FFT is easy

its just a complex integral

its just a complex integral

"just"

well yea

+ the discrete FT is even easier

its just one sum with 3 different variables

(one of which being complex)

Everything looks simple to you, when it clearly isn't

https://invidio.us/watch?v=MY4luNgGfms

here

10 lines of code

(and dan is a very VERY longwinded and dense coder)

or in equation's terms, this

I think the "comments" session is finished

N is the total amount of data, n is the current index of data, k is the frequency

10 lines of code doesn't make it an easy algorithm. I first want to learn the base of it (which is the hard part). I don't like blindly applying a formula

a fourier transform is kind of a magical device, getting why it works intuitively is kinda hard

https://invidio.us/watch?v=spUNpyF58BY

but here

got ya covered, bud

Confused😖

got ya covered, bud

I don't think so. That's 0% rigorous. I like maths, so a video isn't enough for me

Go to sleep, you are tired

Confused😖

Read discrete math

Read discrete math

seems very complicated

Confused😖

the sign at the left is somethign like a "for loop"

the rest is just basic calculation and trig

except for i

think of something multiplied with i as it being on the y axis

the rest is just basic calculation and trig

Ooh ....

its like normal code

We stopped teaching C - Wouter van Ooijen & Jorn Bunk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZUTJ2UNXxI https://redd.it/awuzls @r_cpp

Time to trigger C fanatics!

xD

The biggest problem of continous maths is that computers are discrete, so one must be careful to ensure stability

The biggest problem of continous maths is that computers are discrete, so one must be careful to ensure stability

continuous maths create ways of converting themselves to discrete maths

Time to trigger C fanatics!

😂😂😂they are dead

For you finding an integral, you don't typically solve a lim expression

instead, you just use a formula

a derivative, I meant

https://invidio.us/watch?v=spUNpyF58BY

and btw:

this video is VERY good

you really should watch it

I've already watched it

why don't you just apply the formula then?

Because formulas aren't the problem solvers. An example, there's formulas for polynomials of degree 3 and 4, yet nobody uses them

Because formulas aren't the problem solvers. An example, there's formulas for polynomials of degree 3 and 4, yet nobody uses them

formulas ARE the problem solvers

they are litterally what you want to implement

formulas ARE the problem solvers

Well, I implemented a root finding algorithm for polynomials, and had to discard the formulas for degree 3 and 4 (and there's no general formulas for higher degrees)

its like normal code

OK inbox me with link plz

OK inbox me with link plz

?

OK inbox me with link plz

*boxs you with link*

https://invidio.us/watch?v=spUNpyF58BY

@Maximilian

what about that?

what about that?

Send me that link to my inbox

Send me that link to my inbox

What's your inbox address

Send me that link to my inbox

email?

email?

Yep

email?

Maxi would you send me some motivational email?

Maxi would you send me some motivational email?

ok

ok

Thanks

Cool

If it is what I think

email?

Yeah as you wish but Normally chat its better here could be difficult to find ...

you can send it to yourself

How

How

Look for saved messages or something like that

Look for saved messages or something like that

Got you

Stuff with lines

😂😂😂they are dead

It's hard to stay active when u've carried over weekday's use-after-free() bugs into weekends

Send me that link to my inbox

that's literally the link lol

It's hard to stay active when u've carried over weekday's use-after-free() bugs into weekends

🤔

🤔

u lost ?

u lost ?

as c++ is with out c😶

so what?

What paradigm do you prefer OOP, or procedural

you can't compare them

but OOP is very nice

and helps structure everything