Welcome aboard @ThatAnonymousGuy

Please, read the rules in the pinned message

Welcome aboard @ThatAnonymousGuy

Tnx

welcome :)

Is is okay to install an inkscape extension with deb package on fedora? Is it possible?

Is is okay to install an inkscape extension with deb package on fedora? Is it possible?

It is possible but not recommended

Is is okay to install an inkscape extension with deb package on fedora? Is it possible?

Its highly inadvisable to do so.

You would get no updates, files might be replaced and break later on or immediately and there is no magic toolkit to convert or install them.

You would get no updates, files might be replaced and break later on or immediately and there is no magic toolkit to convert or install them.

Dpkg

Dpkg

Will not work properly with packages not made for fedora.

And again, everything you install this way - zero updates, zero compatibility, compiled against different upstream versions

Will not work properly with packages not made for fedora.

Didn't test it but at most cases you right I guess

And again, everything you install this way - zero updates, zero compatibility, compiled against different upstream versions

Sure

What about if I run a Debian distro on virtual , am I able to work with inkscape smoothly in there? I don't wanna keep it and it's for temporary usage.

Are you guys have any experience on working with graphical software with virtual os?

Are you sure that extension isn't available for Fedora?

I need a accurate and realtime mouse movements

I believe so There is the link comming

https://inkscape.org/en/~pascal.fautrero/%E2%98%85xia

I think I found it.

https://github.com/pfautrero/xia#build-application-everywhere-using-gruntbower

I need to clone this repository and build it

Is installing extension like this gonna be save for fedora? I mean on this level still is risky? It's extension!

<jwf> Hey folks! If you have a StackOverflow account, consider voting up the Fedora community ads for the site! https://meta.superuser.com/questions/12885/community-promotion-ads-2018

<jwf> Errr, SuperUser, not StackOverflow I guess, but same account system

<jwf> These do a lot to help Fedora.

https://mate-desktop.org/blog/2018-02-07-mate-1-20-released/

Sweet, I'm going back to Fedora with Mate on f28. I have never used it on my laptop, this will be the first time.

It just look classic gnome

http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/diff-u-detainting-kernel

Any kernel exploiters here ?

Sweet, I'm going back to Fedora with Mate on f28. I have never used it on my laptop, this will be the first time.

It'd be nice if Fedora implements the mate- tweaks utility too...

It'd be nice if Fedora implements the mate- tweaks utility too...

If I remember correctly the line on that is no. Something about not being really portable and having to actually write it or something like it from scratch instead of porting

If I remember correctly the line on that is no. Something about not being really portable and having to actually write it or something like it from scratch instead of porting

Ohh :(... Any links to discussions on that, if you can find them, please?

Ohh :(... Any links to discussions on that, if you can find them, please?

Right now can't remember any sauce, but I think it was a forum, most likely fedoraforum

Right now can't remember any sauce, but I think it was a forum, most likely fedoraforum

Ahhh Okk, I'll search... Thanks :)

Testing

Testing

Ping!

Ping!

My work wifi sucks

Ah, that's a bummer ?

Ah, that's a bummer ?

Writting am American version of an jappenses myth. I been looking for an publisher..

Writting am American version of an jappenses myth. I been looking for an publisher..

Oh wow! That sounds interesting! I hope it goes well. I'd recommend a publisher to you if I knew one.

Oh wow! That sounds interesting! I hope it goes well. I'd recommend a publisher to you if I knew one.

I'm sending it to an close friend of mine to do an audio of the first 26 pages

morning ☕️

good morning

Hello, all!

good morning

Good morning!

Hello, all!

Heyo!

how are you guys today ?

Doing quite well. Just finishing up some schoolwork and jamming out to some Rapper's Delight ?

How about you?

nice

just having coffee and getting ready to scramble to work

woke up this morning with the sun in my face lol

at least it's better than raining

woke up this morning with the sun in my face lol

Wakey wakey! ?

at least it's better than raining

True. Always a gloomy start imho, even though I like rain

True. Always a gloomy start imho, even though I like rain

yeah! it's a mood breaker

just read something this morning

what's with all this hustle between Opera 51 vs. Firefox Quantum being faster?

Opera was faster even before Firefox Quantum

although it's still chromium

Opera was faster even before Firefox Quantum

Base premise: Mozarella lied on quantum release and presented a customized benchmark they made inspired by a real one that would not benchmark any of mozarellas weak points and instead only the very things it had been massively sped up in at the price of accuracy, then claimed to be faster than chrome in the mozarella "speedometer 2.0" - while still being as slow as ever on the real speedometer Step 2, Opera changes their toolchain to clang, tests in the real speedometer against quantum and finds that they are still 30% ahead, like chromium always was.

Base premise: Mozarella lied on quantum release and presented a customized benchmark they made inspired by a real one that would not benchmark any of mozarellas weak points and instead only the very things it had been massively sped up in at the price of accuracy, then claimed to be faster than chrome in the mozarella "speedometer 2.0" - while still being as slow as ever on the real speedometer Step 2, Opera changes their toolchain to clang, tests in the real speedometer against quantum and finds that they are still 30% ahead, like chromium always was.

Ohhhh I get it now

ERROR: S client not available

It becomes even better when you realize that almost every benchmark including these are nonsense when it comes to real web performance :D

Faking speed tests just to prove X is better than Y

It becomes even better when you realize that almost every benchmark including these are nonsense when it comes to real web performance :D

Yep, except the real speedometer.

It has 420 full: dom reloads, dom manipulations, todo list checking and more in the 6 current most used web frameworks.

only downside for Opera is the multimedia support

but it doesn't bother me that videos don't work on Facebook

Its the only benchmark that chromium even considers to be real world anymore, together with the motionmark (where a gpu blacklist overriden chromium will just hammer stylo, the new quantum css engine to be so much faster, into submission)

To be honest, I don't trust any browser benchmarks. And the speed is not such an important thing to me as long as all pages I want to use open within 2 seconds. The rest is up to the end user. I can't really explain why, but I prefer Firefox over Chromium. Maybe there is no real reason but it works fine for me and I'm talking pretty often with Mozilla guys about it. I don't have this spirit with Chromium. Not matter what, both browsers have their goods and bads. For example I install chromium everywhere for JS debugging, etc. But I don't use it for daily browsing.

For me I want Firefox nightly but can't find the install instructions

For me I want Firefox nightly but can't find the install instructions

Download tar, unpack it into your home folder, doubleclick the firefox icon

For me I want Firefox nightly but can't find the install instructions

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/all/ download, unpack, use.

To be honest, I don't trust any browser benchmarks. And the speed is not such an important thing to me as long as all pages I want to use open within 2 seconds. The rest is up to the end user. I can't really explain why, but I prefer Firefox over Chromium. Maybe there is no real reason but it works fine for me and I'm talking pretty often with Mozilla guys about it. I don't have this spirit with Chromium. Not matter what, both browsers have their goods and bads. For example I install chromium everywhere for JS debugging, etc. But I don't use it for daily browsing.

Pretty much, but i want my x230 to last the longest on its battery and to use the most secure things around - and sadly firefox can compete in neither.

Plus i have to set a ton of user_prefs to make it truly private, unlike chromium where its just some clicks.

Pretty much, but i want my x230 to last the longest on its battery and to use the most secure things around - and sadly firefox can compete in neither.

I have a battery life of more than 10 hours even with firefox and Gnome driving things crazy (actually Gnome is worse than FF)

I have a battery life of more than 10 hours even with firefox and Gnome driving things crazy (actually Gnome is worse than FF)

Roughly same for light browsing

To be honest, I don't trust any browser benchmarks. And the speed is not such an important thing to me as long as all pages I want to use open within 2 seconds. The rest is up to the end user. I can't really explain why, but I prefer Firefox over Chromium. Maybe there is no real reason but it works fine for me and I'm talking pretty often with Mozilla guys about it. I don't have this spirit with Chromium. Not matter what, both browsers have their goods and bads. For example I install chromium everywhere for JS debugging, etc. But I don't use it for daily browsing.

I agree with this.

It beats out our companys macbooks. XD

Roughly same for light browsing

I wouldn't say I'm a light browsing person xD

I wouldn't say I'm a light browsing person xD

Light as in "20 tabs, two of which are youtube music/videos" xD

is Chrome still eating all the RAM? since last update

I have a battery life of more than 10 hours even with firefox and Gnome driving things crazy (actually Gnome is worse than FF)

I don't know how you do but I can't stand McGnome

Light as in "20 tabs, two of which are youtube music/videos" xD

That's my kind of light :P

Slow and power hungry

is Chrome still eating all the RAM? since last update

It never did. Its using that ram to make webpages and the browsing experience for yourself better All ram it uses is marked as swappable and will be releaser when anything else needs it.

It never did. Its using that ram to make webpages and the browsing experience for yourself better All ram it uses is marked as swappable and will be releaser when anything else needs it.

Yeah, free RAM Is wasted RAM, if only firefox did the same

Browsers srealing ram is one of the biggest bullshit things ever because you want them to "eat" that ram.

It never did. Its using that ram to make webpages and the browsing experience for yourself better All ram it uses is marked as swappable and will be releaser when anything else needs it.

Last time I checked my RAM didn't switch to swap when I was using chrome, swap was 0

Last time I checked my RAM didn't switch to swap when I was using chrome, swap was 0

It swaps when needed

IMHO browsers eating RAM is the result of "web developers" having 16GB RAM machines and developing their code without any optimization

Unless another program demands it there is no need or reason to swap it.