Really? I would prefer a more archaic and primitive world were the angry ones fight face to face until any dies than this shitty modern world with lot of collateral and civils murders.

❤️❤️❤️

Really? I would prefer a more archaic and primitive world were the angry ones fight face to face until any dies than this shitty modern world with lot of collateral and civils murders.

Only the strongest would survive, then. No matter how right or wrong.

That includes if a burglar breaks into your house and is stronger than you.

Only the strongest would survive, then. No matter how right or wrong.

At least there will not be collateral murders, no innocent people dying because of the bombs, chemical weapons or nuclear tech. Something like Braveheart or 300.

That includes if a burglar breaks into your house and is stronger than you.

If it breaks into my home, it will be killed by tech (if we live in such a world). Automatic spears on forece break in aren't hard to achieve

Heh. It's all so very easy, isn't it? :P

Modern life is rubbish.

That includes if a burglar breaks into your house and is stronger than you.

better than Fed banksters who rob your money by their smart(tricky) and modern system

Heh. It's all so very easy, isn't it? :P

yep life is easy and simple ^^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21j_OCNLuYg

better than Fed banksters who rob your money by their smart(tricky) and modern system

Yeah, indeed, damn government who endorse them...

In capitalism this wouldn't happen ;3

Yeah, indeed, damn government who endorse them...

not the govs fault it's their fault even JFK couldnt do anything but killed miserably or our own fault for being ignorant

not the govs fault it's their fault even JFK couldnt do anything but killed miserably or our own fault for being ignorant

How is their fault?

The government provides money and lets them print money.

In capitalism this wouldn't happen ;3

actually I'm against most of capitalism systems but I could learn something good from capitalism

You're against capitalism but you don't actually know it.

Learn a bit about capitalism first. I used to hate capitalism too.

Capitalism is BS and off-topic in here.

The government provides money and lets them print money.

yeah the govts had been infiltrated by them most of the govts guys were already their companions

guys, seriously

or girls, or whatever, don't want to assume anything ?

Those weren't Free at the time Android used it and redistributed it on every phone.

That's the past. Who cares?

Well, happiness is in your mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnLoToJVQH4

of course happiness is all in your mind

where else would it be

your arm?

LMAO

ahah

i mean thats such a meaningless phrase

tru

'happiness is all in your mind'

i mean thats such a meaningless phrase

No.

but i think it's meant to be like

People often get confused because they think money beings them happiness.

like some ppl think that happiness in some outer things

Yes.

as example consuming == happiness

n stuff

Or maybe a relationship

i mean thats such a meaningless phrase

It's like stating "Colours are in your eyes". Yes, of course, that's obvious. And?

yeah

as example consuming == happiness

This

as example consuming == happiness

But it's still in your mind! It is you who think that's happy while someone else may think happiness is something different.

But it's still in your mind! It is you who think that's happy while someone else may think happiness is something different.

yeah true

but like i think the dude in the vid will talk about like u can be happy without having to, like idk, consuming something in this case :D

But it's still in your mind! It is you who think that's happy while someone else may think happiness is something different.

No...

Happiness is permanent.

but just working on it in ur head

i think the term of happiness is really werid to use

What this supposed person think happiness is (through consuming) is actually just impermanent joy.

Happiness is permanent.

Nothing last forever but the certainty of change.

Nothing last forever but the certainty of change.

Agreed.

yeah

Everything is impermanent.

does it mean that windows not always gon be shitty tho?

but just working on it in ur head

OK, let's tell that to the people who is starving and freezing. "It's all in your head". "You shouldn't think in your material needs, that's not true happiness".

does it mean that windows not always gon be shitty tho?

Nah.

dude, i didn't say that I have this point of view calm down D:

everything is related in our lives

does it mean that windows not always gon be shitty tho?

There are only three things that are sure in this life: taxes, death and the shittiness of windows

i mean, everyone just defines it themselves

There are only three things that are sure in this life: taxes, death and the shittiness of windows

ahahha true

i mean, everyone just defines it themselves

i mean the term of happines

ERROR: S client not available

s

There are only three things that are sure in this life: taxes, death and the shittiness of windows

Taxation is theft

OK I'll stop :P

There are only three things that are sure in this life: taxes, death and the shittiness of windows

i mean, you can say it to them, u have every right to, but it doesn't mean that u're right, right?

idk i'll better shut up huehuehue

i mean, you can say it to them, u have every right to, but it doesn't mean that u're right, right?

I was joking.... The Brit saying states only the first two items. Probably because it was invented before Windows.

oh fuck wait

i replied to the wrong meesage

:DDD

What?

LOL

OK, let's tell that to the people who is starving and freezing. "It's all in your head". "You shouldn't think in your material needs, that's not true happiness".

i meant that

:DDDD

Ah

i know u were joking about windows :B

Now it makes more sense.

yeah, sorry :B

i know u were joking about windows :B

(i mean no, windows is really *cough* shitty *cough*)

Windows is an objectively inferior architecture. No need to cough.

true

Linux has low enough market share that virus writers usually don't target Linux beside some occasional proof-of-concepts, which are harmless

Don't most of attacks target servers which almost all of them run on Linux ?

Don't most of attacks target servers which almost all of them run on Linux ?

Attacks != viruses

Also, Attacks != infections

viruse writers usually target the low hanging fruit, which is Windows and its users because of volume, if you'd try 1000 times and suceed 1 time, multuply that enough times and you've got a score

Attacks != viruses

I mean like the last one (wannacry ransomeware), I think the high protection in Linux prevent such disasters

I mean like the last one (wannacry ransomeware), I think the high protection in Linux prevent such disasters

what protection? if you'll run a program which will encrypt all your stuff in your home folder, nothing will prevent you from doing that

what protection? if you'll run a program which will encrypt all your stuff in your home folder, nothing will prevent you from doing that

SELinux could have mitigated most of its functionality.

Among the mitigated functionality is the worm behaviour.