Wait

Dropbox?

Using the desktop version?

Yeap

Which Fedora version do you have?

A long long time ago somebody found a process or daemon from dropbox lurking beyond its limits at /

Which Fedora version do you have?

fc.24

I found something from an official mailing list.

Look for this at fedora-users mailing list: Chrome not Chromium on Fedora 24

fc.24

Are you using the RPM Fusion version of Dropbox?

Are you using the RPM Fusion version of Dropbox?

No, no. That's why I don't use it.

Me too, without flash, for stuff that requires flash I use google-chrome.

I definitely recommend chromium from RussianFedora repos. It does support side codecs (along with pepper-flash). The one maintained by Top Spot Callaway in official repo doesn't allow to use any.

I definitely recommend chromium from RussianFedora repos. It does support side codecs (along with pepper-flash). The one maintained by Top Spot Callaway in official repo doesn't allow to use any.

You are right ?

No, no. That's why I don't use it.

hmm, I didn't hear about the "lurking problem". I use that repository without problems with SELinux

have you tried Chromium?

Lol

Lol

?

hmm, I didn't hear about the "lurking problem". I use that repository without problems with SELinux

It's an old issue. Not sure if still happening...

It's an old issue. Not sure if still happening...

For me is a "Nope nope nope, thanks , but nope"

It's an old issue. Not sure if still happening...

but I thought it depends of the Dropbox version, not the repo you are using

You are right ?

I myself use chromium from RFR (: html5 works absolutely fine.

I will give a try to it.

hope you won't be disappointed

Does anybody here is using polari?

currently I can live without Flash

Actually last time I've been prompted to install flash, like a month or so ago, I felt too lazy to do so, and I never needed it again. So I think I will live my life without missing Flash LOL

Hello does any one here still using KDE 3?

Agghhh.... That looks to much like Windows.... With all respect!

And no, I don't use KDE 3, I didn't know it was available.

Agghhh.... That looks to much like Windows.... With all respect!

LOL, its Q4os, debian based distro using Trinity DE.

argh dat installer

Whyyy

Yeah... It's so ugly... The manu is ugly as well... No offense intended but... aah...

Whyyy

The synaptic running under background. I just read from Full circle Magz

Noted for accardo.

Yeah... It's so ugly... The manu is ugly as well... No offense intended but... aah...

I guess plasma is way more beautiful than that, ?

People seem to like wizards

Maybe I'll make my whole system a wizard

Install wizard would like to install install wizard

/s

Maybe I'll make my whole system a wizard

That's Will make your system bloated. I just share info case of ppl want to teach GNU/Linux to end user.

I guess plasma is way more beautiful than that, ?

I'm not using Plasma 5 right now. But as long as this looks like Windows and I don't find Windows particularly beautiful, yes, it looks better than that.

Just to be fair, I don't find OSX really pretty either. Everything is grey and looking alike... quite boring to me

OSX design is really awfull, especially the dock's background

I'm sorry, it's called macOS now

doesn't make it any better

Ah! Someone finally agrees with me!

porfirio has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

porfirio has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

If you delete them, what happens?

My gut feeling is that you added them twice, once in Google and once in Evolution

Let me see, but last time I wanted to delete them it was impossible, at least from Evolution

Confirmed fact: I cannot delete them from Evolution

I didn't add them twice, that's for sure. And they weren't showing up this way a week ago

Try deleting the whole account and re-adding it. That might resolve it. I'd also reverify you don't have them twice in Google and have hidden one

Uhm... that's a good idea, I will take a look at Google Calendar. There are really too many calendars there and some of them are useless

I'll tell you if it works in a moment...

?

Guys is fedora related to kali-linux??

Why is this smiley wrapped in a cloak?

ERROR: S client not available

Guys is fedora related to kali-linux??

Not at all

Indeed, Kali is based on Debian, not even any rh distro.

Guys is fedora related to kali-linux??

No. And nobody should relate to Kali.

Its for a very specific Purpose and 99% of Users should not use it for what they do

@Tobias4X What specific purpose? I thought Kali was some KDE-oriented distro...

Kali is for network pentesting and 'hacking'

Ah, okay, thanks. I had the wrong idea about it.

All the 'cool' kids install it and feel cool because they now have linux and all those tools

@Tobias4X What specific purpose? I thought Kali was some KDE-oriented distro...

With alarming frequency I see posts on this subreddit involving relatively basic troubleshooting questions from users running Kali Linux. I wrote this as a response to that. I think Kali Linux is great. I just don't think everybody should be using it as a desktop OS. The TL;DR for this post could be taken straight from the Kali FAQ: "If you are unfamiliar with Linux generally, if you do not have at least a basic level of competence in administering a system, if you are looking for a Linux distribution to use as a learning tool to get to know your way around Linux, or if you want a distro that you can use as a general purpose desktop installation, Kali Linux is probably not what you are looking for." Dear Linux noobs, Linux is cool. You're interested in Linux and that makes you cool too. You should be proud of your interest in Linux. You're now part of a community that is full of cool people (OK, a few of us are jerks, but what can you do). What else is cool? Computer hacking. Password cracking. Network penetration. These things are neat, and the people who can do them are usually pretty cool too (though some of them are jerks too). Learning to do these things is fun, and if you want to do it, you should. When practiced responsibly, these things can make fun hobbies, or even a lucrative career. The purpose of this post is not to discourage anybody from learning to do these things. One of the major problems new Linux users face when starting out is figuring out which Linux distribution is right for them. There are a lot of options after all. Everybody likes to recommend their favorite distro (and also occasionally give their opinion on their least favorite distro). Very frequently I see questions in this subreddit, and in related subreddits, like "What distro should I use?", "I want to learn to code, what distro would be good for me?", "What is the best distro for python programming?", or "What distro should I use to learn penetration testing?". New Linux users who might be interested in penetration testing (or some other related topic) might, by some means or another, discover Kali Linux. They might think "Hey, I want to learn Linux and also pen-testing! I should use Kali Linux." They'd probably be wrong. The thing is, most desktop distributions provide access to the same software. If you want to watch Youtube videos and write email, Ubuntu, Mint, Fedora, etc, are all equally capable of that. If you want to learn python programming, you can do that on any of those distributions. Similarly, if you want to learn pen-testing, you can do it from any of those distributions. Kali Linux is a distribution specifically designed to be a toolkit for professional pen-testers. As such, it might be very attractive to new Linux users who are interested in security. However, Kali is /not/ designed as a general purpose Linux distro. Some elements of it's design are simply not suited for use as a general purpose desktop. If you're a new Linux user who installs Kali Linux chances are you will have a frustrating experience. The Kali Linux maintainers even have a FAQ page "Is Kali Linux right for me?" http://docs.kali.org/introduction/should-i-use-kali-linux Please read that article before deciding to use Kali as a desktop OS, especially if you're new to Linux. If you don't yet understand some of the points made in that article that's probably a sign to avoid Kali for now. It's quite often that I see people asking questions like "How do I do X in Kali Linux?" or "[Kali] Y is not working. Please help." Unfortunately these users don't usually get the help they need, which makes me sad. The posts are often dismissed or downvoted. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'd wager that most of the people asking these questions don't need Kali. They need a desktop distribution. I am worried that if your first adventures with Linux are in Kali you will have a frustrating experience and be turned off from the whole endeavor. Your questions might be dismissed and left unanswered because you appear to be in over your head

Sorry for Copypasta

Nah, is fine. This was very interesting and showed me how wrong I was about Kali Linux. Thank you veyr much for clarifying the point.

Guys is fedora related to kali-linux??

Both are Linux

So there's that

Close the door at leaving lol

That was the worst joke i've read xD

@Tobias4X What specific purpose? I thought Kali was some KDE-oriented distro...

Backtrack , Kali's predecessor was primarily shipped with KDE. It was based on Slackware and later Ubuntu.

Backtrack , Kali's predecessor was primarily shipped with KDE. It was based on Slackware and later Ubuntu.

Point stands, dont use it as daily driver.

Go to Settings->Calendars and look there. It is possible to hide calendars from that list in Google Calendar.

Oh! Okay, let me see that...

Thanks

Point stands, dont use it as daily driver.

Maybe something like Backbox is better suited for daily driver

Its a nice distro btw

teledora has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

Maybe something like Backbox is better suited for daily driver

Something like Fedora is better suited for a daily driver

Something like Fedora is better suited for a daily driver

Or Arch

Security Researched focused Distros are not for daily use

Or Arch

Not for beginners

Not for beginners

True

And not for serious professionals