Anonymous
I used to do it
Anonymous
For a new user, would it be best to use UFS to start?
Anonymous
For a new user, would it be best to use UFS to start?
Yes, because its less complicated than ZFS which is a volume manager plus a filesystem, UFS is fairly straightforward
Anonymous
Are there GUI tools for managing ZFS volumes?
I don't know, but my guess would be No since this is UNIX
Anonymous
I don't know, but my guess would be No since this is UNIX
Can I do full disk encryption within the installer for both ZFS and UFS?
Anonymous
Ok no problem, thanks for info
Anonymous
I used 3 programs most of the time: Tmux Vim Lynx Overall it was good
Anonymous
Well I used arch Linux, chromium with Xorg for that
Anonymous
I wasn't using freebsd on TTY 100% of the time
Anonymous
The standard display server for UNIX Basically all your GUI programs depend in it
Anonymous
Like the bloat, or being over saturated with color?
Anonymous
It gives you that hipster drug dose, I remember when I refused to use the file manager on Ubuntu and did everything from the terminal
Anonymous
Manually, so you can help freebsd devs?
Anonymous
Anonymous
No
Anonymous
So we have to force people to learn how to use the CLI?
Anonymous
What's the problem with that?
Anonymous
The GUI is your interface to the OS besides the CLI, they just have to get their job done, they don't need to learn CLI
Anonymous
Not everyone needs it at that level
Anonymous
remember when the nurds said ya had to use VI ? nano man
Albert
Hi, this is Albert from Barcelona, Spain. Glad to join and participate in this group.
Jaco
Hi everyone! 👋😊 I have searched the web into oblivion or maybe i suck at searching😜anybody care to point me in the right direction?
Krond
That's a system library, probably bash was left since previous FreeBSD version.
Anonymous
or a messed up link /usr/lib » /usr/local/lib
Krond
ldd -a `which bash`
Jaco
ldd -a `which bash`
When i run this command it returns with "no such file or directory"
Jaco
or a messed up link /usr/lib » /usr/local/lib
Thanks man I'm still fairly new to BSD world, is this a command i could use?
Anonymous
no its a location
Jaco
no its a location
I see now🤦😅bash is installed under /usr/local/bin/
Anonymous
have you done a pkg upgrade?
Jaco
have you done a pkg upgrade?
I have yes, i am on FreeBSD-current14
Anonymous
where do you find 14
Anonymous
do/did
Jaco
where do you find 14
Freebsd website
Jaco
I i try to switch to root in terminal i also get that message
Anonymous
In short: -CURRENT (currently 14.0) is the bleeding edge version of FreeBSD not meant to be installed by regular users. It's a development branch of FreeBSD where all the new stuff gets implemented. It's not stable by any means. May run ok, may not run ok, may format all your harddrives at once.
Anonymous
it's beta
Anonymous
I think about the same,
Jaco
I think about the same,
Ah man, it took me the whole day🙈😂and most my prepaid data bundles just to install freebsd stable now🤦🏻‍♂😅
Jaco
might be a problem with your ncurses version
Thank you! 😊The 2nd person to mention it. Better just do the fresh install then.
Anonymous
or you could wait for newer updates.... fix be comming
Badugar
Thank you! 😊The 2nd person to mention it. Better just do the fresh install then.
np man ldd and the which-package-does-this-file-belong-to feature of pkg can be useful
Jaco
or you could wait for newer updates.... fix be comming
I can't login to root which means i can update
Anonymous
your fooked
Jaco
your fooked
I could 5 minutes ago, best part is i didn't change anything 😂
Badugar
I can't login to root which means i can update
Then start a rescue system, mount your main system under /mnt and do passwd for root account That changes root's password
Jaco
Then start a rescue system, mount your main system under /mnt and do passwd for root account That changes root's password
Real heroes don't wear capes! 🙌Would you rather recommend i install freebsd-stable than freebsd-current? I understood current is like arch linux with more up to date packages, am i wrong?
Jaco
For the start -stable is better, I'd say
I'll try with stable if i can't manage with the live environment. Wouldn't it still give the "libtinfow.so.9 not found" error if i boot back up?
Jaco
That's what's blocking my root access, which i had 5 minutes ago
Anonymous
when ya boot single I forgot it ask for passwd ?
Anonymous
seems like it goes straight to the shell
Badugar
Try single boot, you can select that in Loader menu
Jaco
seems like it goes straight to the shell
This is what i got when switching to root
Anonymous
then mount -u / mount -a -t (filesystem. udf, zfs, whatever) to get r w
Anonymous
key statment from 14 ....... May run ok, may not run ok
Jaco
Thanks I'll try👍
Anonymous
I do not have that file
Jaco
Ah well, looks like reinstall is the only way, which i look forward too! 😅 Thanks @downhillflyer @Stromausf4ll for all your help😌
arfian
Where to if I want to find a manual and guidance for setting unbound? Thanks -Happy day
Hardcode
dns server daemon
arfian
dns server daemon
Yes That's what I mean
arfian
Gleb
Gleb
Note that this also affects X terminals, since they bell through the console ioctl().
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Isn't it changed to OFF by default in 13.0?
ɴꙩᴍᴀᴅ
Mine at least was OFF
Gleb
No, it just has been changed to OFF in the main branch and there is a heated discussion about this change.
Krond
What are the pros? "Midnight department 3am" colos and desktops?
Anonymous
instead of bitching about the bell in the console how about fixing X to auto-config like w/ ghostbsd.
Anonymous
instead of bitching about the bell in the console how about fixing X to auto-config like w/ ghostbsd.
Yeah, sounds like giving importance to really small issues Its basically the bike-shedding principle