give it some time, maybe it is just slow

Okk👍

You can also try to build programs via ports. Not recommended at all for big programs like web browsers but small utilities and such can be installed easily that way

Hi.... Update

Pkg always gets stuck here.. what to do?

I think the problem is not with pkg

Anything I need to do from internet from the terminal hangs... I was now installing lynx browser from ports.. but it also hung there

Here

Although ping pkg.freebsd.org(or any other address) works fine

What is your internet connection?

Although ping pkg.freebsd.org(or any other address) works fine

Wifi? Cable? Show ifconfig output

Also, show "printenv | grep -i http" output

Sorry.. i moved to debian😂

Wifi? Cable? Show ifconfig output

It was usb tethering though. My wifi card was not detected

Atheros QCA9377

Do have ethernet cable part? Try to switch to it.

Sorry.. i moved to debian😂

Oh, i see. Ok

Do have ethernet cable part? Try to switch to it.

Naah.. i don't have it.

Oh, i see. Ok

Yup

Naah.. i don't have it.

usb-tethering

usb-tethering

That I was already using.

It was usb tethering though. My wifi card was not detected

।

Hi, I have upgraded from 12.2 to 13.0. Using a Gnome desktop. Problem is, after shutting down, within a second or two, the system reboots. Any leads.

Hi, I have upgraded from 12.2 to 13.0. Using a Gnome desktop. Problem is, after shutting down, within a second or two, the system reboots. Any leads.

After shutting down, the system reboots? you mean it doesn't shutdown and instead reboots when told to shutdown?

After shutting down, the system reboots? you mean it doesn't shutdown and instead reboots when told to shutdown?

No. System shuts down and after a second, reboots.

No. System shuts down and after a second, reboots.

what command do you use for shutdown?

It is a Gnome 40 desktop. So, I use the shutdown button from the menu.

It is a Gnome 40 desktop. So, I use the shutdown button from the menu.

You probably should ask someone here or somewhere who uses gnome, I don't use gnome and shutdown from the command-line so I can't help you

I tried shutdown -p now (which probably is what Gnome shutdown also will do). But, it results in reboot just like it was before.

-h is a hard shutdown

I tried shutdown -p now (which probably is what Gnome shutdown also will do). But, it results in reboot just like it was before.

shutdown -h now

which version? I'm on 3.19 and I cannot reproduce that

Which pkg branch are you looking at? Also which Fbsd version?

Ports have 3.1.9 and you better be updated, as this is the minimum version that would work in a few weeks.

You can change your pkg branch to latest from quarterly and get the latest version

1. Copy /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf to /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf 2. Edit the copied file changing word quarterly on url param to latest: url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", 3. Run pkg update -f to update from the new repository metadata.

(: anytime

So freebsd, openbsd and netbsd Are different kernels but they bsd kernel forks that release 1995 right?

Being OpenBSD a fork from NetBSD

Being OpenBSD a fork from NetBSD

Funny to see Solaris on that graph I consider it Oracle'd to death...

it seems like being a nerd was more fun back then

But also more difficult as a programmer since some proprietary Unixes had a lot of quirks. GNU automake still checks for them if you run ./configure (as far as I know)

I've read that binaries on HP-UX failed and crashed often

and you couldn't just download stuff you needed. you actually had to order CDs

Being OpenBSD a fork from NetBSD

how come that linux inherited from GNU (which unix is that btw? :)) when it is not?

how come that linux inherited from GNU (which unix is that btw? :)) when it is not?

GNU's a recursive acronym, "GNU is not Unix" GNU was based on the same principles but its own code and didn't share any (at first?) with Unix

GNU's a recursive acronym, "GNU is not Unix" GNU was based on the same principles but its own code and didn't share any (at first?) with Unix

> at first to my knowledge it still doesn't contain code from any of the original and certified UNIXes

how come that linux inherited from GNU (which unix is that btw? :)) when it is not?

Linux didn't inherit anything from GNU, distributions used GNU as userland

how come that linux inherited from GNU (which unix is that btw? :)) when it is not?

also GNU was supposed to be a complete libre-software implementation of UNIX it reached its goal in userland, but stagnated on kernel-side with GNU hurd

also GNU was supposed to be a complete libre-software implementation of UNIX it reached its goal in userland, but stagnated on kernel-side with GNU hurd

so what that picture is about? Userlands? or kernels? if the latter, linux has nothing to do with either GNU as userland or even hurd

yes some was borrowed (APIs I think) from minix but that's all

so what that picture is about? Userlands? or kernels? if the latter, linux has nothing to do with either GNU as userland or even hurd

Operating systems in general (although Linux itself is just a kernel)

There are examples like kFreeBSD in debian or linux emualtors in BSDs that show a clear margin between userspace and kernel. So the question what is the operating system still persists :)

so what that picture is about? Userlands? or kernels? if the latter, linux has nothing to do with either GNU as userland or even hurd

The first block of gnu refers to the whole project, after Linux came it refers to the GNU OS which uses Hurd

yes some was borrowed (APIs I think) from minix but that's all

And MINIX probably borrowed them from research UNIX

I don't feel like borrowed API means any inheritance. Yet maybe I'm wrong.

anyone has build a router with freebsd? I have troubles with routing (amateur)

anyone has build a router with freebsd? I have troubles with routing (amateur)

??

as the handbook says, I have exactly the same scenario ISP ROUTER <=> freeBSD router <=> internal network

but... (I think is a route problem) cannot ping the ISP router from internal network

(and obiously, cannot acces to WAN)

the freeBSD router have wifi AP + eth with a bridge and dhcpd

but... (I think is a route problem) cannot ping the ISP router from internal network

Is packet forwarding enabled ?

the dhcp and wifi parts (seems) works fine, assigning the address, setting correct DNS and gateway....

And nat configured ?

y you mean gateway_enable="YES" on rc.conf, yes

And nat configured ?

this is one of my questions... is needed to do a nat ? (don't want by now map ports) only "share" internet

must be add a static route ?

Routes can be propagated via dhcp.

this is one of my questions... is needed to do a nat ? (don't want by now map ports) only "share" internet

How would your ISP router able to reply to your ping without a NAT in ipv4 ?

Routes can be propagated via dhcp.

yes, and seems be correct, pointing to <freeBSD router>

subnet 172.29.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option routers 172.29.1.1; }

How would your ISP router able to reply to your ping without a NAT in ipv4 ?

I don't know about that, this explains my presence here 😅

Or, in case of ipv6, you can just offload all that stuff to dhcpcd.

subnet 172.29.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option routers 172.29.1.1; }

thats ok :) I use: subnet 192.168.11.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 192.168.11.100 192.168.11.130; option routers 192.168.11.1; }

the dhcpd part seems work fine

is a some kind of routing mess

I don't know about that, this explains my presence here 😅

Well

For dhcpd there's no actual need for range, it tries to evade static IPs.

You need some firewall rules

You need some firewall rules

that is! you have all my atention :)

Oh yeah, that's where the fun starts.