sudo dnf install libpgn12 must solve the problem ??

# dnf install libpng12 Última verificação de data de vencimento de metadados: 2:58:28 atrás em Fri Jul 1 12:38:10 2016. Pacote libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.x86_64 já está instalado, ignorando. Dependências resolvidas. Nada para fazer. Concluído!

but don't work

# dnf install libpng12 Última verificação de data de vencimento de metadados: 2:58:28 atrás em Fri Jul 1 12:38:10 2016. Pacote libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.x86_64 já está instalado, ignorando. Dependências resolvidas. Nada para fazer. Concluído!

Wait a moment, let me try it.

# dnf install libpng12 Última verificação de data de vencimento de metadados: 2:58:28 atrás em Fri Jul 1 12:38:10 2016. Pacote libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.x86_64 já está instalado, ignorando. Dependências resolvidas. Nada para fazer. Concluído!

is it possible that this software you are trying to run is a 32 bit version of it? try installing the 32 bit version of the library as well

is it possible that this software you are trying to run is a 32 bit version of it? try installing the 32 bit version of the library as well

Uh, right.

sudo dnf install libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.i686

is it possible that this software you are trying to run is a 32 bit version of it? try installing the 32 bit version of the library as well

wait a moment, I'll try

sudo dnf install libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.amd64 for the x64 ?

sudo dnf install libpng12-1.2.56-2.fc24.i686

It's work

good! have fun ;)

good! have fun ;)

tank you

IMO, Flatpak is the Windows way of software distribution. This will encourage bad practices in upstreams. Bundled libraries are really, really bad for a number of reasons... I just hope developers do not abuse the use this tool.

Eduardo I absolutely agree just bloated packages

Anybody had any success installing Google Earth? I get this: [0702/143322:ERROR:net_util.cc(2195)] Not implemented reached in bool net::HaveOnlyLoopbackAddresses() [0702/143322:ERROR:nss_ocsp.cc(581)] No URLRequestContext for OCSP handler. Is there another solution to see KML files in 3D?

I'm the only one who has trouble to install texstudio?

I mean, in fedora 24

I don't think, it just doesn't start

I even tried to write texstudio and launch it on the terminal... but nothing :(

Samuele have you seen if selinux doesn't allow the app to start

no, I'm new to fedora and I was used to Ubuntu. What I have to do?

I opened Selinux resolusion problem. It seems tha it has blocked "accounts-daemon"

I don't think it was referring to the opening of texstudio

I don't think it was referring to the opening of texstudio

what output does the terminal give when you run 'texstudio' ? Does it sit there thinking about life? Or does it drop back to command line as though it had finished

weird, is anyone able to use google drive integration with nautilus on fc24 ?

not looking at gnome-documents

It drop back to command line as though it had finished. This is the output: "[samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ texstudio [samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ "

weird, is anyone able to use google drive integration with nautilus on fc24 ?

I can use the nautilus integration.

It drop back to command line as though it had finished. This is the output: "[samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ texstudio [samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ "

Weird, maybe some unspecified exception? I assume you've tried dnf remove and reinstall

or dnf remove, then dnf update, then dnf install again

I'm not on 24 or I'd test it out myself ?, I've not had chance to upgrade yet I'm still on 23

if all that fails, try dnf downgrade? Dunno if there will be an older version on the F24 repos though heh

if all that fails, try dnf downgrade? Dunno if there will be an older version on the F24 repos though heh

I have tried all the thing that you mentioned

I have tried all the thing that you mentioned

hmmmm, did you try uninstalling it and then installing from the RPM on the texstudio site?

failing that the only thing I could think of to try is to compile from source

oh! Or you could try using their AppImage, I think that bundles its deps.

hmmmm, did you try uninstalling it and then installing from the RPM on the texstudio site?

The rpm doesn't support fedora24. I haven't seen the appimage in their site. Where I can find it? Is it trusted?

The rpm doesn't support fedora24. I haven't seen the appimage in their site. Where I can find it? Is it trusted?

I'd try the F23 RPM, the Appimage is further down their downloads page. As is the source if you want to try and compile it instead.

I'll try the appimage

It drop back to command line as though it had finished. This is the output: "[samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ texstudio [samuele@cli245-22 ~]$ "

Use texlive

e.g. editor latexila

the appimage doesn't work. Fedora23 rpm on their site works. :)

Use texlive

This is not a real solution. I'm used to texstudio and I like it because it's developed by a community and it is cross-platform. It's also what my friend use, so if I need some help with the editor it would be more difficult.

Thanks everybody for the answer! I'm able to use fedora as my Os thanks of your help! :D

the appimage doesn't work. Fedora23 rpm on their site works. :)

Glad you found a working version :)

This is not a real solution. I'm used to texstudio and I like it because it's developed by a community and it is cross-platform. It's also what my friend use, so if I need some help with the editor it would be more difficult.

A local fedora contributor here at .ni has wrote post about using the official iso image from ctan on a fedora install, although this example uses archlinux, IIRC there is a post about how to do the same setup on fedora: https://teoten.wordpress.com/2016/03/13/texlive-2015-en-manjaro-kile/

weird, is anyone able to use google drive integration with nautilus on fc24 ?

Yes

Yes

Hmm, time to sit down and find why this ain't working for me.

Hmm, time to sit down and find why this ain't working for me.

nm, had to install gvfs-goa package

Hmm, time to sit down and find why this ain't working for me.

Is it on a new installation or upgraded installation ?

Hello Friends

Hello Friends

Hello Mateus :)

:)

Hello Friends

Hello

Is it on a new installation or upgraded installation ?

Fc22 -> fc24 migration

Hello @Mateusmar2

Fc22 -> fc24 migration

Okay, create a new user, login, and add a google account and try google drive again

what do you think of the slackware?

what do you think of the slackware?

it's great, but dated, nowadays you'd go with gentoo or arch if you want something more hands-on

it's great, but dated, nowadays you'd go with gentoo or arch if you want something more hands-on

what's the difference ? It is that I would like to learn more, and it would drive me even more for those who do not have terminal sympathetically yet, but what is the difference and the slackware gentoo? I want to learn more about one of them before migrating to the BSD's

what's the difference ? It is that I would like to learn more, and it would drive me even more for those who do not have terminal sympathetically yet, but what is the difference and the slackware gentoo? I want to learn more about one of them before migrating to the BSD's

ok, so BSD is said to be closer to slackware, but if you want BSD you have to go BSD (freebsd?)

freebsd is the bigger distro, openbsd is aimed at security and quality, netbsd at portability

you can also run debian with kfreebsd kernel

ERROR: S client not available

what do you think of the slackware?

Great if you want to learn Linux, but not for daily use (likewise for Arch and Gentoo). I speak for myself, of course, before people throw insults at me.

gentoo is just very configurable and it has some unique features: slots, use flags

so if you want to be extremely configurable and compiler-optimized, gentoo is for you

if you want to be optimized and missing out some compiler tricks then arch (arch also lacks SLOTS and USE flags)

slackware has a strictly weaker package system and will not by default reload dependencies

Chrome OS is based on gentoo, BTW

Chrome OS is based on gentoo, BTW

Yet. It is rumored that they're going to change that which really sucks.

Fedora is something in between binary and source-based distro

it's a binary distro, but they have a strict policy of building stuff from source, including development dependencies

that's why Chromium has not found a place in Fedora yet, Chromium forks a lot of libraries out there and does weird stuff

still, for stuff like compilers you're stuck with relying on some binary blobs (you need the GCC blob at the very least)

with XDG-APPS fedora is moving more toward containerized apps, but that won't really help Chrome

I'm not going straight to BSD because I think it will be very HARDCORE me, hehe, I want a distro that is intuitive for me to learn to lower the level, to know things, how it works, learn more about linux, but also I can browse, study (do college information systems), and work, watch movies, listen to music, and a light, fast, fluid distro with a good performance both distro as graphic environment, and the fedora has left to be desired while therefore, both the question of learning how the issue of performance, have a dell inspiron i3 4gb of ram, 1tb hd, hd graphics 4400. understand?

FreeBSD is thoroughly documented, you won't feel lost in it as long as you follow the documentation

When it has drivers for your hardware, it's just like Linux

KDE, GNOME, Xfce, everything is available for it

If you don't want to build everything from source, you can use binary packages just like in Linux distros

Fedora is something in between binary and source-based distro

Exactly. With SRPMs you can build every package yourself, if you would desire that.

This is why projects such as CentOS are possible.

still, as a general purpose (non server distro) you may want to stick to linux

BSD has a great deal of packages and great build tools, but they tend to get old versions and you can't count on drivers to the same extent

linux + systemd + SELinux is a great combo not easily matched

then I recommend migrating to which distro? or continue on fedora so that with a lighter interface?

gentoo ? slackware? freebsd? openbsd? continue on fedora ?

gentoo ? slackware? freebsd? openbsd? continue on fedora ?

you can experiment with many things, I'd say gentoo has the most flexibility, while arch is a little more convenient

for production servers however: debian stable, centos

you can experiment with many things, I'd say gentoo has the most flexibility, while arch is a little more convenient

is that I have a certain fear of not cope, or be too much for me haha, I know you are compilers systems, but I really want to learn, and I have very good English, but it can be used for my purposes? college? to study ? work? recreation? which graphical interface you recommend? xfce?

i use google translater xD

I gave up on a favourite and switch between KDE, gnome and xfce every week or so

hmm..

it's a binary distro, but they have a strict policy of building stuff from source, including development dependencies

Because you cannot build from binaries, can you?