yeah it was thanks ???

@sesivany , according to the wiki: " You can also use 24 for upgrading to Branched or rawhide for upgrading to Rawhide" So let's say I'm still running fc22, with a: $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=23 I can upgrade to fc23, but what's happens if after upgrading to 23 I try to upgrade to 24 by changing the 23 for 24? This will upgrade to 24 beta or nothing will happen? What it's the right process for upgrading to 24 since rawhide points to 25?

@sesivany , according to the wiki: " You can also use 24 for upgrading to Branched or rawhide for upgrading to Rawhide" So let's say I'm still running fc22, with a: $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=23 I can upgrade to fc23, but what's happens if after upgrading to 23 I try to upgrade to 24 by changing the 23 for 24? This will upgrade to 24 beta or nothing will happen? What it's the right process for upgrading to 24 since rawhide points to 25?

You need to upgrade to f23 and when you're on f23 you run the same command just replacing f23 with F24. There is no supported way to upgrade from F22 to F24 directly.

So it is the same process described on the wiki link that @Neville_yn1v shared

Upgrading to 23 and then to 24.

At the end of the upgrading process, what I get? A fc24 beta?

Is there any beta for Spins? I use Cinnamon

https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease it was in the mail announcing the beta release.

Is there any beta for Spins? I use Cinnamon

And on the Fedora Magazine post:

Are you an early adopter? Fedora 24 Beta is out! Enjoy! https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-24-beta-released/

At the end of the upgrading process, what I get? A fc24 beta?

F24 with the latest updates, so something newer than beta, there are already updates that landed after beta freeze.

F24 with the latest updates, so something newer than beta, there are already updates that landed after beta freeze.

Thanks, I still have a fc22 machine ?, so I want to give a try to the fc22->fc23->fc24->rawhide upgrade process.

https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease it was in the mail announcing the beta release.

Doh... Looks like I missed it...

@ne_dima_v Welcome to the group ?

i am just come back. Thank you

@hitmaker Hello man!

? hi there

Thanks, I still have a fc22 machine ?, so I want to give a try to the fc22->fc23->fc24->rawhide upgrade process.

Awesome idea. Good luck ;)

Come back @ne_dima_v ? Who are you?

dima_v ;) So, i was here about 2 months ago. Readonly.

Now i am here because i wanna up my english skills and i fall in love fedora. Its distribution just works. It's just awesome.

Can you say me something about rawhide. Fedora alpha works perfectly for me. Now its beta.. And i want just use it it all time without any version differenciation.

rpmfusion supports only current(23) and rawhide. Right?

rpmfusion supports only current(23) and rawhide. Right?

Is supposed to support F23, but I saw in their packages are pointing to an f22 release, same for Russian Fedora ?

Hello @zheguzai ! Welcome! ?

Hello?

Do i need upgrade? How can i check i use alpha or beta? ?

cat /etc/fedora-release

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade

very nice

vscode 1.1 released

Cool then i Have to update later

Also Linode is updating to 23 in a couple of weeks

Cool then i Have to update later

but it auto-updates

what do you need to do when usb with fedora iso doesn't appear in bios? used fedora 23 iso from bittorent liveusb creator on windows

Buy a new motherboard ;)

not worth also it worked before

not worth also it worked before

Try to figure out if the BIOS is set to boot up first from the HDD at firts.

what do you need to do when usb with fedora iso doesn't appear in bios? used fedora 23 iso from bittorent liveusb creator on windows

I personally recommend using unetbootin.

Try to figure out if the BIOS is set to boot up first from the HDD at firts.

that's what i did

fedora is not in a list

fedora is not in a list

It should be like "General USB Mass Storage Device" or so, I mean it should be the drive's name, not something related to Fedora

i know

there's just one disk in a list

i'm now trying different software

I personally recommend using unetbootin.

Nope, If you are on a UEFI system unetbootin doesn't handle properly this feature, go better for dd on linux, if you don't have a linux machine running try downloading Win32 Disk Manager to copy the iso file to the usb, this tool create an usb bootable for BIOS an UEFI system.

Yes, things like USB-HDD or USB-FDD can affect the visibility of thumb drive in the BIOS

Nope, If you are on a UEFI system unetbootin doesn't handle properly this feature, go better for dd on linux, if you don't have a linux machine running try downloading Win32 Disk Manager to copy the iso file to the usb, this tool create an usb bootable for BIOS an UEFI system.

This is a howto for windows machine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RM17IwSzMU

Nope, If you are on a UEFI system unetbootin doesn't handle properly this feature, go better for dd on linux, if you don't have a linux machine running try downloading Win32 Disk Manager to copy the iso file to the usb, this tool create an usb bootable for BIOS an UEFI system.

Uh, he referred to "BIOS", and I assume he's using a BIOS system.

Uh, he referred to "BIOS", and I assume he's using a BIOS system.

Meh, many people still calling «BIOS» despite been UEFI system.

Also you should give a try to the new official Fedora Live USB Creator: https://mbriza.fedorapeople.org/liveusb-creator.zip

Meh, many people still calling «BIOS» despite been UEFI system.

yep, this

This zip contains the windows installer.

More info here: https://github.com/lmacken/liveusb-creator

Fedora ISO's are the best out there: «Fedora ISO's use isohybrid to write a simultaneously crazy and badass, coherent yet Frankenstein (the monster) MBR+APM+GPT+bootloader jump code that supports BIOS, UEFI, and Apple EFI firmwares on x86_64. It's...amazing.»

rufus worked. a panacea

It

sorry, is booting now?

yes, im installing it already

Great!

sure is

i don't know why liveusb-creator didn't work though. it always worked before

i don't know why liveusb-creator didn't work though. it always worked before

The old fedora live usb creator for windows was missing the feature for handling the creation of a partition system and some firmware required to be able to boot on uefi system, later was added the feature that copy the iso file in a very raw way to the usb, the iso itself is builded to work with MBR+APM+GPT+bootloader thar support bios and uefi, but seems like this feature never arrived to the windows version of this app. I was called «the destructive mode».

That make the same as dd, copy the iso file directly to the device.

cat /etc/fedora-release

It does not contains any text about alpha or beta state

What its said?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ni3h8JCVfs Fedora 24 testing

20minutes in

ERROR: S client not available

cool just found out on this by checking around in Bugzilla looks neat: https://fedorahosted.org/freeotp/

rpmfusion supports only current(23) and rawhide. Right?

Yes, current version only. Once Fedora 24 gets released, RPM fusion will support it. Usually, takes some days.

not worth also it worked before

Happens to me too ?

BTW, I have a question. I want to create a live USB with Fedora 24 Workstation. What program is the best to do so? Under Fedora.

BTW, I have a question. I want to create a live USB with Fedora 24 Workstation. What program is the best to do so? Under Fedora.

how about dd utility?

BTW, I have a question. I want to create a live USB with Fedora 24 Workstation. What program is the best to do so? Under Fedora.

Fedora Media Writer (formerly known Fedora LiveUSB Creator). Look for liveusb-creator package.

That's the officially supported tool now.

Do you guys use Chromium? If yes, from which repo do you get .rpm-s or do you build it yourself?

i always use unetbootin

same unetbootin, Tuxboot or Rufus

for different things

same unetbootin, Tuxboot or Rufus

yumi rocks too :D

@Aztoatl never heard about that

Do you guys use Chromium? If yes, from which repo do you get .rpm-s or do you build it yourself?

hum may be is not a good practice but when i dont fins some package i use rpmfind.net

hum may be is not a good practice but when i dont fins some package i use rpmfind.net

ty, but i'm just checkin'. i added fedora-chromium-stable repository that is maintained by Tom 'spot' Callaway (https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium/) and seems like i'm now suffering from this bug: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=608205 after i've updated other packages

I prefer google-chrome: http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-google-chrome-with-yum-on-fedora-red-hat-rhel/

Hi o/ Does anybody know if torrents files for netinstall isos exists?

Hi o/ Does anybody know if torrents files for netinstall isos exists?

I have only seen this https://torrents.fedoraproject.org/

but that doesn't have netinstall

For some reason direct download are really really sloooooow

But torrents ones are fine. Anyways. Thanks

For some reason direct download are really really sloooooow

I am getting 4min for netinstall here

T_T

20Mb speed

Sweet, almost the same here, but over torrents

but ye 413MB can be faster

T_T

I will try with axel via command line.