In the fstab?

and then issue sudo mount /mnt/data

In the fstab?

yes

as new line

Like it?

yep

Saved

You can also use the uuid later but lets check if it works

and then issue sudo mount /mnt/data

^

and then issue sudo mount /mnt/data

Done

sudo chown -R username:username /mnt/data

do that again

And then rightclick in the file manager the mnt/data folder

and see how much space it has free

If you have nautilus you can pull the "data" folder into the left favourite bar now as well.

And then rightclick in the file manager the mnt/data folder

Can’t see

Can’t see

gnome?

Yes

"/"

then mnt

then pull data into your favourites in nautilus

Yeah

Yeah

screenshot?

go one folder abovr

Ok

dragndrop data to + outros locais

a favourite bar should appear

drop it there

It says

Error in copy to /

then go back into data, rightclick and there should be something like "properties"

Alright

Error in copy to /

Nonono, a favourite bar appears when you hover there.

Permissions?

So you have instant access next time.

Oh ok

Permissions?

"free space"

New marker

Like it

Should say 500gb-ish

Yey

Have fun :P

If I want create a virtual machine

Can I use

That space?

That space?

Yes, open virrt-manager, doubleclick the "local computer" option, edit storage and add /mnt/data/virtstuff" as path.

Create the folder before.

Yes, open virrt-manager, doubleclick the "local computer" option, edit storage and add /mnt/data/virtstuff" as path.

(no idea for gnome boxes)

Okay, lets get xfs on there then.

Never heard of XFS. Do you use it only for high-performance I/O or also for archiving?

Yay

I did it

it has larger block maybe...

Why does he suggest that he can use XFS for his removable drives and then talk about using a UPS to protect file integrity? Does removable drives are more prone to unexpected loss of power or "unintentional" removal without unmount? I think he contradicts himself

Never heard of XFS. Do you use it only for high-performance I/O or also for archiving?

Both

For everything really.

Why does he suggest that he can use XFS for his removable drives and then talk about using a UPS to protect file integrity? Does removable drives are more prone to unexpected loss of power or "unintentional" removal without unmount? I think he contradicts himself

I have no idea what LEAP set as mode but xfs is very resilient to hard outages.

Sounds interesting, I’ll try it ??

An UPS is a good idea in all cases tho.

OpenSUSE liked to use btrfs by default...

The best thing about xfs is really (aside performance and co.) its tooling - there are tools to dump: data metadata the entire thing into a file thats only as large as the exact used space (and gzip it) Making up for its inability to downsize.

(zfs da best)

And yes, xfs has live upsizing and offline upsizing but no live or offline downsizing with xfs_dump and xfs_restore from another partition/drive.

(original zfs from solaris)

ERROR: S client not available

perhabs that was unnecessary

Woa

Well, now i'm hungry. But no bread, sauce or frites for me thanks.

OpenSUSE liked to use btrfs by default...

BurningTumpsteRFireSystem, yes.

The maintaienr of xfs calls hdds "spinning rust" ?

BurningTumpsteRFireSystem, yes.

lol is it dead already?

or just "no support"

lol is it dead already?

Suse and facebook love it The entire containerized world, kinda the future, hates it.

or just "no support"

No support for btrfs starting with RHEL 7.4 and coreOS (docker host) since quite some time.

they might have reasons for love...

they might have reasons for love...

It has a ton of nice features, yes. And if it was stable and well coded i'd be all for it.

This is the BTRFS FAQ

FAQ

"So, in general, it is impossible to give an accurate estimate of the amount of free space on any btrfs filesystem. Yes, this sucks." (Emphasis as on the wiki)

Korea goverment crazy

GPKIRootCA1 that is an Certificate Authority managed by Korea Goverment, trusted by Microsoft and Trying to get trust by Mozilla

But that CA issued to *.tld, Not check domain ownership, Invaild OCSP, Invaild CRL

and not following Standard(Multiple CN, DNS:IP, and etc...)

How can I get a list of CA trusted in my system?

GPKIRootCA1 that is an Certificate Authority managed by Korea Goverment, trusted by Microsoft and Trying to get trust by Mozilla

Ha, microsoft....

I think it's not microsoft's bad

How can I get a list of CA trusted in my system?

Don't worry, fedora not trust that

and i think that will can't get trust forever

?

They already failed get trust by mozilla

and now retrying

Fail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1226100

Retry: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1377389