it was wrong after i had used freebsd-update and before i compiled a kernel

There's something unusual but not wrong, did you see it?

versionaddendum in ssh_config has nothing to do with kernel's patch level bump and i don't think this discussion is going anywhere now so i am dropping out

versionaddendum in ssh_config has nothing to do with kernel's patch level bump and i don't think this discussion is going anywhere now so i am dropping out

Anyways, my point is that the source code and binaries are not exactly the same, which is stated in the security advisory.

can i use bhyve to host linux VM (let it be antix linux) and accessing R/W ntfs, luks2 and btrfs volumes through it?

can i use bhyve to host linux VM (let it be antix linux) and accessing R/W ntfs, luks2 and btrfs volumes through it?

freebsd has ntfs-3g package

can i use bhyve to host linux VM (let it be antix linux) and accessing R/W ntfs, luks2 and btrfs volumes through it?

also I would recommend exporting these filesystems as NFS, so you can easily use them on BSD host

freebsd has ntfs-3g package

it introduces damages to my system. last time .git was damaged and caused me to download the tree again. much inconvenience. yes i know to unmount this first, but due to graphics drivers my system hangs and i have nothing to do but hard reset

is nvidia-drm-kmod opensource?

citing https://www.freshports.org/graphics/drm-515-kmod/ (my current driver page), Please note that this package was built for FreeBSD 14.1. If this is not your current running version, please rebuild it from ports to prevent panics when loading the module. so rebuilding would help if I'm on 14.2-RELEASE? done, hoping there's no kernel panics after that..

so far no one kernel panic o_o nice

so far no one kernel panic o_o nice

because FreeBSD just works.

it used not to..

14.1 won't even accept keyboard input on my laptop

it used not to..

always has been

the delay for firefox to be added in pkg mirrors seems longer then usual this time

Well, if any of those fail…

Well, if any of those fail…

didn't failed when i compiled on my pc

local_unbound caches servfail response, anyone knows how this behavior can be tweaked?

On Reddit, a user exposes the FreeBSD system with a well-configured and customized desktop environment

On Reddit, a user exposes the FreeBSD system with a well-configured and customized desktop environment

Nice. KDE or Gnome?

Nice. KDE or Gnome?

No, it's a light environment, there's a lot of commentary

No, it's a light environment, there's a lot of commentary

Gib me link i am interested. 🤔🙄

No, it's a light environment, there's a lot of commentary

You can share the link here yep

You can share the link here yep

Yes, of course, after a moment that I arrive at the house, I share the link.

Yes, of course, after a moment that I arrive at the house, I share the link.

https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/1iv7cyv/how_would_you_rate_the_freebsd_system_for/

https://www.reddit.com/r/freebsd/comments/1iv7cyv/how_would_you_rate_the_freebsd_system_for/

the comment section....is interesting

but yeah the wifi problem is real

the comment section....is interesting

For me it is interesting everything, how the user exposes the system, the comments and others.

but yeah the wifi problem is real

And as the user exposes his WiFi...

You can share the link here yep

In the outlook it looks like we will soon have FreeBSD system with graphical desktop environment by default, that's what the survey says for laptops and desktop computer.

In the outlook it looks like we will soon have FreeBSD system with graphical desktop environment by default, that's what the survey says for laptops and desktop computer.

😐

😐

i don't think they will do that with every iso

but only specific iso build for desktop like gentoo does

gentoo has a livecd iso which comes with kde by default

I wonder why userland will be not updated after freebsd-update fetch install and then reboot. The output will be: #freebsd-version -kru 14.2-RELEASE-P1 14.2-RELEASE-P1 14.2-RELEASE-p2 🤔🙄 I mean will be updated but not will be applied after reboot...🙄😬

I wonder why userland will be not updated after freebsd-update fetch install and then reboot. The output will be: #freebsd-version -kru 14.2-RELEASE-P1 14.2-RELEASE-P1 14.2-RELEASE-p2 🤔🙄 I mean will be updated but not will be applied after reboot...🙄😬

Actually it's only userland updated.

Actually it's only userland updated.

Ahh, i see. So i should have wait with this update a little more? It was a bit early then? 🤔

Ahh, i see. So i should have wait with this update a little more? It was a bit early then? 🤔

No need, the update is completed already. Kernel is not affected.

btw after seeing the freebsd desktop user reddit post yesterday, i felt like posting how mine looks so here it goes

installed in may 2024, never needed to reinstall after that, the experience has been smooth sailing except some issues with specific ports :)

I like this oldschool setup much more then hyperland stuffs. 👍

I like this oldschool setup much more then hyperland stuffs. 👍

haha same

I was trying hyprland but honestly not my type. So went back classic xfce. Hopefully xfce will fully support wayland soon but it is not a big deal for me.

No need, the update is completed already. Kernel is not affected.

But is this normal? I would expect if a new patch coming out then should be affecting the kernel also...🙄

But is this normal? I would expect if a new patch coming out then should be affecting the kernel also...🙄

it was a patch for preincluded ssh

it was a patch for preincluded ssh

Nice. I did snapshot before update so i did rollback. I was thinking my update process broken...🙄

ChatGPT a bit funny 🤣 This is what gave me answer for my question. ME: According to this https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/poudriere-jail-base-system-is-14-2-release-p2-but-hosts-base-system-is-14-2-release-p1-after-updating.96946/ i dont think my upgrade process went wrong. I think FreeBSD did not issue yet patch 2 for kernel. Or? What do you think? ChatGPT: You're absolutely right! Based on that forum discussion, it seems that FreeBSD has released patch 2 (p2) only for the userland, not the kernel. That explains why freebsd-version -k (kernel) is still at P1, while freebsd-version -u (installed userland) is at P2. Why does this happen? FreeBSD applies patches separately to the kernel and userland. If a patch only affects userland components (e.g., libraries, utilities), the kernel remains unchanged. freebsd-version -kru reflects this distinction: -k (kernel) → Still at P1 -r (running userland) → Still at P1 (matches the running system) -u (installed userland) → Updated to P2 What Should You Do? Nothing is wrong with your system. It’s just that FreeBSD hasn't released a kernel patch P2 yet. You can double-check this by looking at FreeBSD's official security advisories or update logs: freebsd-update fetch If there's no kernel update available, you’re fully updated. Final Confirmation This is expected behavior, so no need to worry or force an update. If FreeBSD later issues a kernel patch (P2 or higher), freebsd-version -kru will reflect it after applying the update. 😁

https://www.bsdnow.tv/600

i have managed to run Kicad on OpenBSD via X forward from my FreeBSD box.

How is the lag?

https://www.freebsd.org/status/report-2024-10-2024-12 freebsd status report for anyone interested, the calls for 25 q1 status report has also begun so expect them soon as well

hmm, i have been hearing about pkgbase a lot, what's the issues with freebsd-update?

hmm, this might sound like a controversial opinion, but in my opinion the idea of adding hardware and wifi support using linux drivers and a compat layer is a bad one, hardware drivers should be native without translation as they are performance critical

today was the day freebsd kernel panic crashed for me

pretty rare compared to how many times it used to happen on linux for me

https://www.ghostbsd.org/news/GhostBSD_25.01-R14.2p1_Now_Available

anyone has cached package of vscode older than 1.97? this one has broken clipboard & i dont want to wait 2 days to build electron if so, DM please

anyone has cached package of vscode older than 1.97? this one has broken clipboard & i dont want to wait 2 days to build electron if so, DM please

Use Vim in the meantime ;) .

Use Vim in the meantime ;) .

i've got KATE

thx ;)

why laughin i use vim btw for notes in termux & for configuring VPS or some privileged configs

why laughin i use vim btw for notes in termux & for configuring VPS or some privileged configs

Vim is good but I really like helix.

Vim is good but I really like helix.

have you tried coding c# in it?

is it possible to mount erofs images in freebsd?

how do i get this deleted

there is another one it seems

nvm, mdconfig -d -u worked

did you first unmount /mnt? it should have told you something in the likes of "operation not permitted" if you did mdconfig -du before unmounting it

did you first unmount /mnt? it should have told you something in the likes of "operation not permitted" if you did mdconfig -du before unmounting it

yes i unmounted

yeah, good

is it possible to setup a specific version of llvm system wide to be used when building any port?

is it possible to setup a specific version of llvm system wide to be used when building any port?

https://man.freebsd.org/make.conf ?

https://man.freebsd.org/make.conf ?

sorry but do you mean the CFLAGS variable?

sorry but do you mean the CFLAGS variable?

CC .

have you tried coding c# in it?

I'm not much of a coder and mostly use the editor for markdown and such.

hmm, this might sound like a controversial opinion, but in my opinion the idea of adding hardware and wifi support using linux drivers and a compat layer is a bad one, hardware drivers should be native without translation as they are performance critical

In a perfect world yes, but with limited resources this needs to be done .

In a perfect world yes, but with limited resources this needs to be done .

wdym perfet world, even in normal world, the world we live in that's how things are done, that's how drivers are made normally, and since the foundation was pouring down so much money to hire expert devs, writing native drivers should be a possibility for them, have you ever heard if any other os doing anything like this? no, because this is wrong