But holy shit, my /var without /var/opt and /var/cache used about 12 gb

Now I loved tiny 5

Okay, just checked. I don't have all that stuff.

Good luck)

Now I loved tiny 5

Tiny 5 ?

BTW, how can anyone clean the temporary files in root? Is there any way, like a command or a program or something?

* sits down and waits for @Wolfshappen to get triggered saying this and that will break the system *

https://flatkill.org/

I strongly dislike Flatpak. I use only when I have no other options left. Gnome Recipes in example has no RPM, and won't have if it depends on the main developer. Last time I used Flatpak I notice that now it shows the dependencies and asks before installing. But says nothing about the amount of data that will take or how much space will it needs after install.

BTW, how can anyone clean the temporary files in root? Is there any way, like a command or a program or something?

I'm curious, is someone use a real server solutions, if write such thing.

I still don't understand what's the point about Flatpak. There are repos and packages... what is this for?

I'm curious, is someone use a real server solutions, if write such thing.

Uh? Sorry, I didn't understand you. Would you mind to rephrase, please?

I say, if someone say to never use root for administration, even personal laptop. Then does he ever administrate any type of server?

At all

I still don't understand what's the point about Flatpak. There are repos and packages... what is this for?

Well. Platform-independent package control

That as fat as java

Ooops, )

And messy as hell.

I say, if someone say to never use root for administration, even personal laptop. Then does he ever administrate any type of server?

Uhmmm.... I don't think so.

That as fat as java

so fatpak would be a better name?

Why would anyone want to fill their home folders with system files?

so fatpak would be a better name?

Can we contribute it?

Why would anyone want to fill their home folders with system files?

by system files you mean?

I like it. I think it should be renamed to fatpak.

by system files you mean?

It creates a /var with all the files from the app in the user's folder. Normally those files go to system folders somewhere under /

It's a waste of space.

It creates a /var with all the files from the app in the user's folder. Normally those files go to system folders somewhere under /

well, I think it worked, on my laptop

but I`m not really happy

I never give more then 15 gb to root

cuantos mb pesa un flatpak? te hago la pregunta xq en fedora intente instalar un flatpak el gestor de software me decia que 1,6 gb y me parecio una tremenda exageracion

cuantos mb pesa un flatpak? te hago la pregunta xq en fedora intente instalar un flatpak el gestor de software me decia que 1,6 gb y me parecio una tremenda exageracion

Please, use English only. This is an international group.

cuantos mb pesa un flatpak? te hago la pregunta xq en fedora intente instalar un flatpak el gestor de software me decia que 1,6 gb y me parecio una tremenda exageracion

The file itself usually is just a few kbs. But that doesn't include all the dependencies and the software, so installing it can be as small as one or two megas or as big as gigas. And no, it won't warn you. Not at least if you do it through console.

Do you have any problem with chrome? 1) the iso file icon does not appear (usually an image of a cd) 2) there is that graphic error that makes the image shake ... I made sure that the problem only happens on fedora, trying the same thing on ubuntu and centos

What a weird behaviour....

Looks like it has hyccups.

Icons depend on your icon set and desktop configuration, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.

But the hyccup/shaking is definitely wrong. That shouldn't happen.

Icons depend on your icon set and desktop configuration, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.

But this too is strange, because I use the default theme and icons ...

I have just noticed that the same problems also happen on firefox!!

Okay

That looks like a graphics problem

I have just noticed that the same problems also happen on firefox!!

What GPU do you have?

I haven’t downloaded anything big enough to notice a problem. Normally my downloads are small so they’re done in seconds.

What GPU do you have?

I don't have gpu

Only integrated in i5

What device?

What device?

lenovo yoga 520

That looks like a graphics problem

I don't think so , because it happen also in virtualbox

I don't think so , because it happen also in virtualbox

Virtualbox also uses the system graphics

we've seen crazy flickering at work if Fedora is virtualized in VirtualBox on a macOS host

and Wayland is used. Wayland on Linux host is fine, Xorg on macOS host is also fine

That's actually pretty interesting

Virtualbox also uses the system graphics

anyway, this aren't this problem in centos or ubuntu..

BTW, how can anyone clean the temporary files in root? Is there any way, like a command or a program or something?

bleachbit, else specify more what you mean by temporary root files :P

* sits down and waits for @Wolfshappen to get triggered saying this and that will break the system *

I dont get triggered, i usually have valid doubts about things and recommend not doing certain things. :P

This is the proper way to ask others to think about improving their communication when trying to contribute to any FLOSS Project. Forcing or blindly enforcing is not OK. "...Therefore, we ask all contributors to make a conscious effort..." https://lwn.net/Articles/769167/rss

2018 and an Autistic man has it clearer than NT people ? The GNU Project encourages contributions from anyone who wishes to advance the development of the GNU system, regardless of gender, race, religion, cultural background, and any other demographic characteristics, as well as personal political views.

Resus Stallman

This is the proper way to ask others to think about improving their communication when trying to contribute to any FLOSS Project. Forcing or blindly enforcing is not OK. "...Therefore, we ask all contributors to make a conscious effort..." https://lwn.net/Articles/769167/rss

I like this

Stallman for president

Stallman for president

I WANT THIS TRENDING TOPIC NOW!

why is mono-tools not installable?

why is mono-tools not installable?

Could you please care to elaborate?

Mmm I don't have how to reproduce that, I'm using fc28, please consider upgrading to a recent release given fc26 is unmaintained. Actual releases that are currently maintained are fc27 and fc28.

i have fc28

look at Release line on your screenshot

idk whats happening

look at Release line on your screenshot

LOL you are right.

Fedora 29 is planned to release on 2018-10-23 which is 15 hours, 20 minutes, and 32 seconds from now

Fedora 29 is planned to release on 2018-10-23 which is 15 hours, 20 minutes, and 32 seconds from now

Wasn't it pushed to 30 due to blockers?

All blockers unblocked?

I got it from zodbot

@Wolfshappen @Kohane

Mmm I don't have how to reproduce that, I'm using fc28, please consider upgrading to a recent release given fc26 is unmaintained. Actual releases that are currently maintained are fc27 and fc28.

What about "fc"? Fedora Core? it has gone away....

resolved by removing fedora-obsolete-packages-28-6.noarch and installing webkitgtk from 26

yes, same to you..

Is it a chrome specific glitch?

lenovo yoga 520

Doh... All the Yoga line gives me headache. I tried to install stuff in two of them and it's a nightmare. Why did you choose a Yoga laptop? Question out of curiosity, not criticising or anyhting.

I have a lattitude :) Everything is good here

and Wayland is used. Wayland on Linux host is fine, Xorg on macOS host is also fine

Wayland on Gnome is fine. Have you tried it on KDE, or any other desktop? It has flaws to say the less.

I have a lattitude :) Everything is good here

Yeah, I have a Lenovo Thinkpad and all is good and well. But my question was directed to @TeoCol7

My co workers says thinkpad are not good with hardware

My co workers says thinkpad are not good with hardware

Thats bs.

That's why I took the Latittude. otherwise I was gonna go with Thinkpad in the first place

My co workers says thinkpad are not good with hardware

that's not true

Thinkpads are some of the best built, sturdiest machines around. The old T6X series and the newer x2X0 and t4X0 are some of the most amazing machines ever.

My co workers says thinkpad are not good with hardware

Compared to what is not good?

They have lowered in build quality for their current lineup a little - but only to go thinner, yet last longer on battery.