anyone know how to prevent gnome turning off screen while playing video in smplayer?

Fullscreen smplayer

thanks, I will try it

Oh and try mpv as well (fullscreen) - best media player out there.

anyone know how to prevent gnome turning off screen while playing video in smplayer?

mpv or vlc is better....

Does mpv make use of dbus screensaver or xscreensaver?

Oh and try mpv as well (fullscreen) - best media player out there.

well, I'm using smplayer with mpv as backend

well, I'm using smplayer with mpv as backend

mpv standalone uses less ram and handles just as nice.

Does mpv make use of dbus screensaver or xscreensaver?

Afaik gnome just doesnt lock automatically if any application is fullscreen.

And i mean, real fullscreen, not just pulled big to cover the screen.

Afaik gnome just doesnt lock automatically if any application is fullscreen.

Have you tried it on wayland?

Have you tried it on wayland?

I have not seen gnome lock with mpv fullscreen when watching a movie.

xscreensaver is not supported in wayland

mpv standalone uses less ram and handles just as nice.

the reason I like to use smplayer is "send video to screen", usefull when I'm presentating video

I have not seen gnome lock with mpv fullscreen when watching a movie.

Actually It happened to me. Maybe it depends on the driver.

xscreensaver is not supported in wayland

Whatever happens, i had friends over and my lock screen time is set to 15 Minutes.

And while watching several season of shows and eating and stuff it didnt lock

mpv or vlc is better....

SMPlayer is a frontend for mpv.

SMPlayer is a frontend for mpv.

If set up, but i still use mpv "naked".

SMPlayer is a frontend for mpv.

yes, I know, I have used it before, and its interface is very suitable for Chinese people.

But I use mpv directly now.

Fedora 28 - setup Samba Domain Controller (samba samba-dc) according to server-world instructions. Trying to use RSAT/ADUC on Win10 machine. Has issues connecting and working until I turn off the Firewall on Fedora. I've opened a lot of ports and services in addition to the ones listed in server-world tutorial, but have to shut off Firewall Service.

Can I build some package on a VM and install it on my host

The thing is I don't want to install unnecessary deps just to build a package. So I was thinking to build it on a VM

The thing is I don't want to install unnecessary deps just to build a package. So I was thinking to build it on a VM

Build it using mock instead and clean it afterwards.

Can you elaborate?

I am not much familier with fedora

Can you elaborate?

Mock uses its own chroot and start installing deps in that chroot itself. When building is complete, it generates the package and cleans the chroot.

That sounds nice.

Btw What are you trying to build?

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki

Is this the correct page?

Btw What are you trying to build?

rofi

I can't install it by dnf

Is this the correct page?

Yes.

Also, you can use copr(though right now it is having some issues)

Yeah I used copr but it kept giving me Errors

This one

So I thought I'd better build it

Yeah I used copr but it kept giving me Errors

They are having issues with the storage.

I could not understand anything from this mock thingy

The terminologies are foreign to me

I have added my user to mock group

Can anyone tell me in simple words, what's next

I have added my user to mock group

Re login?

no like how to generate the rpm binary

i have the git repository cloned

no like how to generate the rpm binary

First you should create a srpm

mock --buildsrpm --spec=<yourspecfile>.spec --sources=<sources;>

You can also add —resultdir=<adirectory> to set the output result

I don't have a spec file

I don't have a spec file

You're building rpm right?

yes

You need a spec file

Show me your repo

Please

https://github.com/DaveDavenport/rofi

https://github.com/DaveDavenport/rofi

Oh it's the upstream repo

yeah

yeah

You need to create a spec file for it.

okay. where can I read about it

okay. where can I read about it

http://rpm.org/documentation

ERROR: S client not available

Sorry mate, i just checked: my mobo used 1.0.0.2a + SMU 43.18. So i have no clue after all about this. Since it is cheap mobo, who knows will i receive this update at all or not :)

Hi, I have fast question: someone have problem with hdmi output after last week fedora 29 updates (nvidia card)?

Hi, I have fast question: someone have problem with hdmi output after last week fedora 29 updates (nvidia card)?

Fedora 29 is still in beta, things are expected too break

For stability, please use Fedora 28, or wait for 29 stable to be released

I know that, I just wonder that someone have similar problem

I know that, I just wonder that someone have similar problem

I wouldn't count on it, people don't run untested software on their daily machines usually

Ok, thank you

How are you doing, Fedora Community?

watching football match

How are you doing, Fedora Community?

Trying to decide what system to install, Fedora, Debian testing or Arch. I want it with KDE and the laptop has 8GB RAM so speed is not a concern, it will be fast regardless the system.

https://youtu.be/z_dl9IIihyY

Good for Gnome desktop

@ikhwan_xoar Hello, welcome ?

Good morning, I'm new to the fedora world!

Good morning, I'm new to the fedora world!

wish you very much fun exploring the fedora world!

Pablo @verchtt Welcome, bienvenidos ?

Good morning, I'm new to the fedora world!

Hey hi! Welcome! Feel free to participate and send questions.

Good for Gnome desktop

Yes, it's a point of view like any other. And I do agree that Kontakt is messy. But I wouldn't change desktop just for that; there are so many other similar programs like Evolution and Thunderbird, that you can use in KDE.

@jwflory thanks

https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-29-Looking-Great

Oracle is shit...period. Use openjdk.

Oracle is shit...period. Use openjdk.

If you're gonna make a comment like that, at least attempt to justify it. Or better, don't make such comments at all.

If you're gonna make a comment like that, at least attempt to justify it. Or better, don't make such comments at all.

oracle hate doesn't need to be justified imo

fuck oracle

....

There is a code of conduct here, do you know that, @notafile?

If you're gonna make a comment like that, at least attempt to justify it. Or better, don't make such comments at all.

The last (in a large series of) debacles should still be on all our minds - where java se downloads are now default to a "no commercial usage" download, to force companies to buy for it when they realize its too late.

+1

There is a code of conduct here, do you know that, @notafile?

.

Oracle(l) hate over all their actions, destructive behaviour in the open source community and general douchery/lawyer intimidation is pretty justified imho.