leviathan [ modern desktop] sees hephaestus [mac], it pings and stuff

is it normal for retired fedora packages to just up and not have a dead.package

leviathan [ modern desktop] sees hephaestus [mac], it pings and stuff

Sounds like firewall not allowing connection on ftp port.

basically, i can;t connect via a twisted pair cabl;e from Power Mac G3/OS9.2.2 to my desktop with Fedora [ vsftpd]

But what about wifi? It might be much easier

basically, i can;t connect via a twisted pair cabl;e from Power Mac G3/OS9.2.2 to my desktop with Fedora [ vsftpd]

If you want to have a quick test run and are 100% local sudo systemctl stop firewalld

be sure to reboot or restart the service as soon as you can

But what about wifi? It might be much easier

none

be sure to reboot or restart the service as soon as you can

after stopping firewalld?

after stopping firewalld?

Stop, test then reboot

i stopped but it chagmned nothing

Can you ping the machine?

i can ping the mac

I.P. you mean? In that Case, whats the exact error? maybe the service isnt configured right

i can ping mac from linux ; when i connect to linux via ftp it is unable to connect ;' vsftpd is listening on ipv4

is there any (more or less) safe method for installing spotify in fedora without negativo17 repo?

is there any (more or less) safe method for installing spotify in fedora without negativo17 repo?

build the rpm package by urself

how can I learn to build the rpm?

how can I learn to build the rpm?

There is a guide in the Fedora wiki

or just convert deb package to rpm package through alien

or just download & install from here: http://negativo17.org/repos/spotify/fedora-25/x86_64/spotify-client-1.0-6.fc25.x86_64.rpm (then remove negativo17 repo if the repo installed automatically)

Hello group. We are organizing OSCAL in Albania and we invite all interested people that want to apply with a talk/workshop: http://oscal.openlabs.cc/oscal-2017-call-for-proposals/

Here is our media corner in order to spread the word about OSCAL: http://oscal.openlabs.cc/media-corner/

For sure we will have Fedora Infobooth and Fedora talks/workshops :)

Hi, I have a newbie question, again :(

I'm running some backup scripts, but they really consumpt a lot of CPU, the problem is the following: There are 3 scripts, and I don't have idea how much time take each one, so I try to do this: scriptA && scriptB && scriptC

But still scriptB is not waiting until scriptA finish its job, and scriptC is not waiting for scriptB

Then the bzip2 and gzip commands are running at the same time (because A and B and C are using gzip and bzip), consumming all the CPU

How can i force that a script wait until previos script finish its execution?

?

usualy the && will make the next program to wait before processing the next one though ?

Corect me if i'm wrong

usualy the && will make the next program to wait before processing the next one though ?

If first command return exit code 0, then the second will be executed

After &&

If ; instead of &&, second command will be executed anyway

I guess

That's what I expect, but it doesn't

That's what I expect, but it doesn't

With ;?

is it normal for retired fedora packages to just up and not have a dead.package

No

No, with &&

Well, I don't know, I'm just seeng the 3 scripts beeing executed at the same time, consuming all the CPU ?

maybe there're some more conditions

PSA: LastPass Does Not Encrypt Everything In Your Vault https://hackernoon.com/psa-lastpass-does-not-encrypt-everything-in-your-vault-8722d69b2032?gi=478e145b57ec

?

PSA: LastPass Does Not Encrypt Everything In Your Vault https://hackernoon.com/psa-lastpass-does-not-encrypt-everything-in-your-vault-8722d69b2032?gi=478e145b57ec

I think MasterPassword is better

I think MasterPassword is better

Agreed. But I use KeePass

PSA: LastPass Does Not Encrypt Everything In Your Vault https://hackernoon.com/psa-lastpass-does-not-encrypt-everything-in-your-vault-8722d69b2032?gi=478e145b57ec

gooood daaaammit

KeePass FTW!

Anything open source and not cloud based is an OK by me ?

it also looses records...

Synced with dropbox

Synced with dropbox

dropbox is the worst

dropbox is the worst

Disagree. See OneDrive.

dropbox is the worst

It makes the work

I use my own cloud via SyncThing so there's that.

Disagree. See OneDrive.

OneDrive too

OneDrive too

I mean Dropbox isn't the worst because there's OneDrive ?

I mean Dropbox isn't the worst because there's OneDrive ?

I don't even know which is more crappier

I use neither so I don't care ??‍♂

I use neither so I don't care ??‍♂

I used both... The crappiest crap I've ever seen

PSA: LastPass Does Not Encrypt Everything In Your Vault https://hackernoon.com/psa-lastpass-does-not-encrypt-everything-in-your-vault-8722d69b2032?gi=478e145b57ec

Use KeePass 2.x (mono) or KeePassX 2.0 (Qt). Both available in Fedora repositories.

I should code my own password manager

With blackjack and sync

I should code my own password manager

Rule 1: never code anything using your own cryptography.

ERROR: S client not available

Use KeePass 2.x (mono) or KeePassX 2.0 (Qt). Both available in Fedora repositories.

Indeed

Rule 1: never code anything using your own cryptography.

+1

I don't like the Mono version though. I only use DotNet on Windows. So: never.

Also you can sync your KeePass container using one of available cloud providers: Dropbox, Google Drive, Mega, etc.

Oii

Also you can sync your KeePass container using one of available cloud providers: Dropbox, Google Drive, Mega, etc.

Better to use Sync or SyncThing

Better to use Sync or SyncThing

I prefer rsync to my own server. ?

I prefer rsync to my own server. ?

Like own sync server?

I prefer rsync to my own server. ?

Manually?

I wouldn't do that myself.

Manually?

Yes, but you can use filesystem watchers.

Yes, but you can use filesystem watchers.

?

I'd rather not worry with that

Plus the above are p2p

Fast as hell

And reliable too.

I can also sync to somewhere using encryption, so that the data there can't be read by anyone, because it uses a special key.

Hi, I have a newbie question, again :(

why you don make a file named scriptABC.sh with the following lines: scriptA scriptB scriptC Then chmod +x scriptABC.sh finally ./scriptABC.sh &

that is my noob approach to your problem

why you don make a file named scriptABC.sh with the following lines: scriptA scriptB scriptC Then chmod +x scriptABC.sh finally ./scriptABC.sh &

That's clever! I will try that

you can even insert a line "sleep 60 " if you want to give a pause before comminting to the new script

But what about syncing with mobile phone?

That's clever! I will try that

it is not clever, it is very simple. I would love to hear if somebody has a better solution.

it is not clever, it is very simple. I would love to hear if somebody has a better solution.

Create service from that script?

Create service from that script?

duh... so obvious!! I didn't think of that. Thanks

duh... so obvious!! I didn't think of that. Thanks

Wut? Really?

Wut? Really?

Really ... I am a noob in so many regards

Really ... I am a noob in so many regards

Nobody knows everything.

Really ... I am a noob in so many regards

Welp Okay then

That's why we are social creatures. To help each other.

?

Well that probably need a deeper research, I need to learn how to make a service