Nice Conversation! I am getting answers without asking

Do you have a fully functional, kinda dynamic site running webcpp? Furthermore, more and more web development is moving towards client side rendering, how do you achieve this or isn't this planned?

This is why he is supporting it and you can kill yourself trying to understand it.

You didnt bring any point as to why C# is better fit for the job

Because it's simpler... and I wouldn't have leaks... I don't have to learn to do complex CGI

1) i have written a few, ye 2) client side rendering is a task to be done in js, but I might consider adding webapp possibilities to webcpp

Any examples?

CSharp is used widely but its bloat

https://github.com/Wittmaxi/TodoList/blob/master/todolist.cpp

I think Csharp is not used widely. Popular languages of today is JavaScript, Python, C++, Java, Swift, PHP, Ruby...

how would you implement a chat? reloading the page on every message sent?!

JS with Node isn't really that bad I'm using it with our servers with 10000 devices connected to it using WebSockets and it's working perfectly fine...

no, in a chat i'd use ajax, with some retrieving of data from the js

why noy for the todo list?

Are we talking about how interpreted languages aren worse than compiled ones? Nice

No... I mean for a specific task it doesn't great with very little effort with 0 blocking code.

Thats its intended use

One more question: What languages best suit for back-end web development? PHP? Java? Python? ...

Pure?

One more question: What languages best suit for back-end web development? PHP? Java? Python? ...

Again, depends on what you are trying to do. If it's pure backend stuff you can go with C++. Otherwise I would choose Node, because it's fast to develop, rather easy to scale and is widely supported

php, definitely

I will go with C++, Java and Python

PHP has limitation for exmple global stack, limitations with websockets (hard to do) and backend server controls the threading.

Eveb the creator of java will tell you not to use it😂😂😂

I think he doesn't know the difference between Java and JavaScript.

Dont go with java

Why?

I think he doesn't know the difference between Java and JavaScript.

My suggestion for backend development is to use Node with JS.

I think he doesn't know the difference between Java and JavaScript.

(if you dissagree, I challenge you to write a js interpreter that is faster than bytecode ☺️)

Totally agree with you on that but I'm sorry I wrote our previous system in PHP, it was painful and slow, I rewrote it in NodeJS and it actually feels like 10x faster to my eyes... but I might be wrong but it does.

i have been trying to write a program on 2-D array to print in a circular path. just like this picture.__________________ int main(void) { int m=5, n=m, w=0; int arr[m][n]; int i, k = 0, l = 0; m--, n--; while(k <= m && l <= n) { // Print the row left to right for(i = l; i <= n; ++i) { w=w+1; printf("%d ", w); } // Print the column top to bottom k++; for(i = k; i <= m; ++i) { w=w+1; printf("%d ", w); } // Print the row right to left n--; if(m >= k) { for(i = n; i >= l; --i) { w=w+1; printf("%d ", w); } m--; } // Print the column bottom to top for(i = m; i >= k; --i) { w=w+1; printf("%d ", w); } l++; } printf("\n"); return 0; } ________________________________________ i tried thiscode. but it instead gives this: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 :http://www.studyalgorithms.com/array/print-a-matrix-in-

@BinaryByter

#include <stdio.h> #define SIZE 10 // Size is always even int main() { int i, j, N; int board[SIZE][SIZE]; int left, top; left = 0; top = SIZE - 1; N = 1; for(i=1; i<=SIZE/2; i++, left++, top--) { // Fill from left to right for(j=left; j<=top; j++, N++) { board[left][j] = N; } // Fill from top to down for(j=left+1; j<=top; j++, N++) { board[j][top] = N; } // Fill from right to left for(j=top-1; j>=left; j--, N++) { board[top][j] = N; } // Fill from down to top for(j=top-1; j>=left+1; j--, N++) { board[j][left] = N; } } // Print the pattern for(i=0; i<SIZE; i++) { for(j=0; j<SIZE; j++) { printf("%-5d", board[i][j]); } printf("\n"); } return 0; }

I think that it wiuld be more efficient since you save the inits of the for loops, but i'm not 100% sure