
Cocoa
04.04.2018
15:29:19
because they have not invaild ocsp and crl
i think GPKIRootCA1 is worst Goverment CA except China
Korea already break Symantec, and they breaking own CA now
Why no difference than past..

Google

Fernando
04.04.2018
15:33:43
anyone here using KDE with Intel graphic drivers?

Nick
04.04.2018
15:35:04

Cocoa
04.04.2018
15:36:34
*.co.kr certificate can MITM google.co.kr(Google Korea)
fucking korea

Allanitomwesh
04.04.2018
15:40:08
Lol

Nick
04.04.2018
15:40:39
I think microsoft dont even care about CA. If I will send them my own self issued one they will most probably accept it XD

Cocoa
04.04.2018
15:45:27
certificates that issued by GPKIRootCA1 or child CA they cannot be revoked by CA
if certificate leaked, CA cannot do anything

Google

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:47:06
While ocsp stapling is becoming a thing though, yes.

Nick
04.04.2018
15:47:36

Cocoa
04.04.2018
15:47:59

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:48:10
Ha
Ha-ha
Ha-ha-ha
Its better this way, ocsp is a massive privacy issue and load balancing problem.
Only OCSP Stapling checks are done by everyone and preferred as the real way to move forward.
ocsp clientside checks are already moving to deprecated.

Nick
04.04.2018
15:48:57
Such compromise is killing me

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:49:02
hi

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:49:05
You get 100% of the safety, optional self-checking and ontop privacy for visitors.

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:49:27
I'm new here. How do you put the foo in the bar?

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:49:45

Nick
04.04.2018
15:49:58

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:50:20
bar.put(foo)
Ah cool. Thank you, it finally started reticulating splines

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:51:25
even CRL?
They should run OCSP servers, yes. But not for users, only for other providers and services to check.

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:52:22
https://1.1.1.1/
cloudflare dns says its fastest

Nick
04.04.2018
15:53:14
funny story about that brand new dns addresses

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:53:49

Google

Nick
04.04.2018
15:53:50
some developers used to use 1.1.1.1 as mock

Cocoa
04.04.2018
15:54:01

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:54:25

Nick
04.04.2018
15:54:50

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:55:01

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:55:30
ah ok

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:56:02

Nick
04.04.2018
15:57:01
Whether dnsmasq is needed in cache or I messed all up on my server XD

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:57:12

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
15:57:22

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:57:26
I run the full unbound that then asks the rootservers to resolve.

Nick
04.04.2018
15:58:03
I did my own adv filter with dnsmasq so it's a bit more complicated
Ended up using Pi-Hole

Tobias?
04.04.2018
15:59:02
DROP china;

Nick
04.04.2018
15:59:14
Hmm

Google

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:00:44
Trough OPNsense because that makes it a shitton easier.

Nick
04.04.2018
16:01:38
how many approaches I didn't even try...
yet

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:01:59

베이직
04.04.2018
16:03:25

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:05:19
well I've changed the DNS from router to 1.0.0.1 and dns lookup took me 17ms, compared to the previous one 40ms, works like a charm

Admin
ERROR: S client not available

Cocoa
04.04.2018
16:06:12

Nick
04.04.2018
16:06:58
Interesting... Whether number of users impact on name resolution... And what actually has an impact

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:07:22
it has DNSSEC

Nick
04.04.2018
16:08:15
All the performance depends on caches on multiple levels of servers if I got it right

베이직
04.04.2018
16:11:17

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:13:00
And DoH
This one https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https-05.txt ?

베이직
04.04.2018
16:13:32

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:14:26
I'm not amazed since it's at Layer 4 in the TCP/IP stack
anyway, the DoH standard is still a draft

Nick
04.04.2018
16:15:17
But what if
Millions of people will switch to 1.1.1.1 or/and 1.0.0.1... it wouldn't be that fast
perhaps

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:15:40
they're pointing to the same addr

Google

Nick
04.04.2018
16:18:39
It would be a shame if one day brand new dns will break down

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:25:04
it's cloudflare man
those are the guys that route DDoS traffic from attacked victims

Uranio-235
04.04.2018
16:28:51
hi there, is posible to enable nautilus samba share in fedora?

Armin
04.04.2018
16:33:53

Uranio-235
04.04.2018
16:34:05
?
how is? I just need to share something with a windows network

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:54:46

Daniel Andrei
04.04.2018
16:54:56
my first code contribution to Ansible got merged
https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/38268

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:55:04
To quickly share files with others simply go into the gnome settings > sharing > File sharing and access it from windows trough davs.
Setting up smb as server will be the most painful thing you'll ever had to configure so far in your life.

Uranio-235
04.04.2018
16:56:11
can windows acccess to a dav server??

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:56:14
And is a huge security risk

Uranio-235
04.04.2018
16:56:29
I guest is dav

Tobias?
04.04.2018
16:56:40
(Change the url to the pc you want)