https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/z6rzWcPP7z/

is there a way to use regex in kernel ?

should it be printf instead of print in the last for loops?

What do you mean?

is it possible to use regex in kernel space linux ?

regex is userspace .Idk in kernel ,it is implemented or not

Something like http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/V8regex?

Now I understand why Linus doesn't want C++ in kernel

why

I mean the discussion above If you give people ability to do something overcomplicated and/or not efficient, they will try to use this ability

I mean the discussion above If you give people ability to do something overcomplicated and/or not efficient, they will try to use this ability

So it's better to use languages that make everything more complicated. Ok.. We should program kernels in brainfuck. Got it.

C++ is over complicated, C is simple as knife

C++ is more complicated to compiler writers, C is more complex to users. Depends on your priorities

check user manual for C and C++, what book has more pages

Tutorial to brainfuck is shorter https://gist.github.com/roachhd/dce54bec8ba55fb17d3a So? Having lots of features doesn't mean you have to know all of them.

check user manual for C and C++, what book has more pages

what do you think about duration to learn C and C++? what duration is longer?

C++ is simpler to use. Python is much larger than C. Do you think its more complicated to use?

what about my question?

this is not about large. 1. I want to be C coder 2. I want to be c++ coder. what is more time-cosnuming: 1 or 2?

You can write most C programmes using C++ compiler. Same code you've learn for C is most likely valid C++. So being C programmer makes you C++ programmer too.

ok, no answer as usual. thank you

Tutorial to brainfuck is shorter https://gist.github.com/roachhd/dce54bec8ba55fb17d3a So? Having lots of features doesn't mean you have to know all of them.

brain fuck has more inbuilt functions than C++ ?

⁉ No... Why should it? The original statement was that shorter language standard makes language simpler to use. This is wrong.

Rewrite the following expression in C ++ Code and print it. a + b + c + d + e Algebra: C ++: = (a + b + c + d + e) ​​/ 5; If the parentheses are removed, we obtain a + b + c + d + e / 5, which evaluates incorrectly as: a + b + c + d +e/5

//m=A+B+C+D+E/5 #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main (){ int A, B, C , D , E , sum , m; cout <<"enter the A & B & C & D & E \n"; cin >>A>>B >>C>>D>>E ; sum = A + B + C + D + E ; m=sum/5; cout <<"_____________\n"; cout <<" m = "<< m;}

.

perhaps u should use float or double at least for m cmiiw

can you help me

just use double for your variable. aka change int to double n try again. iam still new on this field hehe. cmiiw

Thanks

C++ is more complicated to compiler writers, C is more complex to users. Depends on your priorities

C++ is more complicated to "the user" as well. Do you know all the ways to initialize and their order? How does template overload resolution work? What's the difference between decltype(a) and decltype((a)) ? What properties does an object need to have to be "TriviallyMemcopyable" ? The list could go on for a while, when writing C, you don't care about any of this

C++ is more complicated to "the user" as well. Do you know all the ways to initialize and their order? How does template overload resolution work? What's the difference between decltype(a) and decltype((a)) ? What properties does an object need to have to be "TriviallyMemcopyable" ? The list could go on for a while, when writing C, you don't care about any of this

I don't need it to write code. It's easier to start with C++ and become productive

To write program I still need collections, algorithms etc. I have this for free in C++. What do I have in C?

Usually you don't start but rather join a project. What if a project already uses them? Also you haven't talked about productivity but being complicated, that's not the same

To write program I still need collections, algorithms etc. I have this for free in C++. What do I have in C?

C++ is more complicated to compiler writers, C is more complex to users. Depends on your priorities

Which collection can you use in a kernel?

Which collection can you use in a kernel?

Which collection can you use in a kernel?

Do vtables work in kernjel?

You said > C++ is more complicated to compiler writers, C is more complex to users. Depends on your priorities And I'd argue c++ is more complex than c anytime

provide something on static programming

Everywhere were C++ is supported code is shorter and easier to write. You can't create generic algorithm, generic containers, smart pointers in C. You need to handle everything yourself and use unsafe casts and pointers. It's not readable and isn't easy to support

Again, I disagree. C++ can be harder to write - have you ever used meta programming? You should judge a language based on what it offers and not what you use. Also qsort is a generic algorithm. I'm not saying you'd be more productive in c or should use c, I'm just saying it's not not complicated. (Especially since a lot of c is valid c++ as well)

Please help me

ヅ Mahmut《《 Eng: //m=A+B+C+D+E/5 #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main (){ int A, B, C , D , E , sum , m; cout <<"enter the A & B & C & D & E \n"; cin >>A>>B >>C>>D>>E ; sum = A + B + C + D + E ; m=sum/5; cout <<"_____________\n"; cout <<" m = "<< m;} ......, Is that True or false 😐😐