show me them codes
It's simple as this
int&& r = 1;
r = 7;
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
This is valid
BinaryByter
well yes
BinaryByter
where is the difference between this and
BinaryByter
int& r = 1;
BinaryByter
wat?
BinaryByter
@ollirz
BinaryByter
explain
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Reference must refer to an object
BinaryByter
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Damn maxi what Happened to you?!
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
2 month knocked you off xD
BinaryByter
no its just that I never cared to learn rules that I I will never need
BinaryByter
and that will never serve me
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Okay
BinaryByter
you know, learning those rules by heart won't serve you anything
Anonymous
Moo 🐮
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
you know, learning those rules by heart won't serve you anything
You know this are important one
Dima
What?
Dima
so?
BinaryByter
which shows that he hasn't read the rules
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
int& r = 1;
Is wrong
BinaryByter
because its offtopic
Dima
Maybe he's cow nation and that means hello
BinaryByter
yea, now I remember
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
1 isn't an object
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Even it's valid
The question is
Why it can be changed?
BinaryByter
are you SURE that it is valid?
BinaryByter
or is it just your compiler which is not conform to the standard?
BinaryByter
no compiler is completely compliant
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Okay
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Try it on yours
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
I hope it's not valid
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Cuz it'll just confuse me
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Okay
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
I got an idea
BinaryByter
try it on clang
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
How about we test it on Rextester
BinaryByter
== g++
Mihail
Also Lunatic
Mihail
That's just a different reference
Mihail
And not a reference of a reference
Mihail
Apparently called a "rvalue reference"
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
There's no such thing is called reference to reference
BinaryByter
that would make sense
Mihail
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
So what are the parameters in the move constructor
BinaryByter
how about you try it with
(int&)& a = 1;?