https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0249/

thats another one but you can find more

still interesting

Which framework would you reccomend me for networking?

https://github.com/cpptogether/wire

Simple and small

Not like boost asio and so

Is it for c too?

Nah

What do you want to use exactly?

Make rest requests?

I'm new in networking, i dont know

I'm learning c

In C++ foo() function foo with no parameters foo(void) function foo with no parameters In C foo() function foo with an unspecified numbers of parameters foo(void) function foo with no paramters

thankI

noted

You will have to tell that to Facebook and Google engineers

Until u try D. https://dlang.org U should also try some functional languages even tho u might not be required to use it many job specifications

Are you trying to start a war?

C... C++ is extension of C with complex OOP code added.

U need to learn C++ once more if you think this is C++.

So to know C++ you have to know C anyways.

Wrong

U need to learn C++ once more if you think this is C++.

Putting it simply...

Wrong

That I do not agree with you, YES... C++ is based on C... so YES.

That I do not agree with you, YES... C++ is based on C... so YES.

C++ is NOT based on C

C++ is NOT based on C

Yeah you're right it's based on Pascal... sorry.

Cpp is only compatible with some subset of C. And if you're crude enough, your C++ can look like C

Yeah you're right it's based on Pascal... sorry.

C++ has it's own philosophies

Which is a far cry from what C stands for

Yeah you're right it's based on Pascal... sorry.

And how will you prove this?

So?

Which is a far cry from what C stands for

Do you understand the meaning of "Based on C"? The rules it follows are C rules... other than it's Object Oriented... this is something C++ Supports but C doesn't...

int a = 10; in C or C++ are same...

a++; in C and C++ are same...

But when it comes to classes and ojects things change.

C++ is NOT based on C

" [Stroustrup] began work on "C with Classes", which as the name implies was meant to be a superset of the C language. His goal was to add object-oriented programming into the C language" http://www.cplusplus.com/info/history/

int a = 10; in C or C++ are same...

Yeah, same in Java. Java is C based now huh?

Yeah, same in Java. Java is C based now huh?

Yes Java is based on C

a++; in C and C++ are same...

Same goes for Java

Yes Java is based on C

Wew!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C-family_programming_languages

In 2018, it's no longer safe to utter such statement.

Plus C++ has it's root with simula also

Plus C++ has it's root with simula also

So?

So?

It's based on Simula

It's based on Simula

Which is another shortsighted thing to say

I don't like the word "based", it's confusingly wrong

Plus C++ has it's root with simula also

You can use C++ compiler to compile most of C code, you can't compile C with Java compiler and can't compile Simula with C++ compiler

You can use C++ compiler to compile most of C code, you can't compile C with Java compiler and can't compile Simula with C++ compiler

+1

You can use C++ compiler to compile most of C code, you can't compile C with Java compiler and can't compile Simula with C++ compiler

can't compile Simula with C++ compiler. I didn't say you could, did I?

+1

U might want to answer the Java part before dishing out pluses

can't compile Simula with C++ compiler. I didn't say you could, did I?

But as Igor stated a very important point, you can compile C program in C++ compiler...

U might want to answer the Java part before dishing out pluses

Dear I sent you a link, it says Java is based on C...

But as Igor stated a very important point, you can compile C program in C++ compiler...

How many have you tried?

Inspired by Objective-C

Dear I sent you a link, it says Java is based on C...

Nope based on the analogy above, can u can compile C with Java compiler?

Nope based on the analogy above, can u can compile C with Java compiler?

Based does not mean you can always compile a program written for other language in that compiler... Visual Basic is based on BASIC but you can't write line numbers it'll not compile...

Inspired by Objective-C

Now u're talking. Inspired by Influenced by Influenced These are the words.

Objective-C is based on C...

Read the link I sent please...

Based does not mean you can always compile a program written for other language in that compiler... Visual Basic is based on BASIC but you can't write line numbers it'll not compile...

So, why were u giving plus 1 when sm1 wrote something on the contrary?

Read the link I sent please...

I care less

Most people don't know what they're writing anyway

I'm sorry I don't wanna get into a pointless argument... I rest my case... you won.

I'm sorry I don't wanna get into a pointless argument... I rest my case... you won.

Cheap

Let's take systemd or OpenSSL and compile then with g++ and let's see what happens

"The C++ programming language was based on the C programming language as it existed shortly after the ANSI C standardization effort had begun. Around 1995 an ISO committee was formed to standardize C++, and the new standard was ratified in 1998, which is officially known as ISO/IEC 14882-1998, Programming Languages - C++. It is referred to in this document as "C++98" or simply as "C++"."

"BASED"

http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm

"BASED"

Influenced by

http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm

Ah this text

The maindifference might be C++ being more strict about types during compile time. In C one can char* a = malloc(1); whereas in C++ you should cast the malloc

http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm

Only if u guys did read this completely

No it was based on, why are you being delusional again, are you the same guy who told that C should go to trash and C++ is the future&present?

The maindifference might be C++ being more strict about types during compile time. In C one can char* a = malloc(1); whereas in C++ you should cast the malloc

Oh no... it should just work without casting

No it was based on, why are you being delusional again, are you the same guy who told that C should go to trash and C++ is the future&present?

C is crap

C is for cesspit

In 2018, compilers can do better

Oh then I won't even argue with you this time, have a nice day

Than let programmers die in pains