How the command knows I want it aimed to that particular repository online in Github?

How the command knows I want it aimed to that particular repository online in Github?

Aaaah I see. Ok after the bundle update you should commit and push the new Gemlfile.lock

Anyone else experiencing this with newrole ? https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/117135/newrole-not-working-properly/

BTW, Santiago hi there! Welcome to the group

Hi

Aaaah I see. Ok after the bundle update you should commit and push the new Gemlfile.lock

So I need to have something locally installed, right? What do I need?

Hi

Please, read the rules in the pinned message. Thanks.

So I need to have something locally installed, right? What do I need?

You need ruby and the bundler gem which is installed via gem install bundler

And something from git I suppose?

you need git as well to clone and push the modifications

Ah.

You're just going to push the newly updated Gemflile.lock

Looks like a lot of work for a 6 years old project...

My advice

Yes?

just run a ruby Docker container and execute all that crap in there

then remove container

ruby has ALOT of dependencies

Okay. Sounds fine.

What should I install and how does Docker works?

This is as far to my usual fields of knowledge as India from Egypt.

You're on Fedora right?

Yes, I am.

just install the docker package

Ah, okay.

And then?

then create a group docker and usermod -aG docker your_user to add your user to the docker group

Ah.

otherwise you'll have to type sudo all the time when running docker commands

Oh, I see.

And then?

after docker has been configured, proceed pulling and executing a ruby image: docker run --rm -ti ruby:2.4.3-stretch bash You'll end up in a cmd prompt inside the Ruby container [INSIDE_CONTAINER] install git if not installed, and clone your project. issue gem install bundler cd into project dir, and do the previous steps (backup Gemlfile.lock, remove the one from proj. dir. etc.) and finally do the update bundle update. git commit git push exit [LEFT_CONTAINER] job done.

then create a group docker and usermod -aG docker your_user to add your user to the docker group

I recommend to not do this. As it let the user execute all docker commands without being root. Which again leads to a security break down. As docker runs as root and you can escape a container super easy, when you have access to the docker socket. In other words: When you add your user to the docker group it's somewhere between run everything as root and run in normal user mode. Simply add an alias. alias docker="sudo docker"

Guys, sorry to divert the ongoing convo, but I recently found sth called the FZUG repository. What software does it contain, pray?

I recommend to not do this. As it let the user execute all docker commands without being root. Which again leads to a security break down. As docker runs as root and you can escape a container super easy, when you have access to the docker socket. In other words: When you add your user to the docker group it's somewhere between run everything as root and run in normal user mode. Simply add an alias. alias docker="sudo docker"

then why does Docker recommend adding the user to the docker group in the Docker daemon attack surface doc?

then why does Docker recommend adding the user to the docker group in the Docker daemon attack surface doc?

Actually it says: "only trusted users should be allowed to control your Docker daemon" Which I wouldn't say that the regular user is a trusted user. https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/security/#docker-daemon-attack-surface

your user is not a trusted user? then who is lol

your user is not a trusted user? then who is lol

Well, why do you have a password for sudo in interactive accounts.

Well, why do you have a password for sudo in interactive accounts.

For privilege escalation. By default you're unprivileged.

Plus you're adding yourself to the wheel group or sudo when preparing your OS. If you wanna be more catholic than the pope, don't add yourself to the group and avoid privilege escalation. But that System is pretty much useless if you can't do anything lol

For privilege escalation. By default you're unprivileged.

As the docs point out, who has access to the docker socket, is like root. While sudo at least asks for a password, docker won't.

We're talking about a personal PC

not a business one, which changes the situation more.

As the docs point out, who has access to the docker socket, is like root. While sudo at least asks for a password, docker won't.

Plus you can do buffer overflow very easily and escalate to root easily if you want to break into the system that bad.

Plus you can do buffer overflow very easily and escalate to root easily if you want to break into the system that bad.

Well, as I always say, at the end of the day, you can do that you want. But I really wonder since when it's so easy to break into root I wonder who we make it to survive our day to day business. But let's look from it another perspective: Why should your Computer trust an interactive user without a password (which is the important point here)? When you check a default Fedora setup you do this no where. Why? Because interactive accounts may get accessed by stangers when you don't have an eye on your machine and forgot to lock it. So all in all, it's a bad idea. Especially since there is already malware that hides itself in docker containers, it's dangerous. Also it's gets worse because docker has the ability to get itself out of SELinux context checks and this way compromise the entire security infrastructure in Fedora. Please keep this in mind

Well, as I always say, at the end of the day, you can do that you want. But I really wonder since when it's so easy to break into root I wonder who we make it to survive our day to day business. But let's look from it another perspective: Why should your Computer trust an interactive user without a password (which is the important point here)? When you check a default Fedora setup you do this no where. Why? Because interactive accounts may get accessed by stangers when you don't have an eye on your machine and forgot to lock it. So all in all, it's a bad idea. Especially since there is already malware that hides itself in docker containers, it's dangerous. Also it's gets worse because docker has the ability to get itself out of SELinux context checks and this way compromise the entire security infrastructure in Fedora. Please keep this in mind

Ah ok. Thank you for that.

Well, as I always say, at the end of the day, you can do that you want. But I really wonder since when it's so easy to break into root I wonder who we make it to survive our day to day business. But let's look from it another perspective: Why should your Computer trust an interactive user without a password (which is the important point here)? When you check a default Fedora setup you do this no where. Why? Because interactive accounts may get accessed by stangers when you don't have an eye on your machine and forgot to lock it. So all in all, it's a bad idea. Especially since there is already malware that hides itself in docker containers, it's dangerous. Also it's gets worse because docker has the ability to get itself out of SELinux context checks and this way compromise the entire security infrastructure in Fedora. Please keep this in mind

Also sorry for sounding so harsh, but no offence was given, in chat it sounds so aggresive... ?

To be honest, I don't trust any browser benchmarks. And the speed is not such an important thing to me as long as all pages I want to use open within 2 seconds. The rest is up to the end user. I can't really explain why, but I prefer Firefox over Chromium. Maybe there is no real reason but it works fine for me and I'm talking pretty often with Mozilla guys about it. I don't have this spirit with Chromium. Not matter what, both browsers have their goods and bads. For example I install chromium everywhere for JS debugging, etc. But I don't use it for daily browsing.

The best browser is Elinks!?

?

Mainline, hah?

Guys, sorry to divert the ongoing convo, but I recently found sth called the FZUG repository. What software does it contain, pray?

@Wolfshappen ?

@Wolfshappen ?

A lot of propreitary spyware and rpmfusion steals

A lot of propreitary spyware and rpmfusion steals

???

I'd refrain from installing it, especially since chinesium-made.

I'd refrain from installing it, especially since chinesium-made.

Ah okkkk

I need moonplayer...

Hey guys, sorry for trouble you again :D , but does anyone has possobility to login with xorg session with standart nvidia drivers (I have laptop video cards intel + nvidia 960m)? stuck after loggining.

I need moonplayer...

And... mpv doesnt work?

And... mpv doesnt work?

Nah, I like to try new stuff out ..

Nah, I like to try new stuff out ..

Please do not endager yourself by adding weird repos for it tough.

Please do not endager yourself by adding weird repos for it tough.

Yeeee

Aight, thanks for the input!

It'd be nice if Fedora implements the mate- tweaks utility too...

I don't need them, tho.

I don't need them, tho.

Ofc, but like I mentioned, I like some new stuff...

ERROR: S client not available

Ofc, but like I mentioned, I like some new stuff...

With the new option 4 windows split I'm fine.

With the new option 4 windows split I'm fine.

Yeah, I'm looking forward to testing that out too!!!

With the new option 4 windows split I'm fine.

try gtile if you want splitting :3

Or explore the new gnome feature to resize snapped windows and upcoming quarter snap with resizing of other snapped windows

try gtile if you want splitting :3

XTile on non- GNOME desktops...

Or explore the new gnome feature to resize snapped windows and upcoming quarter snap with resizing of other snapped windows

+1

try gtile if you want splitting :3

Now it is native on the new Mate release :3

Hello!! Please read the pinned message!

There's another poll, guys!!!

https://strawpoll.com/gdd2berp

https://strawpoll.com/gdd2berp

No "neither" Option. disappointed. XD

No "neither" Option. disappointed. XD

Eh, it seems to be some kind of elimination challenge...

https://twitter.com/asknoahshow/status/961313613481783296

No "neither" Option. disappointed. XD

Why not KDE Neon, btw???

Why not KDE Neon, btw???

recent, less than stable kde sources bolted ontop of ubuntu and shipped. wouldn't maindesktop.

recent, less than stable kde sources bolted ontop of ubuntu and shipped. wouldn't maindesktop.

Ahhh okkkk... What do you feel about KaOS, Solus and Chakra, btw?

Ahhh okkkk... What do you feel about KaOS, Solus and Chakra, btw?

I'd stop at someone naming their distro close like "Chaos" intentionally.

I'd stop at someone naming their distro close like "Chaos" intentionally.

Fedora Heisenbug :P

New, no community, barely forum help and error discovery so far.

Solus = Budgie = Beta

Oic

Not looking to start flamewars, just wanted your opinion...

Solus = Budgie = Beta

How about GNOME and MATE edition?

How about GNOME and MATE edition?

Is it their main supported DE or has a large community testing and continouusly patching for upstream changes?

Is it their main supported DE or has a large community testing and continouusly patching for upstream changes?

Idk.

Idk.

(kinda rhetorical question) :P

(kinda rhetorical question) :P

Haha, btw, I like budgie as gnome shell replacement.

Solus = Budgie = Beta

Don't let Ikey hear you say that

Haha, btw, I like budgie as gnome shell replacement.

Me too, tbh.. your repos ?

How are you people?