Likely not even at all unless its CS2 or an old, genuine, non-cc version.

But most likely not at all.

You don't need Photoshop. Just use Krita or GIMP.

Try out DigiKam or Black... idk how the latter one is called.

You don't need Photoshop. Just use Krita or GIMP.

Krita for photo editing?

You don't need Photoshop. Just use Krita or GIMP.

For actual editing theres more powerful tools, even if many seem to hate gimp and similar software.

But yes, for painting and the poor sai souls there is krita.

https://www.darktable.org/

This one for example.

https://www.darktable.org/

Rawtherapee for RAW however

Krita for photo editing?

Gimp for editing, Krita for painting.

Isn't the general rule of thumb inkscape for rasters, gimp for vectors, or is that wrong

And do show how you edit out humans using it.

Isn't the general rule of thumb inkscape for rasters, gimp for vectors, or is that wrong

what, no.

Inkscape for any kind of vector, krita for raster drawing, gimp for editing.

Ah, I don't do much drawing so I'm not an expert at that stuff

But sadly gimp should start the same crowdfunding as krita as it is in much needed state of touchups and simplifications for users.

And maybe loadtimes too ?

ignoring the different purposes of Gimp and Krita, I appreciate Krita much more.

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

I'm studying that shit right now. They start teaching basic derivatives/integrals in grade 10. By grade 11, that gets real high level.

I wouldn’t call it shit, it was interesting. And if I want to apply to a university I won’t have to study it because I already did.

Linux/GNU would probably be the right version

I'd call it "wannabemacosbutnotyetasgoodaswindows10"

Linux/GNU would probably be the right version

Too annoying. Leave it as Linux. Anyway, hardly anyone will bother to say the whole sentence.

Too annoying. Leave it as Linux. Anyway, hardly anyone will bother to say the whole sentence.

actually nobody does

but when we talk about Linux itself we should say "GNU/Linux"

No. Why? And what do you mean with “Linux itself”?

actually nobody does

Exactly.

ya'll hate stallman

I don’t hate him. He just gets on my nerves.

No. Why? And what do you mean with “Linux itself”?

some abstract linux-based operating system... like model (or parent) for all linux distros.. kinda

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

Talking to people who use Linux, reading articles from time to time, checking out what popular distros come with by default or tend to use.

I'm pretty damn sure I found Krita on KDE's website.

we need a Linux specified history guy

You mean someone specialised in Linux history?

I'm pretty damn sure I found Krita on KDE's website.

Krita is part of KDE Project.

I was like "I could have seen it on KDE's website first, or some other"

Krita is part of KDE Project.

No. They separated Krita from KOffice to standalone project.

some abstract linux-based operating system... like model (or parent) for all linux distros.. kinda

Oh, something theoretical like the spherical cow?

No. They separated Krita from KOffice to standalone project.

What does belonging to KDE Project have to do with KOffice itself?

No. They separated Krita from KOffice to standalone project.

Yes, but still KDE

For instance... does RSIBreak or Zanshin have to do with KOffice?

You mean someone specialised in Linux history?

Yeah, in this chat who might tell us real facts...

Oh, something theoretical like the spherical cow?

yup in the vacuum

GNU is the only Operating System, and Linux is one of its many kernels.

Yeah, in this chat who might tell us real facts...

You can read books about it. Linus Torvalds wrote a book, so Stallman did, and many others as well.

GNU is the only Operating System, and Linux is one of its many kernels.

Sorry, I’m not religious.

You can read books about it. Linus Torvalds wrote a book, so Stallman did, and many others as well.

I'd like to read "Just for fun" written by Linus real paper book

yup in the vacuum

Oh, okay. That could be. Rhetorical discussions, they’re interesting sometimes.

I'd like to read "Just for fun" written by Linus real paper book

I haven’t read it yet. It’s not an easy book to find.

I haven’t read it yet. It’s not an easy book to find.

? I also have no time

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

Probably because you didn’t need to find a replacement for Corel or similar programs. I learned about it by searching.

? I also have no time

I have some 20’ idle sitting on the train.

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

AlternativeTo is also a website you can try to find Linux alternatives to programs.

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

By having time to look on software/packages catalogs, like yumex (deprecated now), dnfdragora and Gnome Software

Ohh, I also had time for that. Haha...

Stallman is the Open Source

No. Stallman is FSF. Linus Torvalds is Open Source.

Or listen the OS wars parts 1 and 2 from the red hat's podcast "Command-Line heroes"

I still miss yumex

dnfdragora is not good-looking

I wouldn’t call it shit, it was interesting. And if I want to apply to a university I won’t have to study it because I already did.

Shit is more of a figure of speech nowadays. I'm not saying that's it's crap.

dnfdragora is not good-looking

Configure QT themes.

Performance-wise, I feel it could get better too.

dnfdragora is not good-looking

Yeah, and it has its small bugs.

Well, for some reason I end up prefering the command-line to deal with dnf.

Configure QT themes.

It's not because of the theme, it's because it lack some basic controls to customize your panels

But always storing the list of software to choose from in some file to look at it with some editor isn't sooo nice.

Well, for some reason I end up prefering the command-line to deal with dnf.

For updates yes, for searching/installing no. My opinion.

Well, for some reason I end up prefering the command-line to deal with dnf.

Yeah. That's the best. I've never used yumex though, so I can't compare it to dnfdragora

ERROR: S client not available

For updates yes, for searching/installing no. My opinion.

For searching, arguably dnfdragora is nicer... but given that it feels sooo sluggish in comparison... / shrug

Being fair, I'm using dnf search a lot now

dnf search vector | grep draw

dnf search vector | grep draw

use awk or gawk it's better

dnf search vector | gawk '/^vec/{print}'

Yeah, it looks way easier and better

lol

https://www.darktable.org/

awesome tool, thanks for this one ?

I've been looking for an awesome replacement for Lightroom for quite some time

How on earth do you guys know such awesome applications? I mean ... I haven't heard of Krita before read your words.

We search for the proper tools over our time with linux :P

I hate the fact that they list flatpak and repos as separate applications. Just give us an option to choose the source and version.

I have sticker!

Great ?

Hi guys! What's your experience with radeon gpu in fedora? Is the new open source driver a reason worth buying an amd gpu?

I hate the fact that they list flatpak and repos as separate applications. Just give us an option to choose the source and version.

Yeah, they listed same application twice.

Hi guys! What's your experience with radeon gpu in fedora? Is the new open source driver a reason worth buying an amd gpu?

Does super old ATI Radeon count? My old laptop worked wonderfully, and I even gamed on it.

Hi guys! What's your experience with radeon gpu in fedora? Is the new open source driver a reason worth buying an amd gpu?

Yes!

amdgpu is awesome af.

Burn NVidia GPUs.

Nvm, cryptominers are doing so already.

Does super old ATI Radeon count? My old laptop worked wonderfully, and I even gamed on it.

I'm more interested in newer cards, to be honest

I'm more interested in newer cards, to be honest

I have an rx480, worth every penny :3

(before the mining craze)

I'm more interested in newer cards, to be honest

I guess in general, not using NVidia is a plus. Driver-wise.

Looks good

So let's say the cards' priority moves to the background. A good chip is worthless without the proper software to control

I have an rx480, worth every penny :3

now it's impossible to get even a rx 560 at MSRP :(