off tobic must cause a deleting message not banning or even restricting
it is very easy job for admins to ban people
Not every ot is warn or ban
Artöm
Artöm
off tobic must cause a deleting message not banning or even restricting
it is very easy job for admins to ban people
Ot doesnt cause any restrict, warn is not one
Anonymous
Ot doesnt cause any restrict, warn is not one
after 2 warnings a person get banned from communicating with 8846
Anonymous
these is rough for the people who were banned for small matters
Anonymous
to you not to them
Artöm
I agree tho that warn amount should be lifted to 3
Anonymous
and them is more than u
Anonymous
I agree tho that warn amount should be lifted to 3
u still didn't understand the princible here
Artöm
u still didn't understand the princible here
People get warns according to rules. They have plenty of time to read them and not be stupid
Anonymous
People get warns according to rules. They have plenty of time to read them and not be stupid
i was talking about the ruless
Anonymous
the rules doesn't make any sense
Anonymous
go to offtop chat and reason your point
thx but i never saw something like these since i used telegram
Mr_X
Anyone tell me the logic for 1 1 2 2 4 2 6
Mr_X
For odd position num%2 ==0 then print num+2
For even position what logic can I use ?
Pavel
For odd position num%2 ==0 then print num+2
For even position what logic can I use ?
Too few numbers to guess the pattern, I think
Anonymous
Hii
Dima
Anonymous
For odd position num%2 ==0 then print num+2
For even position what logic can I use ?
If num%2 != 0 then num + 1
Anonymous
Maybe
Anonymous
What is this:
void foo() {
new std::vector<int>{};
}
Dima
lol
Denis
Pavel
So that's a memory leak
Anonymous
1 1 2 2 4 2 6 3 8 3 10 3 12
Well what you mentioned for even positions doesn't go with this one
Anonymous
There are two patterns
Anonymous
2 4 6 8 10 12,...
Anonymous
And 1 22 333
Ioann_
i don'k know why not
Ioann_
cause my publication is very usefull for C++ community
Ioann_
it's bad? Why?
Dima
he just got triggered to non-english I think
Pavel
Rules are rules for everyone
Anonymous
std::vector<int>{}; ?
initialises vector with what?
Dima
at least it is on-topic
I_Interface
std::vector<int>{}; ?
initialises vector with what?
just calling constructor with std::initializer_list
Anonymous
just calling constructor with std::initializer_list
Is there any reason to call constructor or wirte it like that?
klimi
if i rewrite my post by Eng, but with URL on russian IT resource is it ok?
If someone tells me I'm OK with it
Dima
👌
I_Interface
Is there any reason to call constructor or wirte it like that?
0 difference in this case
Pavel
Is there any reason to call constructor or wirte it like that?
It depends what you're trying to achieve, at the moment your code you've posted does nothing except for creating a leak
Anonymous
So,
new std::vector<int>;
works?
I_Interface
So,
new std::vector<int>;
works?
auto vec_ptr = new std::vector<int>; if u want so, but why ?
Pavel
So,
new std::vector<int>;
works?
Yes, but a vector is almost never needs to be created with new
Anonymous
If an object does not have automatic storage it does not, you need to delete it explicitly. The following leaks
void foo() {
new std::vector<int>{};
}
Anonymous
👆this
Anonymous
Anonymous
So, writing : vector<int > *p = new vector<int>; is correct to write?
I_Interface
Anonymous
Space for vector is made in heap. What does new vector<int> does?
Pavel
cAn you write what your are saying?
auto vec_ptr = new std::vector<int>;
But that's arguable, some codestyles prohibit using auto in this case
Anonymous
I mean what's the difference between
vector<int> v;
and
vector<int> *v = new vector<int>;