raytracing problem in a gpu each 'pixel' makes his own ray, and calculation is done in parralel, so it is easy to write what each pixel see, but takes about million times more time if you want to integrate rays on a surface that is hit by a ray. i dont actually need to integrate the hita, and what source sees is enough for me. i just wanted to make sure that this is a real problem and it is actually hard to solve it. is it?

most GPU's can't raytrace natively

it seems like this is a fundamental problem, not just lack of a function for it. i mean integrating over a million parralel cores\workers should br hard anyway, right?

its a fundamental problem that is avoided by using another system that is way faster

i dont need graphics. i need to calculate light intensity in a lamp, so i must use this way

not bad for a 8bit microcontroller lol

text processing isn't hard, even for a microcontroller

ah really?

i really underestimated it haha. just assumed it was going to break

the problem arises, when you do a lot of this

yea you can tell i'm dumb 😆

my NN makes too many of them

But a neural net isn't a person

But a neural net isn't a person

how do know what he's making?

for all we know he could be interfacing directly with a human brain.. we have no idea

Off-topic question, Can we send files to other telegram users directly from Google Drive or any other cloud storage?

Generating one code is quick. Generating 1000000 codes should be a huge problem for it

made own nn-based friend

I am talking about related stuff above

I had plans for that

Do it lmao, make us proud, Dima

You're both crazy