or even explain any highly unlikely non nefarious rationale for such things

If I'm a newbie, I would pick fedy rather than rpmfusion I think. Their website's ux sucks. I mean look at it. https://www.folkswithhats.org/ https://rpmfusion.org/

Fedy is newbie friendly. Has gui tools. One click install. Who wouldn't choose this?

In security standpoint, rpmfusion is way better.

the fact I can't see the script natively on the page is a big red flag

the fact I can't see the script natively on the page is a big red flag

Yes. Because you're a linux modder lul :P

look at this https://github.com/folkswithhats/fedy

@mi_tsuki no because I'm educated to the risks of random scripts and read them FIRST

lol I see what you did there

i can save the page as html and send it to , you just have to bookmark it or upload it to server online,etc.. in the end you will have nice site ux for rpmfusion :3

functional and maintainable is the priority for that small project

lol , my hand press enter before i complete my words ._.

Well at least rpmfusion doesn't hide under the abstraction of script file. And no piping curl-bash too on sudo elevation.

dnf uses curl as backend to fetch files right?

right ?

but not with a pipe elevation

you need to explictly use sudo dnf install/update foo

hmm, just installed tor , then added localhost in proxy settings in firefox , and port 9050 , then started tor.service by : systemctl start tor.service. opened firefox , try to open any site , take forever untill tell me connection timed out ?

(sudo systemctl status tor && sudo firewall-cmd —list-all ) | fpaste

likely blocked at the f/w

tor or the torbrowser-launcher or both

tor only

also should be using privoxy too if you are using it for anything beyond basic content filters on a campus or parental controls

fpaste link pls

ok

https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/tLCE4i3kZ11RLmYDg7yF2Q

the service was not running , here is running : https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/k2o9Kv5X4dPCe46RVRi1vA

now retry

the firewall-cmd part of command was have mistake in '--'list-all , this why there's no firewall-cmd output in fpaste url . —- tried to connect now and same problem , https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/RoRRf-PR3buPLVrcQ36~PA

https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/-EAKJvzSe43HmKLvkAkEtg

for comparison

and I'm not fully locked down yet

I’m can agree to not use fedy again, but won’t wipe till 27 comes out

not sure I can agree on the delay but your box not mine

personally i reinstall linux like two or three times in one month lel :V

I've done custom reinstalls 6 times in Sept already

Lol...I’ve done it about a dozen times this week...but happy with things at the moment.

this connection is making me very leary now all the suddent

Lol...I’ve done it about a dozen times this week...but happy with things at the moment.

l000l , it's not only me in this world so ?

https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/Xbeu-JqPUlagZhFdZLAqeA « present dual boot

@sc0rpio492 I’m a chronic hopper

Does this theme hides the top bar from GNOME? ?

steam is available in both copr and rpmfusion both are supported repos

I never used copr. I think i can't install both, right?

I never used copr. I think i can't install both, right?

all copr repos are added separately

so for example you can install arduino repo which will give you arduino ide only

rpmfusion gives you access to all packages from the repo

rpmfusion gives you access to all packages from the repo

Got it. Thank you

first nsf errror, then on provisoing got ssh keys permission error.

first nsf errror, then on provisoing got ssh keys permission error.

If it cant use nfs to provision the thing how would it login to it?

that is working, now i get this error, TASK [Gathering Facts] ********************************************************* fatal: [attendance-service]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Failed to connect to the host via ssh: Warning: Permanently added '192.168.33.125' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.\r\nPermission denied (publickey,password).\r\n", "unreachable": true} to retry, use: --limit @/var/www/html/attendance-service/etc/ansible/site.retry

@Wolfshappen

that is working, now i get this error, TASK [Gathering Facts] ********************************************************* fatal: [attendance-service]: UNREACHABLE! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Failed to connect to the host via ssh: Warning: Permanently added '192.168.33.125' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.\r\nPermission denied (publickey,password).\r\n", "unreachable": true} to retry, use: --limit @/var/www/html/attendance-service/etc/ansible/site.retry

your key or password is not registered with the created vn.

I have added this in vagrant file # copy SSH keys to vagrant config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/home/vagrant/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"] config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/root/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"]

I have added this in vagrant file # copy SSH keys to vagrant config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/home/vagrant/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"] config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/root/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"]

... you have excluded the wrong file.

that excluded file is THE ONE you NEED

.authorized_keys contains the allowed keys, the other files should never be there because they are your private (and public) keys.

unless you are sshc opy-id'ing keys manually

Make sure .authorized_keys actually contains the pubkey you want and ideally make that in another folder.

you need ~/.ssh/*key.pub and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys{2}

~/.ssh/authorized_keys ~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 former is host generated and the latter is all program/project keys

you need ~/.ssh/*key.pub and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys{2}

He doesnt need the pubkeys. He just needs a file where all his wanted pubkeys are in and name it authorized_keys

I have added this in vagrant file # copy SSH keys to vagrant config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/home/vagrant/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"] config.vm.synced_folder "~/.ssh", "/root/.ssh", type: "rsync", rsync__exclude: ["authorized_keys"]

u need chmod 600 .ssh/authorized_keys

u need chmod 600 .ssh/authorized_keys

He excluded that very file. Any permission change will be useless if he doesnt copy it.

700 ~/.ssh -R 600 ~/.ssh

? still doesn't get solved yet

it amazes me that gnome online accounts does not have caldav/carddav. Luckily there is california for calendar. Might as well uninstall gnome contacts.

it's what gnome devs want to push silly not what makes sense 100% of time

I just read an article, it's all there, just not exposed. I will have to set it all up under evolution then remove evolution...lol

again it's what they want to push

which includes evolution

Chrome is another one :D it works nice with enough RAM or Swap but is able to kill your DE if you run out of Memory

Interesting. I find it lighter than Firefox.

Interesting. I find it lighter than Firefox.

Depends on the number of Tabs you have open. ;) When you use less than 10 tabs at the time, yes, it's lighter, but when it comes to a few hundred tabs Chrome simply kills your machine. And even worse, there doesn't happen any OOP because chrome uses way less memory than your usual programms, since every TLD splits into an own process

Depends on the number of Tabs you have open. ;) When you use less than 10 tabs at the time, yes, it's lighter, but when it comes to a few hundred tabs Chrome simply kills your machine. And even worse, there doesn't happen any OOP because chrome uses way less memory than your usual programms, since every TLD splits into an own process

There's an extension to stop tabs from accessing chrome's memory right? That way even if you have a lot of tabs open it wouldn't slow down, nor use a lot of resources.

It's there for firefox also, but idk the name for it

There's an extension to stop tabs from accessing chrome's memory right? That way even if you have a lot of tabs open it wouldn't slow down, nor use a lot of resources.

The chrome extension either did this or it kills the tab itself and loads it when the user requires it to do so.

Don't really know the extension name because it's been quite a while since I used chrome lol

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/onetab/chphlpgkkbolifaimnlloiipkdnihall?utm_campaign=en&utm_source=en-et-na-us-oc-webstrhm&utm_medium=et

The chrome extension either did this or it kills the tab itself and loads it when the user requires it to do so.

try this extension

Depends on the number of Tabs you have open. ;) When you use less than 10 tabs at the time, yes, it's lighter, but when it comes to a few hundred tabs Chrome simply kills your machine. And even worse, there doesn't happen any OOP because chrome uses way less memory than your usual programms, since every TLD splits into an own process

Few hundreds? Then it’s your fault, not browser’s

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/onetab/chphlpgkkbolifaimnlloiipkdnihall?utm_campaign=en&utm_source=en-et-na-us-oc-webstrhm&utm_medium=et

That is a horrible idea unless your pc is from pre-2010.

There's an extension to stop tabs from accessing chrome's memory right? That way even if you have a lot of tabs open it wouldn't slow down, nor use a lot of resources.

The great Suspender

Depends on the number of Tabs you have open. ;) When you use less than 10 tabs at the time, yes, it's lighter, but when it comes to a few hundred tabs Chrome simply kills your machine. And even worse, there doesn't happen any OOP because chrome uses way less memory than your usual programms, since every TLD splits into an own process

Firefox now splits too because its simply the smarter thing for security. firefox as of yet limits to 4 processes but i'd expect it to use 1 process per tab soon enough. And Chromium doesnt kill your machine - if you need the ram it simply swaps it out. It just uses the amount of ram you have in a smart way.

Firefox now splits too because its simply the smarter thing for security. firefox as of yet limits to 4 processes but i'd expect it to use 1 process per tab soon enough. And Chromium doesnt kill your machine - if you need the ram it simply swaps it out. It just uses the amount of ram you have in a smart way.

Up to seven I believe

Firefox now splits too because its simply the smarter thing for security. firefox as of yet limits to 4 processes but i'd expect it to use 1 process per tab soon enough. And Chromium doesnt kill your machine - if you need the ram it simply swaps it out. It just uses the amount of ram you have in a smart way.

until you run out of swap… As I said before, as long as you have enough swap it's totally fine :D

until you run out of swap… As I said before, as long as you have enough swap it's totally fine :D

I have swap, but it's only used for hibernation

until you run out of swap… As I said before, as long as you have enough swap it's totally fine :D

It swaps to its own temporary files.

It swaps to its own temporary files.

Didn't know, thanks

It swaps to its own temporary files.

I can tell you, if it does, not enough. I almost once a week have to switch to a tty and run pkill chromium to go back to a usable system. simply because chromium uses so much RAM and SWAP that kswapd drives the system crazy