,11,11,11 22,22,22,22 22,22,22,22 33,33,33,33 Is it the correct logic?

Not gonna read that lul

Anonymous

Not gonna read that lul

Then dont, someone with good c skills will do it, and may help me with logic

Anonymous

Ist iteration *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+cpl)+row)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+0)+0)=**p(0)=11 11, 11, 11, 11 Col increments to 1, *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 22, 22, 22, 22 Col increments Now col is not less than 2, It will increment row to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+0)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+row)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 *(*(p+col)+1)=*(*(p+0)+1)=**p(1)=22 Col increments to 1 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+row)+col)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 *(*(p+col)+row)=*(*(p+1)+1)=**p(2)=33 33,33,33,33 Therefore, 11,11,11,11 22,22,22,22 22,22,22,22 33,33,33,33 Is it the correct logic?

My brain is fekked up now

BinaryByter

Then dont, someone with good c skills will do it, and may help me with logic

'with good c skills' Lol

BinaryByter

My brain is fekked up now

Wait until you get to see the context xD

Anonymous

'with good c skills' Lol

You just do the talking stuff? Right??

Anonymous

lol😂

Anonymous

Just tell us your logic

Check it man

BinaryByter

You just do the talking stuff? Right??

I'm sure that nobody will bother helping you. Your question features some horrible code and lacks context, besides there isnpt even a question to begin with

BinaryByter

If you are thaught such codes at university, i'm sorry for you

BinaryByter

If someone commited code like that to clinl I'd probably not accept the commit

Anonymous

Here's the real code

BinaryByter

What's the question?

Anonymous

Wanted to know logic behind the output! That's it!!

Anonymous

That printf function

BinaryByter

It increments the position in memory and uses that incremented position

BinaryByter

If its what you needed to know

BinaryByter

Tell your teachers to become good at coding

BinaryByter

Not even a C coder would code that badly

BinaryByter

@Neko_cpp is that right?

Anonymous

Someone's offended, calm down bro!! Easy✌️

Anonymous

Wanted to know logic behind the output! That's it!!

Didn't you write that yourself?

Anonymous

Yep, i did😅, actually @Occupato has answered all my doubts so far, and he asked for my logic, so i did

BinaryByter

Wat?

BinaryByter

Someone's offended, calm down bro!! Easy✌️

Bad code triggers me

Anonymous

And lame excuses does to me, code is a code.

klimi

i can

BinaryByter

And lame excuses does to me, code is a code.

There is readable code, bad code and this above

Anonymous

Oh

BinaryByter

Exactly

BinaryByter

The code you were given is so bad, i'd not even considerconsider answering that question in an exam

BinaryByter

Well okay maybe i would

BinaryByter

It is full of useless pointer arithmetic, useless (redundant) pointern

BinaryByter

Etc

BinaryByter

Besiden, it's C

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Daaamn C is very fucking complicated

BinaryByter

Daaamn C is very fucking complicated

No, it's just that the coders were drunk

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

No, it's just that the coders were drunk

Lol

BinaryByter

If you happen to commit such shit to clinl, i will happily kill you :)

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Oh

BinaryByter

Because, yes this is possible in cpp aswell

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

I was commetting such thing

BinaryByter

Huh?

BinaryByter

Reminder: comments in code are evil

BinaryByter

(exceptions to be made)

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Kidding

BinaryByter

Okay xDD

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Reminder: comments in code are evil

I saw a comment in your code

BinaryByter

But still, keep that in mind

BinaryByter

I saw a comment in your code

Either it was a bad comment, or a todo comment, or a nesnecary comment

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

I saw a comment in your code

//Array out of bounds

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

//Array out of bounds

When you were returning a NULL to reference

BinaryByter

That one is nessecary because making an empty function that handles outofbound would be overkill

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

I know one day you'll give up from that logic

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

I know one day you'll give up from that logic

Comments says alot about the design

Anonymous

Ok

Anonymous

Lol,i passed the test😁, so I guess am human

BinaryByter

Though you might refactor the if statement's predicate to be if (indexIsOutOfBounds(index))

BinaryByter

Create that private function for me please and refactor that function

BinaryByter

Or actually

BinaryByter

No don't

BinaryByter

Since it's an else statement

BinaryByter

I will refactor it myself

BinaryByter

Comments says alot about the design

No

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Lol,i passed the test😁, so I guess am human

You must sacrifice your blood to prove us that you are a real human being That's how you are gonna join C++inati secret group

BinaryByter

I know one day you'll give up from that logic

Very unlikely

BinaryByter

No

Comments lie

BinaryByter

Comments lie

Comments like to move around in a file

Anonymous

You must sacrifice your blood to prove us that you are a real human being That's how you are gonna join C++inati secret group

😄Okay then

BinaryByter

Comments disturb the reading flow

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Comments lie

No

BinaryByter

Comments make you too lazy to code well

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Comments for others

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

Not for you

BinaryByter

No

You lack experience

MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ

And it can be little for learning purposes