Lol wat

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/telegram-desktop-git/

No versioning, thus no checksum checks, hard dependency on openssl 1.0, and looks heaps more complicated than the spec.

I stick with RHEL/CentOS/Fedora.

I'll take RHEL And Fedora :P

No versioning, thus no checksum checks, hard dependency on openssl 1.0, and looks heaps more complicated than the spec.

Check the PKGBUILD

Huh?

Company, Contracts and using arch is like saying i want to pack my stuff and leave. Same for gentoo or anything that isnt either redhat or has better commercial support.

Check the PKGBUILD

I did

Company, Contracts and using arch is like saying i want to pack my stuff and leave. Same for gentoo or anything that isnt either redhat or has better commercial support.

But whyyy

But whyyy

Because we get paid that stuff doesnt break, thus the requirements put in place so we can tell customers their stuff will very likely not break.

But whyyy

You don't use arch in a production environment

It's a very bad idea

For your own machine? Sure

Because we get paid that stuff doesnt break, thus the requirements put in place so we can tell customers their stuff will very likely not break.

But you can use it on your workstation?

You don't use arch in a production environment

+1

And unlike arch, with unstable builds, unstable pkbuilds that dont get maintained or might be DCMA'd someday ...

You don't use arch in a production environment

Of course not

But you can use it on your workstation?

Yeah, that's what I was asking

But you can use it on your workstation?

No, Fedora too. Not that i'd have an intention to switch.

But you can use it on your workstation?

Not if he has to build things for a certain client

I had seen to many problems on arch that on the exact same version of libs on Fedora never happened.

I thought he was saying that he is not allows to use arch on his workstation

Even on others, just today with someone's A2DP not working.

I use arch at work so yeah...

I thought he was saying that he is not allows to use arch on his workstation

I am not allowed to.

I thought he was saying that he is not allows to use arch on his workstation

He's not

Lol

And unlike arch, with unstable builds, unstable pkbuilds that dont get maintained or might be DCMA'd someday ...

I love this. Laughing so hard because this hits so close to home

Truth is

Not if he has to build things for a certain client

BuildENV is jenkins, but i have to be able to login at any second.

Every arch user is just doing it because we love it when shit breaks and we learn so much from it

Or at least I am

If my pc is stuck because -SyU broke something i get every minute deducted from my pay.

BuildENV is jenkins, but i have to be able to login at any second.

So windows is also not allowed

Also, the AUR is community

So windows is also not allowed

Not for me, yes. :3

I don't have shit break /shrug

Not for me, yes. :3

Great

Also, the AUR is community

Not official

Packages.archlinux.org

Also, the AUR is community

Same for rpmfusion.

because else fedora could be sued over media licenses.

Would have raged out if you said you are allowed to use windows

I'm not familiar with rpmfusion. Lemme Google what it is

https://rpmfusion.org/FAQ#What_is_RPM_Fusion.3F

So Rpm fusion is just community mentioned repository of packages?

So Rpm fusion is just community mentioned repository of packages?

One with a lot of oversight and strict guidelines.

How do you create a package for rpmfusion?

Something the AUR should strive to be more imho.

Something the AUR should strive to be more imho.

True

I admit that

But

Something the AUR should strive to be more imho.

It's both a blessing and a curse

How do you create a package for rpmfusion?

You make a spec, notify the admins in IRC or another way and let them confirm you dont pull binaries/do shady stuff.

ask xvitaly if you want to know more.

The fact that it's so unregulated means that it can have a huge number of packages.

It's a sacrifice of stability for quantity

The fact that it's so unregulated means that it can have a huge number of packages.

44004 To be exact

48 Trusted users and 49956 Registered

The fact that it's so unregulated means that it can have a huge number of packages.

That can be sued out of existence tomorrow. I dont want that to happen when i manage several hundred servers.

And that's your choice

But all this, everything, has been said before.

Just search this chat for "AUR"

That can be sued out of existence tomorrow. I dont want that to happen when i manage several hundred servers.

Yeah. That's why arch isn't in production anywhere

Everyone is painfully aware of that

But it's kinda awesome that it even exists

telegram-desktop-dev just got updated :P

ERROR: S client not available

Like, literally seconds ago

Haha.

Yeah, and since it's so easy to make PKGBUILDs, updates roll out quick

Yeah, and since it's so easy to make PKGBUILDs, updates roll out quick

Unless you're the discord-canary maintainer

in which case you're slow as shit

And should probably give the package name to discord-always-canary

Yeah, and since it's so easy to make PKGBUILDs, updates roll out quick

I'll stick to rock stability. Rhel and centos on servers, fedora for workstations.

Okay

And fedora on my own servers so i know what'll change in 5 years in rhel/to get a taste of THE FUTURE.

Yeah, that I will give you

Like php-fpm by default since F27 and painless config transition trough dnf.

Arch cannot do that. We're not nearly organized enough

I wonder which is less efficient

Hint, the one that requires manually updating the pkgbuild

That can be sued out of existence tomorrow. I dont want that to happen when i manage several hundred servers.

The actual packages are mostly downloaded directly from their sources and then converted/installed/whatever

If my pc is stuck because -SyU broke something i get every minute deducted from my pay.

What

What

Yeah for the same reason he is not allowed to use windows

Do you get paid per hour??

Because it can break anytime

Windows is worse tho

Do you get paid per hour??

That too and 50% extra overtime. But no, if i cant react to a client because pc problems i (pac update) caused its my pay on the line.

Yeah, I was wondering. Is linking to copyrighted content/software a violation?

That too and 50% extra overtime. But no, if i cant react to a client because pc problems i (pac update) caused its my pay on the line.

What if your redhat or so has a problem

Like downloading a file with links to the mp3 codec

What if your redhat or so has a problem

It doesn't.

Yeah, I was wondering. Is linking to copyrighted content/software a violation?

spotify/intellij paid versions are

It doesn't.

What if

spotify/intellij paid versions are

You are paying for the license not for the product

You can download it anytime from the official site