mailga has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

jkurik has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

jkurik has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

what's this…?

jkurik has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

what's this... (2)

Those are people joining IRC channel connected with this group.

?

don't want to be the naysayer, but it's certainly not the first time someone tries this... :D

Sure

1'5 millions is not enough IMHO

let use be optimistic

https://scontent-waw1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/22289940_2007745962585637_6011460798425330482_o.jpg?oh=74ff1d8738c47cd6f7aa1aa64272b305&oe=5A4287D1

I wish it would succeed!

mee too although it hard , let us belive in them

and also having Anbox in Fedora would mean we could load Android apps, too

That doesn't work well. Blackberry 10 had it, but native performance was 100x better. Also, as porting apps was possible, most developers did this instead of building native. So, I feel porting should not be an official option. No one can stop anyone from doing this. But, we shouldn't make it top easy.

*too easy.

That doesn't work well. Blackberry 10 had it, but native performance was 100x better. Also, as porting apps was possible, most developers did this instead of building native. So, I feel porting should not be an official option. No one can stop anyone from doing this. But, we shouldn't make it top easy.

shouldn't porting apps should be a preffered option?

who can I imagain Fedora with gnome on smart phone

it's will look diff

harish has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

Librem 5! :D

I'd like a funcion just like Microsoft Continuum or Samsung Dex, it would be lovely! ?

shouldn't porting apps should be a preffered option?

Like I said, if we add a full/partial Android runtime, app devs will get lazy and just port over the android app instead of making a completely native one. Maybe my usage of the word Port was wrong, but I meant just making the android app compatible with the runtime.

Like I said, if we add a full/partial Android runtime, app devs will get lazy and just port over the android app instead of making a completely native one. Maybe my usage of the word Port was wrong, but I meant just making the android app compatible with the runtime.

ah yeah, I see, I understood is as native ports. On the other hand, we have similar problem with wine for some time now, and we get native versions of applications even though "Linux version as .exe+wine" is a thing

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1406647

Vote now before Firefox finally throws the very last reason to use it out of the window - your privacy.

Is it possible to uninstall .net update in windows?

Any idea?

Is it possible to uninstall .net update in windows?

While not relevant to this chat, yes.

Just get the newest .net installer and execute it

Vote now before Firefox finally throws the very last reason to use it out of the window - your privacy.

The feature is neither new, nor a actual privacy problem, because (when you read the source code) it's not possible to generate personalized profiles with these information. The idea is to replace the current automated suggesstion that are generated by the search engine you selected which CAN generate these personalized profiles because there is no Gateway or removal barrier inbetween. And it's enabled by default. So yes, Cliqz has a bad reputation but apart from this, this change is nothing that lowers your privacy.

how to find all broken hard links

in what?

Just get the newest .net installer and execute it

Thanks

in what?

~/Downloads

define broken please

just no more hard links or bad paths

they lead to nowhere

Hardlinks? They always point to a file

Softlink can break, since they only lead to a path

The feature is neither new, nor a actual privacy problem, because (when you read the source code) it's not possible to generate personalized profiles with these information. The idea is to replace the current automated suggesstion that are generated by the search engine you selected which CAN generate these personalized profiles because there is no Gateway or removal barrier inbetween. And it's enabled by default. So yes, Cliqz has a bad reputation but apart from this, this change is nothing that lowers your privacy.

Generously wrong to say the least. It comes with the "Human web" enabled by default and how well privacy works with anonimyzed data may be in your memeory from the WoT debacle.

Human Web: Everything you type into the Search Bar All Urls you visit Mouse Movement Amount per page Duration of visit

And even with the source code open they could abuse this (especially ip-url/search relations) and with burda behind it its a matter of when, not if.

haha sources files were removed and broken links are left, so i need to find them all and remove

0/ sombody uses http://swaywm.org/ ?

0/ sombody uses http://swaywm.org/ ?

I tried some time ago, was very interesting but I found it very rough around the edges to the point where I've decided it's not worth it

yep i've tried it last year and it freeze the machine -.-

yep i've tried it last year and it freeze the machine -.-

I tried it two months ago and it didn't freeze, but still there were too many strange quirks to use it daily

I even started wondering if Wayland, by giving more responsibility to the window manager/compositor, didn't raise the bar higher so now there won't be hundreds of window managers anymore, only the biggest players as it will be harder to write one

I thought that with wayland it would be all simpler :P

to do not run WM/DE as root is really nice

I thought that with wayland it would be all simpler :P

overall architecture is simpler, but more responsibility is shifted on the compositor/window manager ;) at least that's how I understand it, but I'm not an expert in this area

Hey, has anyone got a second to help me install a program?

Hey, has anyone got a second to help me install a program?

dnf install <app>

Nah it's a bz2

Jimmie Russell: I've downloaded the .bz2 file and extracted it then gone into terminal and cd'ed into the directory containing the extracted folder But I'm drawing a blank on what my next command should be, I can start the application with ./application but i can't save it into my favourites dock so I'm assuming it's not fully installed rather just running I've tried make and configure but no dice The ls picture will follow this message

Extract the file to /opt or ~/firefox directory sudo tar -jxvf firefox.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 -C /opt or tar -jxvf firefox.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 -C ~/firefox

Basically you just need to unzip the file and create a shortcut to the executable in the menu or desktop.

Ah! That makes sense. Thanks alot for that man, I definitely won't be forgetting those commands haha

or...u can get the source files from Mozilla's ftp.

https://developer.mozilla.org/pt-BR/docs/Developer_Guide/Codigo_Fonte/Downloading_Source_Archives

Is that link just for official Mozilla or other Firefox forks too? The one I just downloaded was waterfox because I'm trying to migrate over

Interesting all the same though

ERROR: S client not available

Is that link just for official Mozilla or other Firefox forks too? The one I just downloaded was waterfox because I'm trying to migrate over

https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox

Sound man

clone the repo and compile the code

harish has joined #fedora-telegram channel.

Can someone disable this join-spam?

https://github.com/MrAlex94/Waterfox

I knew mozilla would make the internet worse by disabling the old addons. Now they drive everybody to old insecure and featureupdate-free forks.

And nobody can wait or search replacements for old addons or use firefox-esr until most devs have fixed their things.

I was more worried about this https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace/comments/74nne8/mozilla_ships_cliqz_for_1_of_new_installs_in/

I was more worried about this https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace/comments/74nne8/mozilla_ships_cliqz_for_1_of_new_installs_in/

You can disable that by hand or switch to aBrowser which is the latest firefox sans tracking and closed source blobs

Or just use chromium as by now it collects less data

You can disable that by hand or switch to aBrowser which is the latest firefox sans tracking and closed source blobs

Yeah but it's like justifying being in an abusive relationship lol Once a company does something shady like that on the dl I usually look for alternatives In downloading waterfox now to try it out and if I don't like it I might just use icecat :)

Yeah but it's like justifying being in an abusive relationship lol Once a company does something shady like that on the dl I usually look for alternatives In downloading waterfox now to try it out and if I don't like it I might just use icecat :)

Why? What's wrong with Firefox?

Why? What's wrong with Firefox?

They are pushing out an addon that will collect all your data to german users soon

@Feir_Cousat The thing you need to get it into the favorites bar is .desktop file.

I mean they have lost my trust with pocket/social api before. But that - i will not install it for relatives anymore. Chromium now.

They are pushing out an addon that will collect all your data to german users soon

What for? What is the purpose?

What for? What is the purpose?

"Better Search"

I mean they have lost my trust with pocket/social api before. But that - i will not install it for relatives anymore. Chromium now.

Not sure if Chromium is much better even with this. ?

"Better Search"

Meh.

Meh.

https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/74yo19/cliqz_and_mozilla_as_i_understand_it_and_metadrama/

Isn't there any way to disable it?

Not sure if Chromium is much better even with this. ?

By default it doesnt log every site i search and url prediction is easily turned off.

And with the preloaded adblocker it might be more privacy oriented than firefox soon, which is amazing and horrible.

Isn't there any way to disable it?

Its opt-out by default. Sure techsavvy users will just shrug and be annoyed but think of where ff is mostly used in germany - privacy aware users that 50% of the time have no technical background or got it installed by a techy family member.

And those now have to gamble and hope grandma isnt in the rollout lottery winners.

Its opt-out by default. Sure techsavvy users will just shrug and be annoyed but think of where ff is mostly used in germany - privacy aware users that 50% of the time have no technical background or got it installed by a techy family member.

So there’s a way to disable it in Settings...?

So there’s a way to disable it in Settings...?

no, uninstalling the addon.

Oh

I didn’t know it’s possible to uninstall the addon.

I didn’t know it’s possible to uninstall the addon.

It doesnt matter. opt-out, default-enabled privacy violation of the worst kind.

In Firefox.

Thats a slap to the face harder than ever before, even pocket.

It doesnt matter. opt-out, default-enabled privacy violation of the worst kind.

I didn’t say it matters. I mean, I completely agree with you. Just saying that I thought I couldn’t uninstall the addon.