I'm 99% sure there is systemd.

systemd is a mallware 100% sure

systemd is a mallware 100% sure

NT core is malware, systemd is malware, MacOS is the malware!

NT core is malware, systemd is malware, MacOS is the malware!

"Fuck this desktop, should switch to Raspberri and FreeBSD."

NT core is malware, systemd is malware, MacOS is the malware!

I am not joking the people of arch is commenting on the IRC

I am not joking the people of arch is commenting on the IRC

I'm not joking, too :|

Well, not really malware.

But it forces your DNS as 8.8.8.8, for example.

But it forces your DNS as 8.8.8.8, for example.

Are you talking about the FallbackDNS that defaults to 8.8.8.8 unless you change it to another fallback DNS option?

https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/resolved.conf.html

Are you talking about the FallbackDNS that defaults to 8.8.8.8 unless you change it to another fallback DNS option?

Hmm :| Well, I don't know how it really works. I'm with systemd now and really happy how I can manage my services with systemctl. Also should try the nspawn feature. But systemd doesn't follow some Unix guidelines, which is bad in some meaning.

See this for a reasonable explaination debunking the headline "systemd sets your DNS to 8.8.8.8" https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6hzaxx/systemd_falls_back_to_google_nameservers_when_no/dj2fvl3/

See this for a reasonable explaination debunking the headline "systemd sets your DNS to 8.8.8.8" https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6hzaxx/systemd_falls_back_to_google_nameservers_when_no/dj2fvl3/

Ah thanks. Nothing to really worry about.

Exactly. :)

Fedora 26 release party @ Taipei Taiwan

These look so fun. I think we need to organize something around the place I live in

yeah around my place too

in my case, there's not many people using fedora around me

I think it's because general preference for kde

People tend to use distros traditionally associated to kde

Or ubuntu

Or debian

What?)

How connected using of distro to kde?

In the old times distros were more connected to specific desktops than today

And habits die hard

btw are u Yacy developer ?

Now thats an old comment... and no, i'm not, why?

Is there some virtual hdd led?

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/120/system-monitor/

Graphs HDD activity if you enable it in the settings

Anyone a "shiny" alternative to Gome software Center which holds a bit more packages? Or the place to go to add tons of them? Because as we all know Gnome Software center looks very empty but dnfdragora simply lists all dnf packages in a way, that can also get when I simply use the cli. .-. I search for something more enduser friendly

Anyone a "shiny" alternative to Gome software Center which holds a bit more packages? Or the place to go to add tons of them? Because as we all know Gnome Software center looks very empty but dnfdragora simply lists all dnf packages in a way, that can also get when I simply use the cli. .-. I search for something more enduser friendly

Add the elementary copr and get their AppCenter?

Will that work?

Anyone a "shiny" alternative to Gome software Center which holds a bit more packages? Or the place to go to add tons of them? Because as we all know Gnome Software center looks very empty but dnfdragora simply lists all dnf packages in a way, that can also get when I simply use the cli. .-. I search for something more enduser friendly

less shiny but way more useful: dnfdragora and yumex-dnf

Will that work?

It may fuck widely with the system.

less shiny but way more useful: dnfdragora and yumex-dnf

Well, what I have seen of dnfdragora I wouldn't call it more user-friendly than the cli ._.

Add the elementary copr and get their AppCenter?

I wouldn't trust it

It may fuck widely with the system.

No, the stable elementary copr is quite good.

I wouldn't trust it

Well, the software manager doesn't list a lot of stuff....

No, the stable elementary copr is quite good.

It still is adding another propable cuase of failure.

Well, what I have seen of dnfdragora I wouldn't call it more user-friendly than the cli ._.

Thats why i like yumex-dnf really. You can find any package, it shows all info neatly packed together and it is very fast.

If you want the dumb but shiny appstore use gnome software and if you want complete control use yumex-dnf or dnf cli.

"23-03-2017: yumex-dnf is no longer under active development" <— I should ride a dead horse?

Add the elementary copr and get their AppCenter?

Do you have a link to their copr .-. Would like to take a look

"23-03-2017: yumex-dnf is no longer under active development" <— I should ride a dead horse?

Until Fedora 27, when dnfdragora will become standard and i'll silently weep

I do wonder why you are against app center+dnf cli tough.

I do wonder why you are against app center+dnf cli tough.

I'm fine with that, but I wouldn't give this advice to a 90 years old lady

I'm fine with that, but I wouldn't give this advice to a 90 years old lady

For those Gnome Software has been made.

Exactly. But Gnome Software looks pretty empty

Do you have a link to their copr .-. Would like to take a look

No clue, search for elementary in the copr site ?

For those Gnome Software has been made.

Doesnt list a lot, even desktop environments...

No clue, search for elementary in the copr site ?

hehe I did and it didn't come up .-. That's why I was wondering :D

Doesnt list a lot, even desktop environments...

Thats kinda intentional tough. Someone that can't operate a terminal and dnf should not set to go into the prone-to-breakage task of switching what is powering their desktop.

hehe I did and it didn't come up .-. That's why I was wondering :D

Decathorpe/elementary

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/decathorpe/elementary-stable/

"23-03-2017: yumex-dnf is no longer under active development" <— I should ride a dead horse?

is it true?

is it true?

Yeah :(

whewww, that's bad -_-!

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/decathorpe/elementary-stable/

*embarrassed* thanks ? for some reason I didn't see it

tbh, i use fedora & fedora customize for daily use

*embarrassed* thanks ? for some reason I didn't see it

Happens to the best of us.

Guys, is the software boutique mate app available for Fedora? I've seen in on Ubuntu mate, and I'd like to know if it's available elsewhere...

ERROR: S client not available

Guys, is the software boutique mate app available for Fedora? I've seen in on Ubuntu mate, and I'd like to know if it's available elsewhere...

Same for the mate tweak application.

Guys, is the software boutique mate app available for Fedora? I've seen in on Ubuntu mate, and I'd like to know if it's available elsewhere...

No, boutique uses APT in their backend. I think you can use Fedy, but I don't recommend it.

No, boutique uses APT in their backend. I think you can use Fedy, but I don't recommend it.

Ok, what about mate tweaks?

No, boutique uses APT in their backend. I think you can use Fedy, but I don't recommend it.

Never install fedy if you can avoid it in any way at all

No, boutique uses APT in their backend. I think you can use Fedy, but I don't recommend it.

Wait, are you the alunux of the budgie copr?

Ok, what about mate tweaks?

Since when does Fedo ship with mate? Or is it available as spin?

Since when does Fedo ship with mate? Or is it available as spin?

Spin, right?

Oh right.

I still dont get why People would use Mate over Cinnamon

I still dont get why People would use Mate over Cinnamon

Nostalgia, works well, stable...

Nostalgia, works well, stable...

Only of those applies to my testing. XD

Ok, what about mate tweaks?

MATE Tweaks isn't upstream MATE Desktop projects, it's from Ubuntu Mate. Someone had opened an issue at github, but they didn't interest to make it upstream.

MATE Tweaks isn't upstream MATE Desktop projects, it's from Ubuntu Mate. Someone had opened an issue at github, but they didn't interest to make it upstream.

I'm searching the issue link ?

Only of those applies to my testing. XD

To each his own...

I'm searching the issue link ?

No probs. .

Wait, are you the alunux of the budgie copr?

Yup.

I still dont get why People would use Mate over Cinnamon

Because Cinnamon is really, really bad. Have you ever used it? I doubt you'd be the person to have liked it.

Yup.

Love your work; use budgie on Fedora everyday.... :)

Because Cinnamon is really, really bad. Have you ever used it? I doubt you'd be the person to have liked it.

I like it too.

I like it too.

I'm talking to Tobias

I like what mint's doing with it...

He likes professional stuff

Love your work; use budgie on Fedora everyday.... :)

Thank you ?

I'm talking to Tobias

And I'm talking to you. I like professional stuff too.

He'd immediately notice the thousand unprofessional things in Cinnamon that I notice

And I'm talking to you. I like professional stuff too.

You're just kinda a different person :) you can happily use a desktop and not notice all these little things

MATE Tweaks isn't upstream MATE Desktop projects, it's from Ubuntu Mate. Someone had opened an issue at github, but they didn't interest to make it upstream.

Yea, 2 points: it's available on mageia. And Ubuntu mate didn't want to upstream it?

He'd immediately notice the thousand unprofessional things in Cinnamon that I notice

I'm interested to know about this stuff. Kinda noob btw

You're just kinda a different person :) you can happily use a desktop and not notice all these little things

I'm not sure if that's an insult?

Yea, 2 points: it's available on mageia. And Ubuntu mate didn't want to upstream it?

Given that Ubuntu MATE is mostly just Martin Wimpress, they'd upstreamed it long ago if they wanted. I think it's that they don't want it.

Which is good because Mate Tweak is very unprofessional

It'd be sad to see it in upstream mate