@fedora

Страница 1017 из 2988
Michał
31.08.2017
10:04:17
hope there will be something like TreeStyleTab available... as I already lost hope for DownThemAll

Tanuj
31.08.2017
10:04:43
There is a flag to enable xul in ff57

Michał
31.08.2017
10:05:07
There is a flag to enable xul in ff57
good to know, but still it's a matter of time before it will be gone too

Tanuj
31.08.2017
10:05:39
Add-ons for Firefox https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vertical-tabs-reloaded/

Google
Michał
31.08.2017
10:06:25
Add-ons for Firefox https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vertical-tabs-reloaded/
vertical tabs are not exactly the same as tabs in a tree view, but still better than nothing ;)

Tanuj
31.08.2017
10:06:36
arc theme is broken in 56
Arc is old news anyway and new FF themes look v good

L
31.08.2017
10:07:18
Add-ons for Firefox https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vertical-tabs-reloaded/
it's cool that it's being rewritten for webextensions, but if it – like in chrome – opens a new window for the vertical tabs then it's a major step back

Tanuj
31.08.2017
10:07:20
vertical tabs are not exactly the same as tabs in a tree view, but still better than nothing ;)
Yeah, personally this is like 95% of what I want (tree is the 5%)

L
31.08.2017
10:07:34


Michał
31.08.2017
10:07:47
Tanuj
31.08.2017
10:07:56
Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:11:23
One of reason why I love palemoon so much. Yeah without e10s, but still good for me.
I hate it as developer, as infosec responsible person and personally.

Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:12:15
I think I will reevaluate vivaldi then
Why use closed source crap when you can get the original open sauce chromium with faster security fixes?

I hate it as developer, as infosec responsible person and personally.
Oh yeah of course installation of all meme browsers on all oses here (lunascape, palemoon, vivaldi, maxthon and and and) is blocked here. :3

Google
Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:14:39
As we simply dont provide then in ze company repo. Free choice between firefox, chrome, chromium and for testing if a client whines, ie.

Michał
31.08.2017
10:16:48
Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:17:16
https://vivaldi.com/source/
Thats not all of the source

You cant build vivaldi from that.

Hmm, what proof?
The palemoon developer doesnt have the time to backport security fixes that affect his product too sometimes for weeks after the code that has been changed to fix it has been made publicly available for one.

Thats not all of the source
I call any software that isnt up to the task of protecting users efficiently with clean code and quick updates and appropriate cve response a meme

And heck, palemoon still uses the old ff javascript engine that got a mahor rewrite not too many versions ago - so even testing palemoon and keeping it with web standards will become a close to impossible task for the small team palemoon has.

Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:20:49
Plus despite adnauseam being a security risk he blocked it (rightfully) but for the decision of it disrupting ad networks.

So he's on the wrong side of the battle imho.

Nevermind. I still trust them.
Sure, its not about trusting the palemoon dev to not do malicious things tough.

Michał
31.08.2017
10:22:43
Thats not all of the source
you're right. I'm using other closed source stuff anyways though, so well, I will consider it anyway

Tobias?
31.08.2017
10:22:44
Firefox now has rust code, servo, a new js engine, drops XUL for the much more secure webextensions finally (any xul addon can read all passwords stored in anx other xul addon for example, status: wontfix), has e10s and closed hundreds of cves.

Palemoon on the other hand lags behind not only years of advancement but also cannot include new fixes and speedups due to it being a completely different codebase now. I get that people liked the old style and dont want to move on, change is hard after all. But palemoon being used means you subject yourself to hundreds of vulnerabilities and a not only objectively worse browser in everything but "round tabs" - you also blip on webdev stats as 0,05% we have to atleast test for, giving us headaches on automation with a basically deprecated and dropped ff where no testing framework can grip into anymore.

Plus any site using browserupdate sees palemoon as terribly out of date and might block using it until you use a browser wih decent ecmascript 6 and html5 support.

*searches* actually holy shit palemoon doesnt even have promises support - rendering any angular website virtually useless until you install an addon that takes in them - a thing that should be highest priority and in the core (available: ff24, full support since: ff29, ecmascript 2015) And forget about polyfill, this is entirely new concepts stuff that can not be emulated in a meaningful way in old js code.

Isaac
31.08.2017
13:30:08
Horrible

Fadlun
31.08.2017
15:46:16
Google
Tobias?
31.08.2017
16:25:31
Niteen
31.08.2017
16:28:48
Hello.. How to play video using cli?

And which application should I use?

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
16:32:39
Tobias?
31.08.2017
17:29:47
Hello.. How to play video using cli?
mpv file or mpv youtubelink

after adding rpmfusion and installing mpv and youtube-dl

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
17:33:19
There should be more awesome software that doesn't require rpmfusion :/

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
17:34:15
sadly, yes

Gwindor
31.08.2017
17:34:35
Write more completely free software that is awesome. :D

So there would be more awesome software.

Niteen
31.08.2017
17:35:02
How to add rpm fusion

?

Simply download and install?

Tobias?
31.08.2017
17:37:18
And whats bad about rpmfusion? its kinda a default install tool now

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
17:37:33
Simply download and install?
here you go: https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration

And whats bad about rpmfusion? its kinda a default install tool now
The software in there is not completely free. Which is the main reason why software gets rejected by Fedora main repository. And it would be awesome to have more free software out there. Not just open source. :)

Google
Tobias?
31.08.2017
17:45:02
You have the choice.

Niteen
31.08.2017
17:53:18
Sheogorath
31.08.2017
17:54:47
You have the choice.
Sure, what I was about to say is: If there would be less non-free software that people want to use, simple because things are free, it would be awesome :D That's it.

Tobias?
31.08.2017
18:18:32
You mix up rpmfusion-free and rpmfusion-nonfree.

Rpmfusion-free should almost be installed by default - nonfree is the one you dont want in most cases.

Admin
ERROR: S client not available

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
18:28:52
Well, patent issues are still issues with people's freedom so I wouldn't call software, that causes that issues, free.

Tobias?
31.08.2017
19:19:20
Upon which they make it into the main repos

Akarshan
31.08.2017
19:39:18
How to enable vdpau on amdgpu? Vdpau is trying to load the libvdpau_nvidia driver but i have amd card.

Ahmed
31.08.2017
19:48:03
what is the best distro come with openbox ?

Tobias?
31.08.2017
19:48:40
Sheogorath
31.08.2017
19:49:38
virtualbox you mean?
http://openbox.org/wiki/Main_Page

Ahmed
31.08.2017
19:50:11
virtualbox you mean?
openbox is window managers

Tobias?
31.08.2017
19:50:11
openbox is window managers
Yea i hoped he didnt mean vbox XD

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
19:51:26
what is the best distro come with openbox ?
And here is your answer: http://openbox.org/wiki/Help:Distros_and_DEs_using_Openbox

Ahmed
31.08.2017
19:53:25


Google
Ahmed
31.08.2017
19:54:01
i tried BunsenLabs and found it's kernal is 3.16

Current 4.0 stable version was released on 10 April 2012. at staliz distro

Sheogorath
31.08.2017
19:58:11
@root_a I don't see your point .-.

Ahmed
31.08.2017
20:05:34
@root_a I don't see your point .-.
I did not understand you ?

Fernando
31.08.2017
20:51:38
what is the best distro come with openbox ?
The best distro is fedora. Openbox is in almost any distro.

Everes
31.08.2017
20:57:19
hello dears fellows friends

i love banana

norj
31.08.2017
22:20:00
creativity/10

Everes
31.08.2017
22:25:35
Ahmed
31.08.2017
22:26:39
good ? it 's gnome ?

Everes
31.08.2017
22:27:04
No. gnome is too heavy, im using KDE.

Kohane
31.08.2017
22:27:59
Everes
31.08.2017
22:28:00
Im using a core i5 I can feel that gnome is more heavy

Fernando
31.08.2017
22:47:05
Kde and gnome are similarly heavy

Everes
31.08.2017
23:16:29
Matteo
31.08.2017
23:40:43
For me, kde was heavier

Страница 1017 из 2988