Don’t just try to click everything in one file 😅

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Configure-Terms.html

Thank you it does give some clarity curious how did I miss

But I am still afraid that it won’t work, will reply in 30 min

I want that when loop run second time it check '1'

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Configure-Terms.html

So yes the —host=arm-linux-gnueabihf —target=arm-linux-gnueabihf And now the interesting part I was using -build=arm-linux-gnueabihf As I thoughts it’s made inside docker container but the actual build machine is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

So yes the —host=arm-linux-gnueabihf —target=arm-linux-gnueabihf And now the interesting part I was using -build=arm-linux-gnueabihf As I thoughts it’s made inside docker container but the actual build machine is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Which is what I asked you. Is it working now?

Which is what I asked you. Is it working now?

When was —build=arm-linux-gnueabihf with above setting it was not, but I am right now waiting for it to attempt to build using setting —build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

When was —build=arm-linux-gnueabihf with above setting it was not, but I am right now waiting for it to attempt to build using setting —build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Great. Do post the result please

Great. Do post the result please

Thank you I will do, it will take at least an hour to get

Great. Do post the result please

I think it worked but failed during compilation process 😅🥲

Great. Do post the result please

-I/root/gcc-11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++  -O2 -g /root/gcc-11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h -o arm-linux-gnueabihf/bits/stdc++.h.gch/O2g.gch In file included from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/move.h:57,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/nested_exception.h:40,                  from /root/gcc-11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/exception:148,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/ios:39,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/istream:38,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/sstream:38,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/complex:45,                  from /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/ccomplex:39,                  from /root/gcc-11.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h:54: /root/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:971:25: error: there are no arguments to ‘__is_nothrow_constructible’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘__is_nothrow_constructible’ must be available [-fpermissive]   971 |       = __bool_constant<__is_nothrow_constructible(_Tp, _Args...)>;

It doesn’t seem as a popular error... I did manage to install the gcc 11.2 manually in the compiler while running it in interactive mode without errors. So I build a container with required tools then run it and then installed gcc. Perhaps the only alternative is to install it every time manually and commit the changes to the container?

In the container*

Hello everyone! In VS 22 I found some issue with arrays. For example: if make array like int arr[4] = {1,2,3,4}; and after use element out of array like cout << int[10]; program show number like -82.... or 0 and I have no exceptions. Its new c++ feature or I must enable some exceptions type?

You are simply lucky that it doesn’t crash

I want that it will crash on this line

Where I must enable it? I can't found solving

Hello everyone! In VS 22 I found some issue with arrays. For example: if make array like int arr[4] = {1,2,3,4}; and after use element out of array like cout << int[10]; program show number like -82.... or 0 and I have no exceptions. Its new c++ feature or I must enable some exceptions type?

Are you doing int[10] or arr[10]

You did have written int[10], which should throw error, But if it's arr[10] then it won't

Are you doing int[10] or arr[10]

I wrote arr[10]

You did have written int[10], which should throw error, But if it's arr[10] then it won't

I don't mean syntax error

It's returning memory content, which is just dump number

if your array was assigned from mem location 0, arr[10] will return content at location 10, which is just random for this case

ok, thanks

how to get random dates in c program

Guys, I can't decide what to put inside no return no arg, with return with arg etc data structure

how to get random dates in c program

see man time.h

see man time.h

can you say more clear please 🥲😅

(void)argc; (void)argv; guys what is the point of doing this at the end of main?

I found it in an example usage of a library but I'm confused.

(void)argc; (void)argv; guys what is the point of doing this at the end of main?

Not returning everything ?

Not returning everything ?

returns 0, it's main

returns 0, it's main

Uhh, how to explain this one

(void)argc; (void)argv; guys what is the point of doing this at the end of main?

shutting up the compiler about unused variables

shutting up the compiler about unused variables

oh.

just not naming the variable does the same

I see, makes sense.

(void)argc; (void)argv; guys what is the point of doing this at the end of main?

It's done to avoid comiler warnings about unused arguments. Nowadays you can mark them with [[maybe_unused]] if they unused sometimes (e.g. depending on a macro definition). Or yes, as Ludovic said, the best way is just not give them a name (you can comment the name like /* argumentName */ if you don't want to loose it).

I see I see.

It's done to avoid comiler warnings about unused arguments. Nowadays you can mark them with [[maybe_unused]] if they unused sometimes (e.g. depending on a macro definition). Or yes, as Ludovic said, the best way is just not give them a name (you can comment the name like /* argumentName */ if you don't want to loose it).

I guess they're C++ only, because it doesn't work in my C code.

I guess they're C++ only, because it doesn't work in my C code.

yes [[maybe_unused]] is C++ specific, my bad

yes [[maybe_unused]] is C++ specific, my bad

no bad, it's just me writing C instead of C++ to this date the fact is that I'm not very comfortable with C++ I find it difficult to read

no bad, it's just me writing C instead of C++ to this date the fact is that I'm not very comfortable with C++ I find it difficult to read

I agree, C++ attributes are pretty ugly (well, a lot of the things are in C and C++)

actually I have a question for you I'm looking for a fast, real time maths library

I need it for float signal processing, DSP in particular

I'm looking for it in Conan Center but searching on it is a bit weird (I can't find libraries even if they are present in the repo)

I installed Visual Studio for C ++ but I'm programming in C language, did I do it right?

MSVC(Microsoft's compiler, part of Visual Studio) can compile C. So, yes. You did it right.

can you say more clear please 🥲😅

Are you using *nix? If yes, you can use time.h header in your C/C++ program. Typing man time.h gives you implementations of time.h.

Any idea about GSoC organizations that work on C/C++ ?

does any one know how to do the min_heap with priority_queue<pair<pair<int,int>,int>> ; ?

I'm writting dijkstra wth O(M*Nlogn) timecomplexty

I have no idea how cmp write (greater)

when dijsktra request the priority_queue it will send something like this : pair<pair<int,int> , int> the first (pair<int,int>) is where the point storage , the last (int) is the value of dijkstra ,

thanks , i solved it

auto cmp = [](pair<pair<int,int>,int> &left, pair<pair<int,int>,int> &right) { return left.second < right.second; }; priority_queue<pair<pair<int,int>,int>, vector<pair<pair<int,int>,int>>, decltype(cmp)> pq(cmp);

Hello, I am trying to learn how to cross compile (target: macos, compile in linux) with clang. and I try: `clang++ main.cpp -std=c++17 -target x86_64-apple-darwin --verbose -fuse-ld=lld --sysroot ~/macosfs/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -stdlib=libc++ clang version 13.0.1`, but it says: paste-bin.xyz 44817

lld says cannot found crt1.o, but when I try call lld manually without trying to link crt1.o, it works and create a runnable a.out.

OK, I know what happended, just add an environment variable such as "MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=12.0.0" to specify the currect sdk version

👍

Interesting task const char* pSomeVar = “Some var”; MyFunctionX( other Params ); How would MyFunction implementation look like to be able to capture pSomeVar ?

Any ideas ?

someone who knows how to work with burp suite?

Interesting task const char* pSomeVar = “Some var”; MyFunctionX( other Params ); How would MyFunction implementation look like to be able to capture pSomeVar ?

What problems with MyFunctionX(const char* pSomeVar); ?

someone who knows how to work with burp suite?

don't ask to ask, just ask

What problems with MyFunctionX(const char* pSomeVar); ?

No we can’t past it as a variable into function

I want someone to teach me how to use burp suite repeater and burp interset, I need to learn how to capture otp codes or security code... can someone help me with this? I don't mind paying..

No we can’t past it as a variable into function

why not? it's a pointer

No we can’t past it as a variable into function

Its work

Yes it’s a task to get rid of macros

I was thinking about possibility inheriting from lambda making a functor or something

But maybe there are better ideas ?

You haven't posted any macro

You need to provide the whole context so people can understand your problem

You pass const pointer to function, what problems

Okey if you need to fix it on 100000 places

Would you still try to pass it?

what fix?

Please provide the whole context. Passing pointer in C is pretty standard thing, I fail to grasp the problem you have with fixint it on 1[0]+ places

You don’t understand

#define TEST() std::cerr << pSomeVar ; int main() Static const char* pSomeVar = “...”; TEST()