Yeah, try to open a 80MB text file in gedit, the background turn all black

GUI editors can't handle that I think

It is great, isn't it? I do all system editing (scripting) stuff with nano :з

nano is sweet. i wish it had some more features like alt+backspace and ctrl+arrows. i use emacs instead these days because it lacks those

And notepad.exe?!

notepad is nice

@Kohane May I say "get out" to Windows users?

no

nano is sweet. i wish it had some more features like alt+backspace and ctrl+arrows. i use emacs instead these days because it lacks those

Nano does have lots of shortcuts!

this group is extremely tolerant

this group is extremely tolerant

:c

i agree

It is not even rude behavior

Just expression of my fillings

tolerance is the word of 2017 mate

be tolerant!

be like sweden

It is like philosophy. Fedora uses only(I guess) free software. I hate windows Almost the same!

be like sweden

I have Sweden friend. We study together

It is like philosophy. Fedora uses only(I guess) free software. I hate windows Almost the same!

idk dude. fedora uses free software and proprietary drivers

i guess this is fair

idk dude. fedora uses free software and proprietary drivers

Not really.

Proprietary drivers are excluded from official repos

...no?

Free-er than Debian!

...no?

...Yes?

i thought fedora made an exception for proprietary drivers.

Proprietary drivers are excluded from official repos

с:

ive read fedorawiki and it says so

and fsf's page on fedora says so too

Nvidia drivers are certainly not there.

not nvidia but a bunch of others are

Maybe just for network drivers.

and the kernel isn't deblobbed, i'd imagine.

Proprietary drivers are excluded from official repos

Nobody read the Intel wifi driver license?

LOL WHO CARES ITS JUST A LICENSE!!!!!!

zomg

LOL WHO CARES ITS JUST A LICENSE!!!!!!

Fedora, Debian...

LOL WHO CARES ITS JUST A LICENSE!!!!!!

Uhm.

Fedora Packagers, Debian Maintainers.

why are you talking to a brickwall frien

Because nobody loves me.

*cries*

The point is: Fedora has propietary software in its repo.

Because nobody loves me.

sad bro

The point is: Fedora has propietary software in its repo.

ya

Wat dis

check the reply.

the repo downloads the software from sourceforge. i REALLY feel like i am in good hands

SourceForge

id rather switch to windows than use this

Yep.

i guess im screwed with fedora if i want to play some games.

well. time to go arch or something.

maybe ubuntu

installing Chinese rootkit...

maybe ubuntu

No.

Arch.

installing Chinese rootkit...

yeah haha

No.

why are people so against ubuntu? i understand why you wouldnt use ubuntu because its by a corporation, but why would you not use an ubuntu-based fork such as kde neon?

kde neon seems great tbh

why are people so against ubuntu? i understand why you wouldnt use ubuntu because its by a corporation, but why would you not use an ubuntu-based fork such as kde neon?

It's useless to me.

It's a mess with a million repositories scattered around everywhere.

"LOOL NOOBUNTUU" i don't care about being a noob. i just want a functional operating system with preferably zero proprietary elements

Having Arch there is no reason to use Ubuntu.

"LOOL NOOBUNTUU" i don't care about being a noob. i just want a functional operating system with preferably zero proprietary elements

Then you don't want Ubuntu lol.

unfortunately its not possible with this computer so ill just have to use something that does have proprietary drivers and such

ERROR: S client not available

Then you don't want Ubuntu lol.

trisquel is a free distro and its ubuntu-based

Having Arch there is no reason to use Ubuntu.

ive used arch and i disagree, i don't really get whats so great about it. im pretty sure most people use it just for 1337 hacker cred

trisquel is a free distro and its ubuntu-based

But not Ubuntu.

ive used arch and i disagree, i don't really get whats so great about it. im pretty sure most people use it just for 1337 hacker cred

The AUR is unmatched.

There is nothing like the AUR.

aur is cool but it's unnecessary imo.

Absolutely necessary.

i don't wanna trust some random dudes on aur to take care of my software, lol.

That's why you read every AUR package you install.

Vs, say, install some random binary only PPA

id rather just update them myself

id rather just update them myself

Good luck.

Vs, say, install some random binary only PPA

ppas suck. i agree.

And AUR is the best thing ever.

i don't wanna trust some random dudes on aur to take care of my software, lol.

++

installing Chinese rootkit...

PostInstallerF will install all necessary, after to run first time Fedora. Its easy for new user. PostInstallerF contains everything you need.

hehehe

And AUR is the best thing ever.

AUR is cool, i get it. its really cool. but its not enough for me to want to use arch.

instead its something that every distro should have

like fedora has copr

but copr isnt safe enough

Copr is far from AUR.

i dont know if it lets you check the "pkgbuild"

Copr is far from AUR.

not much imo

It's more like Gentoo overlays.

not much imo

Very much. Yes.

aur is just a community repo where any wanker can throw their shit on

its not that big of a deal, man.

Full with comments, voting, and integrated into a single hub to search all the packages on instead of 50 different sources.

It's a big deal indeed.

its such a simple thing.

every distro should have it