Is there not an nvidia driver package for Fedora?

Okay, Imma reboot into arch until I can figure this stuff out

One thing I gotta say about Fedora tho

The search utility is great

Is there not an nvidia driver package for Fedora?

not in the main repos

rpmfusion has some

there was an entry in fedora wiki for bumblebee also

I have rpmfusion, but there are things like development libraries, and modprobe tools and xconfig, but not the actual driver

yeah i noticed that installing proprietary nvidia requires many development packages

Yeah. Can someone point me to a guide on how to create fedora RPMs? Maybe if it's as easy as the pkgbuild, I can just create a package for it and host the repo somewhere

I'm using xorg still because of i3wm.

Have you tryied swam? ( i don't remember if we have already talked about it )

But for now wayland is completely broken

Wayland is not completely broken

Hello folks, I'm trying to update, translate and redesign this app. I contributed to it years ago and decided to start it over now. I'm fairly ignorant about Github, so would anyone lend me hand? The code is here: https://github.com/Lailah

Wew u r spanish and live in germany?

Wait, is it? I never heard a complaint about them until now

Well, I had to deal with them and it was certainly difficult. But I only tried Fedora and Debian, maybe Windows or another distro work better. Or it was just bad luck.

Wew u r spanish and live in germany?

I’m not Spanish. I never been in Spain in my life.

Wayland is not completely broken

it was designed by a blind man

it was designed by a blind man

We understand where you stand re: wayland, but personal insults towards the devs doesn't help at all. File bug reports, test it, find errors, and you'll have a stable product sooner than you think :).

Or ofc, you have the option of not using it at all.

We understand where you stand re: wayland, but personal insults towards the devs doesn't help at all. File bug reports, test it, find errors, and you'll have a stable product sooner than you think :).

The error is wayland. Need rm -rf ./wayland-src

Have you tryied swam? ( i don't remember if we have already talked about it )

Sway, isn't it? (Typo)

Jaja yep

The error is wayland. Need rm -rf ./wayland-src

Like I said, feel free to not use it. No need to bad mouth devs who work for free, and don't expect monetary compensation, either.

Also, @vbextreme did you file bug reports?

I’m not Spanish. I never been in Spain in my life.

What then

Yeah. Can someone point me to a guide on how to create fedora RPMs? Maybe if it's as easy as the pkgbuild, I can just create a package for it and host the repo somewhere

This seems to be a question for the Fedora packagers group, have you tried asking there?

Lemme try

What then

What what?

What what?

He means where are you from?

Like I said, feel free to not use it. No need to bad mouth devs who work for free, and don't expect monetary compensation, either.

software is horrible whether it's open, closed, paid or not.

Uh. And why does it matter?

What what?

Which country

Uh. And why does it matter?

Just generally interested. Saw spanish and hence asking

software is horrible whether it's open, closed, paid or not.

Did you file bug reports? Tbh, we don't need that kind of attitude in here.

Is there not an nvidia driver package for Fedora?

rpmfusion-nonfree.

The greyed outcommented repo in my installer

Also, @vbextreme did you file bug reports?

I have open a bug report, Securities bug report. Wayland not handle multiple session, but user can execute multiple compositor. Thank's dbus you can execute application from session A and view on session B without any kind of privileges. You can try yourself: Start fedora gnome Enter in new console Execute sway Start gnome-terminal from sway and with magicial appared in gnome session. But isn't real problems, wayland has more serious structural problems

rpmfusion-nonfree.

I have it

I have it

Then you should be able to install nvidia right away

I have open a bug report, Securities bug report. Wayland not handle multiple session, but user can execute multiple compositor. Thank's dbus you can execute application from session A and view on session B without any kind of privileges. You can try yourself: Start fedora gnome Enter in new console Execute sway Start gnome-terminal from sway and with magicial appared in gnome session. But isn't real problems, wayland has more serious structural problems

You've filed bug reports, right? on the structural problems too? Good, wait for the devs to act on them. Calling them blind people on telegram groups doesn't help.

Which package tho? Lemme create chroot and show you the search result

I have open a bug report, Securities bug report. Wayland not handle multiple session, but user can execute multiple compositor. Thank's dbus you can execute application from session A and view on session B without any kind of privileges. You can try yourself: Start fedora gnome Enter in new console Execute sway Start gnome-terminal from sway and with magicial appared in gnome session. But isn't real problems, wayland has more serious structural problems

Oh no, a user can login to another tty and get a gnome session running there instead when hes authenticated.

Sounds almost like this has zero security impact

Which package tho? Lemme create chroot and show you the search result

https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/NVIDIA

You've filed bug reports, right? on the structural problems too? Good, wait for the devs to act on them. Calling them blind people on telegram groups doesn't help.

Yes I have open bug.

xorg-x11-drv-nvidia akmod-nvidia

You've filed bug reports, right? on the structural problems too? Good, wait for the devs to act on them. Calling them blind people on telegram groups doesn't help.

If a user as himself with wayland session opens his session elswhere, as intended for future remote desktop, i see zero impact tough.

It'd be a flaw if another user or guest could take over the original session.

Sounds almost like this has zero security impact

So, if you have two active console, I can open a window (in style systemd password) on gnome session, request you a password and good bye

In xorg you can't

So, if you have two active console, I can open a window (in style systemd password) on gnome session, request you a password and good bye

If you have that amount of control over a wiping it makes no difference.

If a user as himself with wayland session opens his session elswhere, as intended for future remote desktop, i see zero impact tough.

I'm actually concerned about his hatred and attitude toward the devs...

In xorg you can't

Right, in xorg you can just record the entire screen and run as program anyway.

So, if you have two active console, I can open a window (in style systemd password) on gnome session, request you a password and good bye

Does that work as guest or different user

If you need to be logged in for that user first its no impact.

Hello

If you need to be logged in for that user first its no impact.

Yes

Isn't a big problems, but not handle a session is problems

Not have any kind of standard is very problems

Isn't a big problems, but not handle a session is problems

Again, if you can spawn your session if you are logged in it'd be more of a future feature for remote desktop.

Not have any kind of standard is very problems

Wayland is the standard tough.

Again, if you can spawn your session if you are logged in it'd be more of a future feature for remote desktop.

Remote desktop is not standard

Remote desktop is not standard

There needs to be an interface for it in wayland tough.

Wayland is the standard tough.

Not standard for screencast

ERROR: S client not available

So only select applications can access it.

This is in the works already.

Not standard for nothing

Only workaround for run xorg applications

Not standard for screencast

That one is already builtin.

Only workaround for run xorg applications

That will not change. unless the applications start to support wayland.

But Xwayland works pretty well.

But Xwayland works pretty well.

Not very well but isn't problems

That will not change. unless the applications start to support wayland.

If you want applications you need a true standard, same xorg, not a protocols that depending on compositor

If you want applications you need a true standard, same xorg, not a protocols that depending on compositor

Xorg is old, it's been around since the what, 90s? Don't we need newer standards?

Oh yes, I like innovation. I have installed fedora for test wayland

Oh yes, I like innovation. I have installed fedora for test wayland

Good! File bugs, attempt to join mailing lists, talk to devs, etc. That's helpful, but calling him blind, and bad mouthing wayland is not. :)

Good! File bugs, attempt to join mailing lists, talk to devs, etc. That's helpful, but calling him blind, and bad mouthing wayland is not. :)

I think the developers would not be happy with one rm -rf I'm talking about the structure only, the one that brought with it wayland is interesting

That one is already builtin.

Link?

Pardon?

I was replying to message which was later deleted, it was offensive.

I think the only additions were don't give intentionally bad advice and don't post illegal things. ?

Huh, it's included in "be nice" ? btw couldn't recognize you without the hat..?

I was replying to message which was later deleted, it was offensive.

Oh aights...

Have you tryied swam? ( i don't remember if we have already talked about it )

Someone has mentioned Sway to me before, but I don't know if it's a perfect, drop-in replacement yet. I remember a lot of features missing the last time I looked at it. Or if it wasn't missing features, it was major configuration changes. I also don't know if it's packaged for Fedora yet, but I also haven't looked.

Yes, it is packed

Oh, awesome. I may play with it then, but I'll need to explore how much work I need to do to move things.

Bought a hard disk on the Western Digital store... And It ships from Netherlands ????

can fedora hits 0.5 $

can fedora hits 0.5 $

Fedora is a cryptocurrency now?

Fedora is a cryptocurrency now?

Lol

btw you cryptoboys should buy stocks. Not saying I do... but you should.

Lol

Funny thing is, I'm not surprised there's yet another Bitcoin clone out there and that it is indeed named Fedora

Speaking of Bitcoin clones, or rather non-clones, how about that Ethereum? What the hell is it good for? The first "autonomous organization" was a complete disaster resulting in multi-millions of dollars in theft because of a very small error.

Speaking of Bitcoin clones, or rather non-clones, how about that Ethereum? What the hell is it good for? The first "autonomous organization" was a complete disaster resulting in multi-millions of dollars in theft because of a very small error.

There are many clones of bitcoins.. :/

U have a ice propic sis..

U have a ice propic sis..

Haha, thanks :) and I'm male btw

Haha, thanks :) and I'm male btw

?